Their stock has dropped $14 since this morning.
With Jobs dead, all attention to the slightest detail is weaning.![]()
I disagree consumers are reading more reviews and understanding simple technology better. If the 5C & 5s looked the same maybe, but that home button and housing stands out right off the bat with the side by side.
When the customer ask what's the difference between the 5C & 5S and the salesman tells them, 5S has a new faster processor, the finger reader and explains what can be done with it, reworked home button, better cameras, more elegant housing & the 5C is basically last years phone it's not going to be hard to decide on the 5S and then throw in the salesman will say if you every want a color case you can just buy a slip here, flea market or ebay.
It's not about entitlement--it's about choices. I really wanted to buy my first iphone. But when they price them at triple the cost of an android competitor, it's really hard to consider them as a viable option. I would pay a premium of $50, or $100, or possibly even $150 over say a Nexus 4 which will perform similarly, because I think iOS is superior to Android. But The 5C is priced $350 more than the Nexus 4, which is just insane. So many people will choose the cheaper option.
I don't own a smartphone, but I do own Apple and iOS devices. I would like a smartphone, but Apple refuses to make one at what I (and now the majority of phone buyers) consider a reasonable price. They are losing market share, and I think this will continue or even increase with the 5C's absurd pricing. Apple penetrated the mp3 player market with a variety of products -- ipod, ipod touch, ipod nano, ipod mini, but they still really only have one phone (the price difference between 5C and 5S is negligible). People would love an affordable iphone.
If nothing else, take the ipod touch ($230 retail) and add on the cellular radio that is in the ipad/mini ($130 retail) and you have a $360 phone. Still way cheaper than the 5C and they don't even have to design anything and they keep existing profit margins. But no, we get this. Our reaction is not entitlement, it's disappointment that we won't be part of the superior Apple ecosystem at these insane prices.
BUT if one of those customers has a scrap of common sense (rare in this world I know) they'll realise that they don't necessarily need those additional things.
It's swings and roundabouts really. At first I was a bit miffed by the 5C price but the more I've thought about it in relation to the plan I use it is an ok deal.
Still a bit confused as to why they dropped the 5 all together though.
The prices of high end flagship smart phones are not dropping in general, actually, are they? Outliers aside I mean. What does an S4 cost off contract? Note 2? HTC One? S3 even?
The issue seems to be more of an expectation that this was going to be a somehow significantly lower cost phone - an expectation created by the media based on trying to tie together different rumours - and since lots of people wanted to believe it, now they are upset it hasn't come to pass.
The sense of entitlement I am describing comes not from the reaction to the price, but more from the disappointment of Apple not delivering on this misguided expectation that has been built up, and the subsequent ultimatum and threatening that each individual poster has done saying they will leave the platform unless Apple corrects or changes or fixes things to fulfil that expectation.
First off, no salesperson will ever list all those features of the 5S. 99% of customers will not even care about most of those features. The only 2 features they really added that customers will care about is the fingerprint reader and a better camera. But if a person already has an iPhone they are probably already satisfied with their camera. It will be a tough sale for sure. Obviously, current iPhone users will choose the 5S. But it remains to be seen if the new features are important enough to new customers to buy the 5S over the 5C. Especially when contract prices are going to be so low to walk out of the door with the 5C.
Trends say otherwise. We've seen a general moving away from tech specs as product features that are marketed for quite some time, the average consumer never knew what they were asking for or what the spec actually meant anyway (or why they should prefer it over the same item with 1 less in the name, e.g. 386 vs. 486). They aren't marketing the 5c as the "slower iPhone", apps won't run differently on it, people understand "the sales pitch" and I think they are wise enough to understand that if there will be no apps that won't run on the 5c, and to be honest it's the same as the iPhone 5 which has never been considered a "slow phone", why not just save the $100 and spend it on something else.
The average user won't realise in every day, common, average use any difference between the two phones (we're talking average and common users here), save the money in these days of austerity, average consumers aren't interested in keeping up with chip details, they want to know if it'll take pictures, if it'll connect to Facebook, if it'll make calls and run *all* the apps on the AppStore, and except for a small portion of the population, they don't need anything more than the 5c offers.
You are right. Prices of flagship phones are not dropping. The 5C is most certainly not flagship though. Galaxy S3 off contract goes for about $400 unlocked according to Amazon. Seems like a pretty good comparison for the 5C to me and about the price point people would like to see.
As for your second point, again you said people should take their money elsewhere if they don't like it, and when they say that is what they are going to do, you say they are "threatening" to leave the platform and are "entitled", but isn't that exactly what you originally suggested people do? I don't get it.
By the way, AAPL is down $11.53 as I type this (or 2.28%), so it seems like the market is not too impressed either.
That is fair enough, but these insane prices are actually unchanged price structures from since the original iPhone was released.
You sound like a perfect candidate for a second hand iPhone 5 or 4S. What is stopping you?
Trends say otherwise. We've seen a general moving away from tech specs as product features that are marketed for quite some time, the average consumer never knew what they were asking for or what the spec actually meant anyway (or why they should prefer it over the same item with 1 less in the name, e.g. 386 vs. 486). They aren't marketing the 5c as the "slower iPhone", apps won't run differently on it, people understand "the sales pitch" and I think they are wise enough to understand that if there will be no apps that won't run on the 5c, and to be honest it's the same as the iPhone 5 which has never been considered a "slow phone", why not just save the $100 and spend it on something else.
The average user won't realise in every day, common, average use any difference between the two phones (we're talking average and common users here), save the money in these days of austerity, average consumers aren't interested in keeping up with chip details, they want to know if it'll take pictures, if it'll connect to Facebook, if it'll make calls and run *all* the apps on the AppStore, and except for a small portion of the population, they don't need anything more than the 5c offers.
Wish this was the lineup right now
iPhone 5s - 649$
iPhone 5c - iPhone 5 internals, iPod touch casing style with colours - 499$
iPhone 4c - iPhone 4s internals, bump to support LTE, plastic casing with colours - 349$
Every price point, all great phones.
Wish this was the lineup right now
iPhone 5s - 649$
iPhone 5c - iPhone 5 internals, iPod touch casing style with colours - 499$
iPhone 4c - iPhone 4s internals, bump to support LTE, plastic casing with colours - 349$
Every price point, all great phones.
wonder if they will feel pressured to do a price reduction like they did in 2007 or the 5c might be very shortlived.
$100 isnt the biggest amount in the world. its the illusion that they are giving you a choice
iPhone 5C is a much better phone than the S3, I would think anyone would be willing to pay more for it objectively speaking, unless you like the bigger screen size.
You should know better than anyone that the stock price always goes down on launch day. If I remember correctly it went down more last year when the 5 was released, and that was the best selling phone in Apple's history. It went down even more the year before with the 4S release, though that was more likely due to another minor event in Apple's history that coincided with that release.
All I am saying is that people seem to feel that Apple has let them down personally by not releasing a low cost phone today. Yes leave the platform if you want, but shaking your fist and screaming out, "You dirty Apple, you!! You'll get yours! You'll never get my business again!" smacks of a bitterness born of a personal slight, that's all.
The prices in Europe are getting ridiculous.
iPhone 5C
US: $549
Europe: $800
iPhone 5S
US: $699
Europe: $930
No wonder market share is going down the drain in Europe.
The driving market which is the subsidized phone market a $100 is huge. Most of the people buying the phones on contract probably can't even really afford it to begin with. They are stretching it to just pay $99 living paycheck to paycheck. Even if you are buying one outright $100 is $100 no matter how you slice it. Apple has the high end mark and the low end market in mind. Apple will make their record sales as usual.