Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We all mock the trashcan Mac Pro, but it was slick and an attractive piece of design.

I think the trashcan Mac Pro design would work well for the Mac Studio though I was hoping they would bring back the cube in metal form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac47
Three CDOs in three years, huh ...?? 🤷🏻😢
Doesn't sound like things are too stable over at the Mothership ....
But whatever: AppleVR better come out in January like Kuo said.
🙏🏻🤞🏻🥲
 
Not surprising at all. She hasn’t done anything since 2019. Nothing bold, nothing new. Everything is just a rehash of Ive’s designs. Even the new iMac (which I think looks great) was apparently created by Jonny Ive.
So what exactly are you looking for? They’re already working on a foldable phone, about to release a VR headset that will lead the market, and are probably developing a bloody car. They gave us FaceID, foresaw the demise of the headphone jack and the SIM slot (in spite of all the whining), and delevoped the soon-to-be-widely-copied Dynamic Island as an entirely novel interactive screen domain which simultaneously hides the front subsystems. You want a triangular iMac? An iPhone that has holes for sparklers? An iPad that crumples up into a tiny ball?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KaliYoni
If you are a really creative person it would be hard to stay on the design team right now. Every current product Apple has is basically reduced to its final physical form. Other than shrinking bezels and making them thinner what's left? We are down to single slabs of glass and aluminum. Foldables don't seem to be a winner yet either given so many trade-offs just for a pro of a larger screen.
That’s the problem with minimalism as a design ethos - once you’ve pared down and cleaned up and polished your design - where do you go? You could go a step too far along the minimalist trajectory and start eliminating features that matter to the fundamental functionality of the device, effectively making the product worse in the interest of visual purity. But the people buying and using the devices may not be altogether happy, which harms the bottom line, if nothing else.

What you probably should do is to give attention to the not-directly-outward-facing aspects. What materials are available, what screen or battery technologies are on the horizon, can internal space be better utilized, can structural integrity be maintained or even improved using less material and/or at lower weight? Sometimes this may yield outwardly noticeable results as well.

Whether you find that interesting as a product designer depends on the individual, I guess.
 
... isn’t it also up to the executives, Tim etc to sign off on designs too?
PRECISELY.
When the maps debacle happened a few years back,
everybody was screaming & yelling at the design team.
But NOBODY, correctly, said:
"Hey, isn't Tim the last guy between Apple and a Best Buy shelf ...?
How in hell did he let this out in this condition ...?"

🤷🏻🙄
 
So I guess the only products Hankey can claim as designed on her watch are the MBA M2 and the Mac Studio?

I actually have held off on buying the Mac Studio because I hate its design. It is the most uninspired metal box Apple has ever produced. Even the Mac Mini is sexier than the Studio.

We all mock the trashcan Mac Pro, but it was slick and an attractive piece of design.
agreed with everything about studio and trashcan. i recently bought a mbp with touchbar b/c new mbp's literally look old! the old design with touchbar looked more modern. studio looked fugly and chunky old box.
 
They need to get rid of Alan Dye, the man is terrible at design.

Dynamic Island is a distracting piece of garbage.

Notification Center swiping up from the bottom portion of the Lock Screen is one of the dumbest things Apple has ever done.

Im embarrassed they have such incompetency.

I can design astronomically better, and everyone would benefit.

They lost simplicity and are now pure complexity. Simplicity is intelligent design, complexity is stupidity in design. A famous quote from Albert Einstein; “If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”

That quote is stating exactly Apple’s design problem; they don’t understand it, so it’s complex, rather than simple. The most-intelligent designs from Apple are the ones that a 5-year-old knows and an 85-year-old knows. Simplicity.
 
Not surprising at all. She hasn’t done anything since 2019. Nothing bold, nothing new. Everything is just a rehash of Ive’s designs. Even the new iMac (which I think looks great) was apparently created by Jonny Ive.
People keep saying here "Ive would never have done this" when a new design comes out for something. And now it is Ive's designs? Please pick one, people!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
The number of people commenting on this article about a HE and not a SHE, just shows how many people comment without even reading the article they are commenting on.
I think it was only 1 or 2 that messed that up, and yes they should've read the article or even just the caption. But the vast majority of the comments are people correcting them 15 times.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: TheLunaPark
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.