Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Really? You actually expected either of those things? They will not be coming back to Mac notebooks, ever, I'd presume. You are going to be waiting a long time my friend.
Still not sure if you are joking or not, though. Better hang on tightly to that 2012.
I'm planning to buy a mac mini instead.
 
It's nearly 2019 and you are still going on about optical discs? It's tech from yesteryear. You can still play them on your DVD player at home but no one wants to carry DVD's around with them anymore! Get with the times.
Uh, no thanks, but congratulations on doing exactly what the media companies (not excluding Apple) want you to do: walk away from a perfectly good copy you've paid for, and get ripped off buying a second copy of the same damn movie. I didn't mind doing that when it was VHS, which had truly awful quality, but there's nothing wrong with DVDs. Or maybe you're twelve, and just starting your collection. In any event, I'm keeping mine.
[doublepost=1540921441][/doublepost]
Uh, no thanks, but congratulations on doing exactly what the media companies (not excluding Apple) want you to do: walk away from a perfectly good copy you've paid for, and get ripped off buying a second copy of the same damn movie. I didn't mind doing that when it was VHS, which had truly awful quality, but there's nothing wrong with DVDs. Or maybe you're twelve, and just starting your collection. In any event, I'm keeping mine.
And by the way, it's not like I'm asking for my Mac to include an optical drive. I'm happy to not lug that around. I just want to be able to read a DVD when the external drive is attached. Which iPads cannot do, and I'm sure Apple will make sure they never can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H818H
No way would I pay £1200 for Apple's base 'low cost notebook'. They obviously think that their user base is big enough. Even the price of the Mini is a big fat kick in the wallet!!!
 
Uh, no thanks, but congratulations on doing exactly what the media companies (not excluding Apple) want you to do: walk away from a perfectly good copy you've paid for, and get ripped off buying a second copy of the same damn movie. I didn't mind doing that when it was VHS, which had truly awful quality, but there's nothing wrong with DVDs. Or maybe you're twelve, and just starting your collection. In any event, I'm keeping mine.

I ripped mine, put them on a Plex server, and threw the DVDs in a bin in the basement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: javisan and 0970373
I found this reveal really confusing. The laptop line-up is now very muddled. I'm in the market for a laptop and desktop combo and the pricing all overlaps not to mention most of the line-up not having been updated for so long.

iMac or Mac Mini. When will they update the iMac? Before 6 months time? Will I buy one and regret it when they silently upgrade them in 2 weeks?

Why is the Macbook Air a better laptop than the Macbook? The Macbooks Airs now have better specs but the Macbooks are more expensive. Why is the old Macbook Air still available!? Is the MBP just a better computer if you're already making the size jump to a Macbook Air?

Why not update the rest of the line? Then there's the looming concept of ARM processors next year or year after which may change everything again anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: javisan and 0970373
As someone who is going back to school. Im not sure if I should stick with my 2014 MacBook Pro, or sell it, and get a Air. Im definitely upgrading my iPad though
 
not to the extent of apple computers. when your number one goals are thinness, looking cool, and being quite you run into issues. modern gaming PC laptops run i7 and i9K version with 1080 ti's with 4k screens and don't suffer issues. they do it by making it thicker, adding vents, and fans. there is no way around it, and apple users think that no one has solved it because apple hasn't, but everyone else has figured it out already.

Wrong. My XPS 13 and Samsung Ultrabook havent had any issues being super thin. The throttling "extent of apple computers" is false.

My razer blade 15 and asus rog zephyrus S disagree with your "they made it thicker, adding vents and fans" BS. They are super thing and get the job done while being hooked up to a 24" 1080p 144hz monitor.

Achieving thinness is possibly and it all depends on the cooling which apple has figured out for the mac mini as seen in previous generations and both Razer and Asus have found a way to do the same.
 
I ripped mine, put them on a Plex server, and threw the DVDs in a bin in the basement.
I haven't ripped my whole collection. There are many discs - especially TV series - that I haven't bothered ripping, but might still want to watch occasionally. I may have to make the rip or dump choice with them all eventually someday - but that day hasn't come yet. Plus, now that I can get used DVDs for $4 because everyone's moved on to the next shiny object, I'm still adding to my collection. :D

Anyway, here I am pointing out something iPads can't do, but Windows machines in the same price range can do, and *I* am the one who's wrong here? Get with the times, indeed! Tell Apple to get with the times and do touchscreen Macs already! Using a trackpad to remotely move a cursor across the screen so you can then click on it is pretty yesterday if you ask me. Since most web pages have been redesigned in the last few years to allow touchscreen operations by smartphone and tablet users, the same thing works pretty well on a laptop. Like I said, both my work Lenovo and my home Chromebook have this, and (although I hate the Chromebook for other reasons) I love this ability, and miss it whenever I'm on a Mac.
 
You saying its a bad thing to have the best of both worlds?

