http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/922000?baseline=1061742
Core M vs A8X
Couldn't believe that the iPad Air 2 actually has a higher Geekbench score than the upcoming retina MacBook!
Senator, I've driven a Mustang GT. I know Mustangs. The Mustangs I looked at inside the dealership last weekend are phenomenal automobiles. Senator, this MacBook is no Mustang.It's outrageous that to haul a bunch of stuff around in your brand new Mustang GT you would have to get a trailer hitch and trailer. It won't even haul big loads! It's absurd that Ford has no regard for the customer when you can't put 7 people in it, it won't get 60mpg, and won't even fit in tiny parking spots!
My point is that if the new Macbook doesn't meet your needs, then don't buy it! They have other models that might better fit those needs. If your needs are to haul around a bunch of people along with a Bobcat, a Mustang might be a bad choice. Although if you want a fun car that will go really fast and you only ever take one passenger, that Mustang might be looking like a good choice.
Why can't Apple just leave things alone? Everyone just wanted a Macbook Air with a retina screen. They give you the retina screen but take away all the connectivity. Everyone wanted an updated Mini, they gave us a speed and spec bump but took away the upgradeability.
The problem is that Ive has way too much power internally at Apple and no one left to tell him when his **** stinks. He is surrounded by "yes" men. Having absolutely no connectivity so Ive can make the laptop a few millimetres thinner is insanity and evidence of his form-over-function design philosophy taken to the absolute extreme.
Erm.. I clearly have no intent to buy this Macbook because of how bad it is.
Also, apparently it starts at $1.5K in Canada.
It's ridiculous how I have to buy an adapter just to use the computer. That's why it's horrible. I don't understand why people like you seem to take personal offense.
I'm saying: This is a horrible product. You can have your opinion. But my opinion is that it's bad, very, very bad. Why? Because it's a downgrade of experience, but upgrade in price. Less battery, Less ports, Less CPU, Less Heat tolerance. Has a retina display going for it at least... Too bad I can't use my computer how I want to when I'm charging it. Forget about games.
I was expressing my outrage at how horrible this is, related to the news. This was my reaction. I wasn't pissing and whining about it as you so kindly say. Are you saying that the only reaction that is acceptable is for me to be like "Hey, this is wonderful. Good work Apple!"
You have your opinion, I have mine. So leave me alone.
No ports, more money. Not sold on this. I am hoping the other apple laptops will remain.
Agree 100% just another sneaky way for them to sell adapters, and I was thinking of getting the 8/512 but for $1600 Really I do not need to spend more money on silly adapters, so not worth that, I will just order a new MBA 13 8/512 for similar amount of $
My laptop is my only computer. Under normal circumstances, it is connected to a monitor, speakers, and a USB 3 hub for a couple of hard drives. That amount of connections is not possible for the new MacBook. I do occasionally disconnect but not often, at the time the 15 MacBook pro made more sense than an iMac. This laptop is not meant for people like me. I can't understand why someone wouldn't buy a MacBook air which is still thin and light with a better processor and more ports.
i was curious why extra ports are a deal breaker for people?
ive had my macbook air for 5 years and use it for work as well as i am a software developer.
i have never used any of the ports except for headphone jack.
Thus as this is a 'portable' machine, the removal of ports makes sense to me.
If it only the screen would have been bigger!
The Air has:
- longer battery life
- usb ports
- thunderbolt
- sd card
- magsafe! ( I cannot believe they expect people to go back to cord tripping
)
- cheaper
- larger screen
You're missing the new keyboard and trackpad as positives.
I don't understand what you guys are using all ports for?! Please enlighten me.
Desktop macs do not need batteries.
I currently run a 240GB SSD as boot drive, apps and some files, I use an external drive for all other data including iTunes, also on My MBP I use the display port for an HDMI cable I connect to a TV in my RV so that I can watch all the movies on my external drive. So having one port and the need for Power, HDMI, USB 3.0 kind of dampens me getting a new MB
Senator, I've driven a Mustang GT. I know Mustangs. The Mustangs I looked at inside the dealership last weekend are phenomenal automobiles. Senator, this MacBook is no Mustang.
