Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This exactly, and in actual fact, the description fits me, not the prominent or popular part, the massive firehose of email. It absolutely does make triage quicker and visually better but it's not something I am 'OMG, life-changing'.

Nice to have? Yes, but not really $99 of nice and without it allowing me to use a custom domain, useless.

Also, I find it to be potentially problematic that they are very upfront about the fact that it will never be supportive of something like IMAP.

I don’t know - it just seems like that is a cop out to some extent. I think they could be supporting that and still enabling the majority of their features.

Their super minimalistic and very opinionated user interface is not to my loving.
The Feed view for instance I find to be awful.

I will give them credit for being upfront about the fact that they know they won’t appeal to everybody and they are hopeful this encourages change with other email providers.

I am hopeful that FastMail might adopt some of the better points here. On the whole I totally love FastMail because it is exceptionally feature rich and very versatile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeeW
...
How Apple picks which developers they do this to is sort of arbitrary as far as I can tell, but they basically do it to whoever can't fight back. Uber can use an outside payment processor, but Hey can't. There is no logic that makes sense here, it's just Uber is big and Hey isn't.
...
Except that apps such as Uber, and I'll mention the LIRR and New Jersey Transit app fall into this category as well, the payment is for a future service and does not unlock any functionality within the app. Not to mention, these apps allow a sign-up option within the app. My guess is there is a class of apps with these similar exemptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist
I honestly think that is one of the dumbest choices they made.
Considering the only other two main areas are “the feed“ which is very limited in how you can use it and the paper trail which is simply a catchy name for a folder/tag…

The “Imbox” is by no means focused, particularly with no way to clear the running river of “previous” emails below the fold.
[automerge]1592843410[/automerge]


You bet.

I really just want to try to have more conversations about what is actually the offering here and get over this App Store stuff.

Everybody is raving about the simplicity and the on boarding process.

Well - guess how many times I do an on boarding process?
Once

And so much of what else they are doing can easily be accomplished for with smart/dumb folders and disabling remote images by default (enable for contacts) kills most spy pixel tracking issues.

My prediction is that in a couple weeks time when many more users finally get a chance to get in the system, we’re going to see a lot more stories about how bare-bones limited this is and very difficult for power users who are accustomed to having all sorts of different interesting set ups for their email operations.

Agreed.

All of this is hype by Basecamp and the owner to get their app noticed. Plain and simple. They were struggling before because anyone who already uses Outlook beyond the basic email reader won't find value in Hey and then you have several cleaner free email apps that don't charge for those who need basic email. I haven't found another email app yet that touches Outlook when it comes to the use case described. I tried several to help me sort and clean up my errant Yahoo mailbox (have 200K unread emails alone). Outlook is the only one that can get it done.

I also love that Outlook blocks pictures by default so you can decide if you want to download them or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
You get the 14 day trial online only. Its still invite only right now

I agree it seems like a stupid hill for Apple to die on if that was the workaround.
[automerge]1592843965[/automerge]


Download the app. There is no functionality. You're presented with a sign in screen.
Yes, they allowed that in exchange for the promise that the next update coming soon will add the free account. Apple does that all the time - they tell you "this is a problem. we'll let it slide but you must fix for next revision." Happened to me twice.
 
Just to be clear they aren’t really doing any of this for you until you initially set it up for every single user or sender.

The onboarding and getting things working correctly takes lots and lots and lots of work.

In fact, several days into it, I don’t see how this is less work than just setting up smart folders and rules for senders over time using all the normal tools of other email systems.

Well, hell, then I can just use Outlook and do the work myself! LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Brilliant....followed advice from Apple’s very first email - how hard was that? Now they have exactly the same functionality as the Fastmail app, which was approved long ago and with minimal fanfare.

If anybody wants truly private email however, have a look at ProtonMail which actually provides a service worth paying for.
 
Easy to say, harder to prove, imo. I never felt like I was being harmed...as a matter of fact the information provided to me about the app I had on the app store was very useful.

Sure, but deciding whether it's useful enough to justify a 30 percent cut should be your call, not Apple's. If you want to sell mac software, you can sell it on any old place. (I haven't used the Apple store to buy software in quite some time. Granted, many of my purchases are games, and there are at least three well established game markets-- gog, steam, and epic)

But if you want to sell ios software, there is no other option but to sell on the appstore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist
Sure, but deciding whether it's useful enough to justify a 30 percent cut should be your call, not Apple's. If you want to sell mac software, you can sell it on any old place. (I haven't used the Apple store to buy software in quite some time. Granted, many of my purchases are games, and there are at least three well established game markets-- gog, steam, and epic)

But if you want to sell ios software, there is no other option but to sell on the appstore.
Yep, that's the system for IOS. As a dev you have to decide if the IOS app store and walled garden is right for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WiseAJ
Sounds like a barrier to entry.
There are always barriers of entry in all walks of life, for all types of situations. This is just one on a laundry list of items that have to be considered. So it's automatically not a negative.
[automerge]1592848919[/automerge]
Apple thinks this ends their anti-dev Crap Store policies.

It doesn't.
Maybe this will weed out the developers who want to foist a less than ideal experience for their potential customers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1144557
iOS 14: Set Default Email And Browser Apps

They approved Hey today because the overwhelming snark would have consumed the message.

(And they'd be dealing with another lawsuit).
 
So, on June 18th when Phil Shiller said that Apple would not change it’s decision on “Hey” - was that just “chin music”?
No idea what you’re referring to as “chin music”. Schiller clearly told Hey they would be approved if they added a time-limited trial as others have done.

Hey and that ass ddh caved 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1144557
iOS 14: Set Default Email And Browser Apps

They approved Hey today because the overwhelming snark would have consumed the message.

(And they'd be dealing with another lawsuit).
Hey caved like cheap suit and agreed to put sign in functionality into the app. Caving is less costly than a lawsuit that can be hit or miss.
 
Fastmail is probably worth it. Not sure about Hey.
Fastmail seems a lot more reasonable with plans at $30, $50 and $90.

Except for the $30 plan, Fastmail supports email for yourdomain.com. Maybe I misunderstood an earlier post, but iirc with Hey you have to use a hey.com email address; no thanks.
 
Because then it has functionality that doesn’t require payment.
That's not in the paragraph that you mentioned (3.1.3a). Where do the guidelines say that apps offering "functionality that doesn't require payment" can offer subscriptions without offering in-app billing, even if they are not "Reader apps"?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.