Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They didn't do anything that hurts Apple. They received a developer unit, then posted a teardown. They likely reassembled it and it probably still works fine, so I doubt they "destroyed" something they were given for free to show the teardown.

If this had been a free pre-release iPhone and they had filmed drop tests and other obvious things to show they only got it to destroy it and not to use it for development, that would be different. But all they did was take it apart and snap some photos.

I believe strongly in the mantra of "If an activity doesn't hurt anyone, it shouldn't be disallowed."
Sounds just like that kid in the class who cheated on the test and claims that it did not hurt anyone...
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEK and bronzi
Who cares either way. It was well within Apple's right to do this, and iFixit isn't complaining or raising a big storm about it. They just said they will focus on their mobile site instead, now that the app is no longer available.
 
Hard for the apple fanboys to defend this, huh?
I'm not an Apple fanboy, but hard to defend what? Penalizing a company that violated an NDA they signed with you by revoking the entire contract that agreement was attached to? That seems pretty easy to defend. I'd do exactly the same thing if I signed an NDA with somebody and they violated it.

Being an individual, I'd probably also be really angry at them, and publicly say that they can't be trusted for violating an agreement they signed with me, but I'm not a multinational corporation. Apple's not saying anything publicly, they're not suing them, they just revoked the account that violated their terms. Pretty simple.

What would be the correct, "defensible" behavior here? To not make anybody sign NDAs? Fat chance doing business in the modern world that way. Ignore it when somebody blatantly violates an NDA? That's an awful precedent to set as a business, and what's the point of even making people sign them in that case. Only ding developers when they do something really egregious in violating an NDA? What's more egregious than tearing down a piece of NDA'd, pre-release hardware so you can post photos and analysis of the internals on the web?

I actually love iFixIt and use their site regularly--and will continue to--but I genuinely don't see how anybody can feel sorry for them in this. Even if you think Apple shouldn't have NDAs on development hardware in the first place, they do. The developer account comes with the restriction "don't do this", so if you do that, you get your account revoked. Seems extremely simple to me, and I'd expect the same from pretty much any entity in a similar position.

They took a gamble with a contract violation and lost. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEK, bronzi and jwm
Lol, oh well, learn your lesson and move on. You tore down unreleased hardware - what did you expect, a gold medallion? Learn some respect for people's IP, you could easily have waited a month or two, but the modern way is everyone has to be seen to be "FIRST! EXCLUSIVE!".

Silly generation. No respect.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HEK
They deserved on this one and I don't like their arrogance following either. There'd be nothing lost to do what they do after it has gone public. Pulling one apart at this point is just wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEK
Doesn't really matter which company's conditions were violated. This was a failing of integrity in iFixit's decision to ignore a signed agreement.
So! Why should we care, you're worried about a 2 billion dollar company, they don't care about you, regardless what Timmy says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atlantico
They deserved on this one and I don't like their arrogance following either. There'd be nothing lost to do what they do after it has gone public. Pulling one apart at this point is just wrong.
Don't get your knickers in a knot, you'll hurt yourself.
 
Everything someone posts in a forum is their point of view, that's the whole point.

I admire Apple for standing their ground, but being punitive is immature and unbecoming of a big company, particularly one that always claims to be on high moral ground.
Life is punitive. Deal with the repercussions. If you sign a NDA, contract, etc you give your word. If your word doesn't mean anything, what kind of person, company, etc are you? It's called principles and they knew better....
 
Hard for the apple fanboys to defend this, huh?
Apple fanboys, never upset them, it's like taking a Teddybear from a baby, love you iFixit, hope to see you do even more tear downs.

Coming to these forums for the sole purpose of complaining about everything Apple has done, is doing, and ever will do doesn't exempt you from the responsibility of understanding what an "NDA" is before attempting to comment on one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalWizrd and jwm
iFixIt is part of quite a nascent movement of makers and fixers. There's a groundswell building up of people who aren't happy with the disposable culture we have here in the west.

This movement may come to nothing, who knows, but it'd be a mistake to write off iFixIt as a bunch of cranks or geeky specialists pursuing a narrow agenda.

I think iFixIt is invaluable in exposing how Apple puts its hardware together, and showing that it again goes against this tide of people wanting to fix, repair and reuse, rather than dispose of. Who knows, maybe Apple might like to tune-in and take onboard some of the criticisms rather than taking such a hard line. Maybe this is why Apple banned them -- they can't handle the truth!
You are absolutely wrong. This has nothing to do with exposing ifixit as cranks. What they are is liars and untrustworthy. They has a simple agreement, don't disclose information before a certain date. After that date they can show and say what they want.

They received a unit to help with their app development. They could have even taken it apart and held the information till when they agreed to release it. Instead for their own profit, not some altruistic agenda, they breeched the contract releasing the info early. Period! I wouldn't ever give them any more hardware early again. Plenty of other developers that keep their agreement deserve the devices more than fixit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwm
I was gonna be like, "whoa, Apple! Calm down!" till I realized what the teardown was for. Not surprised it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uid15
To all the idiots saying "uh you Apple stop banning innocent people", you do realize that iFixit broke the rules by publicly discussing the device, when they only received it to make apps? I won't really blame iFixit that much, but it's not Apple's fault either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NDA = "Non Disclosure Agreement". If that simple phrase needs explaining to people, there's not much hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HEK
Anyway, let's get back to work, what do people think about El Capitan, or is this the iPod forum.
 
This just reinforces the view I've always had that Apple is a ****** company that makes great products.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.