I'm pretty sure design dictates engineering at Apple.
I don't buy this for one second and i'm pretty sure you have nothing to back this claim up. Ports will be one of those things users never really appreciated until they were taken away from them.
Off the top of my head, the following extremely common tasks will not be possible without an adapter (assuming Macbook is plugged in):
1. Use of an external display.
2. Use of external hard drive or USB flash drive for data or time machine backups.
3. No wired printer or scanner connectivity
4. No wired keyboard or mouse connectivity
5. Cannot charge iPhone, iPad or other USB device.
6. Cannot import photos from camera using SD card.
7. Cannot get wired networking.
I cannot understand how people still think you need 8Gb of ram minimum on a Mac.
Because people do not have even a basic understanding of how caching, buffers and RAM management work in a modern Unix/Linux operating system. If the RAM is there the system will use it.
Chromebooks have way more connectivity
And I don't think the adapter is the answer because:
1. They are easy to lose or break
2. They are easy to forget
3. Having an adapter hanging off the side ruins the sleekness of the device
4. In Australia, the adapter which only gives 1 x USB, 1 x HDMI (or VGA) costs 8 percent of the total cost of the laptop.
5. It does not provide ethernet (do we need to daisy chain adapters now or something)?
At that point in time, both Steve Jobs and Scott Forstall were there to counter-balance Ive and call him out when wrong.
So looking at this new MacBook:
- The Core M 5Y71 in the faster model might be weedy for a modern CPU but it's still probably going to be about twice as fast as the Core 2 Duo L9600 in my current machine, which is a 2010 Air.
- Lack of MagSafe is annoying, but on the other hand I already need a mini-DisplayPort to HDMI dongle for my Cintiq, and I have never used my SD card slot.
- It's £20 cheaper than the refreshed 13" Macbook Air with the same RAM (8Gb) and flash (512Gb).
- It has a Retina screen and it weighs 2lbs!
My 2010 Air is anaemic compared to modern computers, but it's still going strong with no lag or noticeable lack of horsepower. In fact it's still so good I'm not sure I can justify an upgrade. But this new MacBook is so very tempting - I thought I would hate the machine after seeing the leaks, but actually I can't wait to try it out in a store.
As laptops like this one become more popular, developers will need to stop targeting the bleeding edge of processor/GPU power and make sure their apps scale down to more modest machines. iOS developers manage to write apps for low-power CPUs without lag. I know it won't happen, and games will continue to have 'minimum' specs asking for a GTX 980 but it is stupid how much faster processors get and how much slower the same software ends up running on them.
This is Apple's cheapest Retina macbook by far
The problem with Apple has always been that there's no real choise. There's some outdated and overpriced model that lacks the most needed feature of the new thing. To get the new feature, you loose 3 old.You're right, it is form-over-function. So let's hope Apple customers are smart enough to leave this on the shelf. If no one at Apple is willing to curb this endless obsession with thinness, the market will have to decide. So it's up to us, the consumers, to say yes or no. I'll be saying no, just like I did when the they added a mirror-like sheet of untreated glass in front of every iMac's screen back in 2007.
I currently run a 240GB SSD as boot drive, apps and some files, I use an external drive for all other data including iTunes, also on My MBP I use the display port for an HDMI cable I connect to a TV in my RV so that I can watch all the movies on my external drive. So having one port and the need for Power, HDMI, USB 3.0 kind of dampens me getting a new MB
Why are the macbook air and pro prices higher in europe now? Much higher![]()
I don't understand what you guys are using all ports for?! Please enlighten me.
i have another argument.
Imagine that your son was kidnapped. The kidnappers say: "you'll only have you son back if you can plug in your computer one usb and one charger at same time".
Well, now you can't. And you lost your son. Forever.
i was curious why extra ports are a deal breaker for people?
ive had my macbook air for 5 years and use it for work as well as i am a software developer.
i have never used any of the ports except for headphone jack.
Thus as this is a 'portable' machine, the removal of ports makes sense to me.
I don't understand what you guys are using all ports for?! Please enlighten me.
I don't understand what you mean by this?
stuff,in your signature
will NEVER be irrelevant to you or me!