This ad is incredibly Apple. It's very on-brand.
The problem is the ad is too literal (with objects breaking) instead of more obvious to the visually metaphor they were going for—having the objects squish down into a compact object, that then reveals itself to be the iPad Pro.
"Everything was big and taking up space → Now its small and thin, ready to fit in a bag."
Behind the scenes, the problem is the ad agency didn't account for literal-thinkers. A lot of creatives are more metaphorical and think in big ideas, skipping over details literal thinkers see with their 20/20 vision. The ad agency needed someone with more literal foresight to object to that detail by the time they were doing storyboards. They wanted to appeal to the meme of the Hydraulic Press Channel so they let things get crushed.
Had they made the ad, for example, movers from a moving company unload a bundle of objects, they see Godzilla, they run, then Godzilla steps on that bundle of objects, and what's left is an iPad Pro, nobody would be up in arms because theres nothing literal to object to.
I've worked for Apple's agency and made Apple ads. But thanks for telling me what an Apple ad is. What it is—that Apple ads have not been—is incredibly tone deaf as indicated by the response to it. What you are indicating is the point. Apple, would have realized this potential for the metaphor to be misconstrued. Apple would have reconcognized the cultural zeitgeist and conversation around technology when making this ad. Apple under Steve Jobs that is. And that would not have been necessarily motivated by some altruism. It would have been motivated by deeply protecting their brand. One they've worked so hard to cultivate and protect. One that they value above all. Would this idea have been pitched—yes absolutely. But the conversation that is being had now in public, would have happened in private and this ad would never have seen the light of day. And that is what is un-Apple about it.
Last edited: