In what store do the customers need to pay for a premium device to get into the store, the manufacturers have to pay $99 per year in order to have a chance at selling their stuff at the store and where most of the products are free?Why shouldn't it be the developers responsibility? This is akin to buying software from a store. There is always some sort of markup by the store that allows them to profit from the sale. The Apple app store is no different. You may not like the markup charged by Apple but this is directly analogous to buying software from a store.
That version isn't live yet. They approved the bugfix version which allegedly was against the rules.Just downloaded the app. No trial - presented with just a login.
Are you saying you know better than Apple's Board of Directors?!?!? (;Umm.. Schiller isn't the CEO, I believe he's VP of Marketing.
In what store do the customers need to pay for a premium device to get into the store, the manufacturers have to pay $99 per year in order to have a chance at selling their stuff at the store and where most of the products are free?
[automerge]1592841582[/automerge]
That version isn't live yet. They approved the bugfix version which allegedly was against the rules.
I think it should be 100% at Apples discretion to approve and reject whatever they want for any reason.
it’s their platform. They built it. That’s my opinion on the legal matter.
Morally, I think it’s good that developers speak up. 30% is a huge cut. Would be fair to take a little bit less. But that should be done voluntarily not forced.
"Imbox" 🤣🤣
Not when it's a duopoly in many markets. It's just bad for competition. The closer a market is to being perfectly competitive, the more efficient it becomes.
I’ve been using HEY for several days and I just don’t understand why everybody thinks it’s so amazing.
All of this drama about their App Store rejection has totally obscured the conversation about the value versus other paid options.
It’s an incredibly simplistic take on email that really is not going to be useful for a ton of people that are normally in the demographic of paying email customers/users.
It seems specifically geared towards people that perhaps are prominent or popular and just have an unbelievable massive firehose of email coming in every single day and Hey is built around helping triage that.
If that doesn’t fit your description I think you’re gonna notice a lot of missing features.
I’ve just been completely mesmerized by all these people online tripping over themselves to try to get an invite. It is not that revolutionary folks… Calm down…
Brian Chen had a very good balanced take
It would be a monopoly if the only way to run an App was to go through the AppStore but we're not there yet. Right now, the AppStore is like a premium. Apple eve allows deploying your own applications through Xcode so there are no restrictions for open-source and home-brew apps.
- The Imbox: It’s not a typo
Everyone hates their bloated inbox, so HEY has a focused Imbox instead. Your Imbox is where important, immediate emails go from people or services you care about. No random receipts, no “I rarely read these” newsletters, and no special offers crowding out the stuff you really care about.
Did I say that? I’m just pointing out that the original statement - that you can’t deny service for any reason - is false.and you find that is a good thing for a society?
Sideloading via Xcode is fairly new (like 5 years ago) and restricted to a single app per user which expires in 7 days unless you have a $99/year developer account. It also requires a Mac. Compare that to experience of sideloading an Android app.
So yeah, technically, you could do that. In practice no one does.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anything stating that offering a trial period suddenly makes it acceptable not to offer in-app billing for subscriptions?By reading the developer guidelines? Section 3.1.3(a)?
- The Imbox: It’s not a typo
Everyone hates their bloated inbox, so HEY has a focused Imbox instead. Your Imbox is where important, immediate emails go from people or services you care about. No random receipts, no “I rarely read these” newsletters, and no special offers crowding out the stuff you really care about.
Thanks for an actual understanding of what this email app does that warrants $99/year in their thinking.
Sounds like they are doing the work of creating smart folders and rule-based sorting of email for the user, if I'm understanding correctly. If that is the case, once you have it set up in Outlook, you don't have to think about it again. It definitely saves from the deluge of emails that come in daily when managing projects or teams. Outlook may cost, but you also get the the other Office apps included and still cheaper than the cost of Hey.
Grown ups find good solutions.KidsMR posters whine.
Sounds like they are doing the work of creating smart folders and rule-based sorting of email for the user, if I'm understanding correctly.
I’m going to guess Cook had words with Schiller to the effect of get this sorted out before WWDC starts.
Because then it has functionality that doesn’t require payment.Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anything stating that offering a trial period suddenly makes it acceptable not to offer in-app billing for subscriptions?
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anything stating that offering a trial period suddenly makes it acceptable not to offer in-app billing for subscriptions?
So, on June 18th when Phil Shiller said that Apple would not change it’s decision on “Hey” - was that just “chin music”?
Just downloaded the app. No trial - presented with just a login.
Yes you missed the part where guidelines require some functionality, the app lacked any functionality when it was first released, and now it does.
It seems specifically geared towards people that perhaps are prominent or popular and just have an unbelievable massive firehose of email coming in every single day and Hey is built around helping triage that.
Except that with many apps in the App Store being free and devs setting the price of purchase for functionality within their apps, how are consumers harmed?![]()
Duopoly: Definition in Economics, Types, and Examples
In a duopoly, two companies own all or nearly all of the market for a given product or service. A duopoly is the most basic form of an oligopoly.www.investopedia.com
What Is a Duopoly?
A duopoly is a situation where two companies together own all, or nearly all, of the market for a given product or service. A duopoly is the most basic form of oligopoly, a market dominated by a small number of companies. A duopoly can have the same impact on the market as a monopoly if the two players collude on prices or output. Collusion results in consumers paying higher prices than they would in a truly competitive market, and it is illegal under U.S. antitrust law.