Isn't that due to the fact new improvements can't be applied to smaller devices? Or what I am saying doesn't make any sense?Sigh, once again Cook shows us his incompetence. Jobs picked the perfect screen size. Only an idiot would change it to a larger size. You would think after seeing so few sales from the 12.9" that he would get the hint that no one likes to carry around a ginormous device. So, instead of making the 9.7" smaller by squeezing the bezel, he went the other way! So now buyers have to chose between big and bigger. The size differential between the two Pro devices are now too narrow. This is just plain dumb.
I was just wondering if, for example, Apple wanted to make the battery last longer, wouldn't that be impossible to do without requiring the iPAD to be different than it is now (consider the IPP 9.7)? In terms of weight? Thickness?
And I agree that when they released the 12.9 model I thought myself "this is going to be a failure". Some will like it, but it will never have the same feedback from the smaller versions. My first iPAD was 4 and then I switched to the Pro 9.7. That is the perfect size, I see no reason to increase it, even though it appears (according to the specs) the new 10.5 it's not thicker and heavier (compared to my IPP 9.7).