I totally agree!
All Apple have done is drop the 2.4Ghz iMac, leaving the model above!
No Core i7 iMacs. Not even Core 2 Quads is pathetic, even with the additional RAM expansion.
If there was 2.8Ghz Core 2 Quad or Core i7 iMac with a user upgradable hard drive capable of 8Gb RAM expansion with a 24" screen and a decent GPU, it would be enough for most people who don't need the expansion of the tower but need a more powerful system than a 2 core iMac with 4Gb RAM limit.
I originally planned on buying a used Mac Mini at some stage, upgrading it a little, then saving for a Mac Pro, safe in the knowledge that I'd be able to spec a 4 core Mac Pro for just over £1,450 at a later date but £1,899 + £20 for a display port to VGA adapter for that now makes that idea impossible.
The £649 mac mini is a waste of money for what you get too, add a keyboard/mouse and you've got a system about £60 cheaper than the 20" 2.4Ghz iMac that's no longer available.
Apple are just not paying attention to what's out there in the PC world so far as consumer machines are concerned and those old 20" iMacs will probably be fetching near new prices as used systems because of all this. If anyone would sell one to start with.
The entry level Mac Mini is a excellent spec for the price though. For a mac mini that is.
Has anyone thought that Nvidia is pulling the strings here and them not having come up with a motherboard (I presume the mobo is nvidia right?) with integrated graphics that can house a mobile quad core? What's the mobo in the top imac, made by who I mean.
Plus, let's also consider that it's a shame they didn't go quad for the 24 inch, I mean, granted they can't go i7 yet due to the tdps and are eyeing arrandale but wtf apple, can't the top end have a quadcore, a f.ing wintel crap laptop has got one...shs.....