What I'm saying is the MacBook line is a confusing mess compared to how it used to be. A few years ago it was clear cut: MacBook Air was your ultralight ultra-portable machine, MacBook was your regular consumer level notebook, and the MacBook Pro was your high end machine.

Now you've got the MacBook which is smaller and less powerful than the Air yet costs more, so Apple basically cannibalised its own MacBook line with the new Air. And by the traditional naming scheme, the current MacBook should be called the air, while the current Air is more akin to the traditional consumer grade MacBook. Its just a big mess really.

And now the higher end Air is better spec wise (aside from the GPU) than the base 13" Pro for the same price, so now the Air is cannibalising the base model Pro as well.

Basically, the naming scheme is a mess and theres too much overlap spec wise between the 3 notebooks. Apple needs some housekeeping on their lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira and dan110
It's nearly 2019 and you are still going on about optical discs? It's tech from yesteryear. You can still play them on your DVD player at home but no one wants to carry DVD's around with them anymore! Get with the times.

I think you miss the biggest point he was trying to make. In order to use these devices to access data and media that you've already bought, you have to have a subscription to rebuy said media.
The base iPad starts at $329. It is likely the top seller. It’s a steep step up to $799 or even $649 for the 10.5” Pro.


On a side note the base iPad is actually cheaper than the iPad Mini 4.

I was hoping that they'd release an iPad Mini 5. Now, I'm convinced they're gong to sunset that device early 2019.
 
First up, highly disappointed.



Wrong. The current nTB 13'' Pro Model is far superior in performance.



Basically the same. There won't be much difference in processing performance compared to the 7th Gen i-series in the MacBook 12'' inch.



It's an Apple specific Amber-Lake processor:

xFxn3hG.png




From Benchmarks, the new Air is as good as a 2013 13inch MacBook Pro with 22nm Haswell processor...



+1



+1



This upgrade makes no sense. Your new MacBook Air will have a 10% performance boost...at best.



True. This new MacBook Air has reached the performance level of 5-year old MacBook Pros. Hurray...



See above.
10% at best from 1.2GHz base model 2015 12" MacBook? I think it'll be a bit more. Also, upgrading because I'm handing off my 12" to a family member and I'll also benefit from Touch ID, two Thunderbolt 3 ports, and a slightly larger display.

Those complaining about processor power need to realize this machine is not for people that are doing that work. If you need power, get a Pro. As for the price, it was not too long ago that the MacBook Air started at $1,199 and it was the cheapest MacBook you could buy. Don't recall mass hysteria back then about pricing.
 
What I'm saying is the MacBook line is a confusing mess compared to how it used to be. A few years ago it was clear cut: MacBook Air was your ultralight ultra-portable machine, MacBook was your regular consumer level notebook, and the MacBook Pro was your high end machine.

Now you've got the MacBook which is smaller and less powerful than the Air yet costs more, so Apple basically cannibalised its own MacBook line with the new Air. And by the traditional naming scheme, the current MacBook should be called the air, while the current Air is more akin to the traditional consumer grade MacBook. Its just a big mess really.

And now the higher end Air is better spec wise (aside from the GPU) than the base 13" Pro for the same price, so now the Air is cannibalising the base model Pro as well.

Basically, the naming scheme is a mess and theres too much overlap spec wise between the 3 notebooks. Apple needs some housekeeping on their lineup.
I think Apple should remove the 13” nTB Pro since it isn’t much of an upgrade anymore. I was a bit surprised they didn’t just call it the 13” nTB the MacBook Air last year, but I guess they already had the Amber Lake model in the works.

Other than the names, the lineup itself is fine (after removing the 13” nTB). The 12” is the ultraportable. The 13” Air is the mass seller. The 13” TB and 15” are the pro models with quad core.
 
not to the extent of apple computers. when your number one goals are thinness, looking cool, and being quite you run into issues. modern gaming PC laptops run i7 and i9K version with 1080 ti's with 4k screens and don't suffer issues. they do it by making it thicker, adding vents, and fans. there is no way around it, and apple users think that no one has solved it because apple hasn't, but everyone else has figured it out already.
I respect your point of view but here’s here how I see it.
1. The gaming machines are a different product completely and are marketed differently. The biggest difference is portability.
2. The throttling in the mbps aren’t as bad as in the original software release. And they aren’t as bad as people have made them out to be at this point in time. They are still highly usable machines and don’t get throttled to where they can’t be useful.
3. Competing PC laptops, which are largely trying to be thin as well, also throttle and has the same issues as Apple.
4. I agree if Apple added more holes and made them thicker they would do better with heat. But thicker is not what they want to sell. Perhaps more can be done and still be thin but I see their current performance in their respective segment on par with the PCs.
 
I'm amazed they ditched the touch bar on this thing. That alone is a compelling reason to buy this machine. Proper tactile function keys, and a headphone jack!! Great little portable laptop that I'm actually able to plug in my studio monitor headphones to, and finish off an audio mix. Both this and the Mac Mini update are a step back in the right direction. Well done, Apple!
 
