That used to be the case, but that ended in 2015 (after a huge outcry): https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-ends-tax-exempt-status-after-73-years-3-things-to-know/Technically it's a nonprofit
That used to be the case, but that ended in 2015 (after a huge outcry): https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-ends-tax-exempt-status-after-73-years-3-things-to-know/Technically it's a nonprofit
In my age group, 35 or younger… I don’t know a single person who consumes over the air media.Upgrading what now? Why would Apple upgrade the equipment for CBS, Fox, ABC and NBC? Why would they upgrade the broadcast facilities in 32 stadiums to make them 4K capable, or buy the mobile production units for the previous 4 bohemoths? These are productions of those networks, they wouldn’t be broadcasting anything - they’d be rebroadcasting those companies feeds.
Sunday Ticket is a massive money sink. It doesn’t need to be a bigger one. Most games are free over the air - your target market is out of market fans for other teams, who will often watch their game they can’t see then likely revert to broadcast after. The only way DirecTV possibly makes a dime on the paltry 2 million subscribers it gets, is by selling them the whole TV package. That’s what Apple wants. To offer it for much cheaper than DirecTV charges and target higher than 2 million additional subscribers.
I think the better value and option is for Apple to consider acquiring rights to the NBA. The league in the younger demographic 18-35 is trending higher while the same group is trending lower when it comes to the NFL.![]()
Report: Apple bows out of Sunday Ticket talks, leaving Amazon and Google as the finalists
The company once regarded as the frontrunner for NFL Sunday Ticket has opted to take a Sunday drive, instead.profootballtalk.nbcsports.com
Then the NFL along with all other sports are dead to me. These ppl are charging 150$ per year (here in Canada) which is absolutely ridiculous. All about the happy medium, these sports leagues are running rampant with pricingConsumers who don’t want to pay are irrelevant. As they should be.
Well have you seen player salaries? Someone has to pay for those, and it sure as **** isn't going to be the owner. Fans cheer on when a guy signs a $300 million contract and don't realize they'll be paying that salary via higher tv subscription prices, ticket prices, concessions, etc.these sports leagues are running rampant with pricing
That's true but only if the fan goes to the games. If you stay home and watch it on TV or at a Sports Bar, you don't pay for their salaries.Well have you seen player salaries? Someone has to pay for those, and it sure as **** isn't going to be the owner. Fans cheer on when a guy signs a $300 million contract and don't realize they'll be paying that salary via higher tv subscription prices, ticket prices, concessions, etc.
Who offered these players these wages in the first place? They offer them the money and then foot the bill to the fans? Even more reason not to watchWell have you seen player salaries? Someone has to pay for those, and it sure as **** isn't going to be the owner. Fans cheer on when a guy signs a $300 million contract and don't realize they'll be paying that salary via higher tv subscription prices, ticket prices, concessions, etc.
The only time sports bug me is when they are in a LiveTV streaming service that doesn't make them separate, so the pricing spikesIt doesn’t matter to me whether it’s free or if they charge an arm and leg. Hell, I don’t even care what streaming platform the NFL decides to go with. I’m still going to watch just as many games as I always do. None.
This is mostly the same as other pricing. The fans with money coming our their ears don't care about the price. They have the $$$ so they pay, driving up prices up so the less well off fans can't afford it anymore.Who offered these players these wages in the first place? They offer them the money and then foot the bill to the fans? Even more reason not to watch
I'm 50, and I don't like the cable companies because of the stupid equipment and the ridiculous price spikes periodically. Not that the live TV with many channels are much better today. Was great when they started at like $30-40 but now they are at least double. We just do our Frndly and bounce amongst the movie ones. If something we want to watch comes on, we sub a month. $5 is probably still less than digitally renting a movie anymore, plus you can watch whatever you want for the rest of the month. And we also have D+, Hulu, ESPN+ included with VZW, so we are set for like $10/month.In my age group, 35 or younger… I don’t know a single person who consumes over the air media.
Anecdotal. Yes. But it says something to me at least.