Why? No one’s data was used or collected injuriously. The personal identification data collected was already randomized on arrival. Unless you started every siri interaction with, “hey siri my name is __ and my social security number is ___” there is no way they could even begin to misuse your data
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Apologizes Over Siri Privacy Concerns, Will Resume Grading Program in Fall With Several Changes
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Why? No one’s data was used or collected injuriously. The personal identification data collected was already randomized on arrival. Unless you started every siri interaction with, “hey siri my name is __ and my social security number is ___” there is no way they could even begin to misuse your data
Apples products, which include iOS are better for the privacy focus. Hey, it’s annoying to counter Apple critics who continually criticize Apple over nothing.
This so much. I’d love to be able to submit specific Siri mistakes, kind of like you can report errors in Apple maps. This would be a good option! Then you know exactly what you are sharing.
iOS is substantially better because of privacy, security and App ecosystem. This is a statement of fact, not opinion.
Correct. Jobs never apologized for antennagate just said, “you’re holding it wrong” and gave away cases.
I'd take that over not criticising them for anything. Accountability is extremely important.
But that's typical here. How can one feel good about themselves for the next hour if they can't muster up some aggrandizing faux outrage to start their day?
That would be considered a false trigger. There’s documentation somewhere regarding in the frequency that Siri uses for the voice command “hey Siri.” If the exact words are triggered, Siri will then lower the frequency or threshold after the trigger word to adequately respond or follow through with the command.
In the case for false triggers, the lower frequency is activated, resulting in Siri activating and saying random things. For myself, I had a false trigger last night when I was watching TV, though it was in Spanish. There was obviously something said on the program that sounded similar to “Hey Siri” that caused it to respond with “I have lowered the volume on your HomePod by 20 percent.”
For false triggers, I would be more than happy for Apple or someone else to grade Siri’s performance so something like that doesn’t occur again. Hope this helps.
The solution is simple. Don't willingly give total strangers that much power over your life.
Easy.
Which is exactly what happened WITH the private contractors storing and listening to the requests. If we are going to have a ****** service, it might as well be private.
They aren't hypocrites:
- Sign In with Apple
- Activation Lock
- No More Tracking Kids
- HomeKit Secure Video
- Preventing cross-site trafficking
The Siri grading process is a similar practice across all voice assistants. They should've changed this practice but no-one seemed to care that Amazon and Google were doing it. People kept buying Echo's for every room in their house the seven Prime Day's after the controversy surfaced. You can point at "hypocrisy" all you want but it doesn't mean that Apple isn't trying to fix the privacy issues with tech. It's not always black and white.
Everyone should keep in mind that it was contractors who were violating privacy, not Apple directly (hence why one of their changes is to only use their own people going forward) so I can see how this could've happened without Apple necessarily knowing about it. That doesn't mean they didn't, but given how important privacy and security is to them I have no problem giving them the benefit of the doubt on this one.
With the help of some good old fashioned whistleblowing and investigative journalism, it was brought to their attention, they acted immediately, and have now apologized. Like I don't know what else you people want from them.
With the help of some good old fashioned whistleblowing and investigative journalism, it was brought to their attention, they acted immediately, and have now apologized. Like I don't know what else you people want from them.
I agree that it would have been nice to be transparent, but how else do you grade an AI's performance? With another AI? If another AI is more accurate and can identify errors, then you would be using that instead of Siri.
I find it just weird that people couldn't figure out that if responses were being graded it was going to have to be done by living people who could understand the query perfectly. I guess simple logic isn't so simple.
Amazon allowed opt-out from the start. Apple promises they'll let you do it now they've been caught. BTW they're still tracking kids.
I still think the whole technology is flawed from a privacy and consent point of view. This affects people who have no knowledge or say in the collection of the audio. One family member dictating the policy of a living room. One person in an office deciding if they can be the leak. One person in a relationship deciding if accidental recordings of private time can occur...
It’s not reasonable, IMHO, that one person with concerns has to check if other people are opting-out of audio collections for Siri (or its rivals) just in case they accidentally capture sensitive audio.
I honestly think audio collection of this kind should simply be banned. These companies could employ people with specific jobs in specific locations to improve accuracy, rather than using unpaid consumers with all these problematic privacy and consent issues.
It’s not reasonable, IMHO, that one person with concerns has to check if other people are opting-out of audio collections for Siri (or its rivals) just in case they accidentally capture sensitive audio.
I honestly think audio collection of this kind should simply be banned. These companies could employ people with specific jobs in specific locations to improve accuracy, rather than using unpaid consumers with all these problematic privacy and consent issues.
When did anyone else let your phone's camera be remotely accessed for a month? Game over.
So the guy who reported this must feel like an idiot now. He got a whole group of contractors terminated and that contract appears to no longer be available.
Yes nothing to do with Apple employing them to carry out processes that they weren't willing to stand behind when fully disclosed.