So let's see...$1400 for a MacBook Air with 256 GB storage (what would be considered minimal in 2018), another $250 for Apple Care (since you're already sinking a lot of money in this thing), another $50 for adapters to use with the USB-C ports (for card reader, USB-A devices, ethernet)...that's $1700 to have a modestly-spec'd laptop.

But it is thinner. :rolleyes:
 
Get with the times, indeed! Tell Apple to get with the times and do touchscreen Macs already! Using a trackpad to remotely move a cursor across the screen so you can then click on it is pretty yesterday if you ask me.

I think this has become a face-saving thing at Apple. They made their stand on this issue and now won't change.
 
Interesting, what does this mean for the non-tbMPB and just standard MacBook? I feel like this new Air makes them irrelevant.

I was really considering replacing my 10.5 iPad with the new 12.9 iPad. But the new Air is talking to me. I loved a 12" MacBook I used to own. So what is the difference between the new Air and the MacBook?
 
No way am I buying one with this keyboard, it's borderline unusable to type on and people are still reporting tons of failures. They should never have put it into production, but Jobs wasn't there to kill it...

Only Apple makes good trackpads. The old Air was the last laptop made (by any manufacturer) with a good trackpad and a decent keyboard.

It is on its third generation. Every laptop and keyboard they ship uses the butterfly tech. It isn't an oversight or coincidence on their part, and they aren't going back.

I love the new keyboards, but unfortunately those who hate them are going to have to hold out with old laptops and 3rd party keyboards, presumably until Apple comes out with another new keyboard tech.
 
Those complaining about processor power need to realize this machine is not for people that are doing that work. If you need power, get a Pro. As for the price, it was not too long ago that the MacBook Air started at $1,199 and it was the cheapest MacBook you could buy. Don't recall mass hysteria back then about pricing.

Prices have generally come down over time in the computer industry and if this is not a powerful machine for work applications, then one would expect it to be priced accordingly.
 
I was thinking the same thing! In Canada, $1500 for the new Macbook Air, $1730 for the 13" MBP without touch bar, and $1730 for the 12" Macbook. The first two have the same screen size, and weigh almost the same. Some are 8th gen, some are 7th gen, all are relatively underpowered. This makes very little sense.


I really miss Steve's propensity to discontinue old products when new ones arrive. It made everything clean and easy to understand. Tim's approach is likely (much) better for the bottom line, but creates a bevy of problems for product marketing. The 12" MacBook and 13" MacBook Pro without Touch Bar should be scrubbed from the site today. They make very little sense to buy in comparison to the new Air.
 
Why no rounded corners on the screen like the iPad? That would've made it perfect and unique. Maybe they are saving that for the next MacBook Pro upgrade?
Because they don't control the app ecosystem like iOS and can't mandate that app makers accommodate spacing for rounded corners. The moment they do this and things are cropped by the rounded display, the internet will break with outrage. There are also engineering challenges as well. Would be a nice change though.
 
It is using the i5-8200Y processor not the U series.

BTW, there're some doubts: i5-8200Y is a 1.3 GHz processor with 3.9 TB and this MBA's processor is claimed to be 1.6 with 3.6 TB

This "new" MBA is just a rebadged 13" non-TB MBP using a MB processor. Apple has downgraded the CPU from a competent 15W CPU down to a fairly inept 5W CPU.

They should just drop the 13” nTB pro since it isn’t much faster (7th generation U-series vs. 8th Generation Y series). The MacBook didn’t get an update (since it would have been to the same processor in the new Air), and its main selling point is the size. But there is a clear differential now between the MacBook/Air and the Touch Bar Pros.

I don't know how close the 7th-gen U-series is to the 8th-gen, but the U-series clearly outperforms the Y-series in the 8th-gen. Look at the post below from a different thread.

According to the GeekBench Browser:

Amber Lake
Core m3-8100Y - SC: 3885, MC: 7264
Source
Core i5-8500Y - SC: 3909, MC: 8164
Source
Core i7-8500Y - SC: 4784, MC: 8714
Source

Whiskey Lake
Core i5-8265U - SC: 4525, MC: 15,316
Source
Core i7-8565U - SC: 4938, MC: 14,840
Source

If Apple had put Whiskey Lake in the new MBA, I would not complain about the pricing, but as it is ....


I understand that but for gen 3 I disagree. It’s a solid keyboard with few reliability issues.

Has there been a wide spread issue of gen 3 keyboard issues? Anything close to the previous versions?

I think you missed the massive thread here on MR discussing the continuing failure of Apple's butterfly keyboard in its third iteration.


Bs. It’s fantastic to type on. Very satisfing with more than enough travel. You must not have a smart phone. Because if you did your finger bones absolutely would break when sending a text message.

This is personal preference, and as a touch typist I concur with others who cannot comfortably use Apple's new keyboards. This is a huge problem for me and many others who actually type on their laptops.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.