I wouldn't get too haughty there. Just because you poked a hole in his argument doesn't mean it's devoid of validity. Try a more measured response.
Well, it is dvoid of validity. His conclusion might have merits, but not the argument in itself.
Bang & Olufsun...if I said they were obscure, you'd jump all over me,
No, not really. I tend to agree. But my point was to show that you cannot make such an argument based on country of origin of the company.
so let's just say they're less...notorious than Apple and Sony. So while such a parallel works to your advantage, it still employs a degree of hyperbole to make your point. Really, the comparisons end once you get past "foreign company."
Haha, indeed. But that "foreign company" was his whole argument. He stated that since Apple is an american company, it should be discussed in US$. That was his whole argument, and that argument is indeed invalid.
What began this discussion was some bloke getting annoyed about someone saying there wasn't enough price diff between the iPhone and the Touch, quoting two prices, both in british pounds, iirc. Those prices should be compared to each other, and doesn't necessitate writing it in US$ too. It can be looked up quite easily, but aren't really necessary in that situtation. It could have been made in the imaginary currency "kloggers", and it would still be obvious: "The iPhone costs 23.000 kloggers, while the iTouch cost 21.800 kloggers. - way to little price difference between the two"
However, I agree that if we talk about prices in general, it's always good form to use US-dollars as well on a foremost american forum. Just like it's a good idea for americans to learn (and include them) metric measurements when they're on an international forum *especially since they're the ones sticking out as the odd one in that context.