Apple Begins Selling LumaForge Shared Servers With Up to 200TB Storage and Prices Up to $50,000

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Dec 12, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    LumaForge today announced that its Jellyfish shared storage solutions are now available for purchase from Apple's online business store, with ultra-high capacities up to 200TB at ultra-high prices of up to $50,000 in the United States.

    [​IMG]

    Jellyfish servers enable video production teams working on Macs to collaborate throughout the content creation process. Designed by professional filmmakers, editors, and colorists, LumaForge says the Jellyfish is compatible with major pro video and audio apps like Final Cut Pro X, Premiere Pro, and DaVinci Resolve.

    There are three shared storage solutions:Jellyfish Mobile - 32TB for $11,995.95 or 80TB for $19,995.95: Portable enclosure designed for small teams or teams without a server room infrastructure. Four 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports. Four 1-Gigabit Ethernet ports. 2,300 MBps available bandwidth. Enough to power 4K-8K workflows.
    Jellyfish Tower - 120TB for $39,995.95: Designed for teams that have larger capacity needs. It's the size of a large PC tower. Eight 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports. Eight 1-Gigabit Ethernet ports. 4,400 MBps available bandwidth.
    Jellyfish Rack - 200TB for $49,995.95: Identical in functionality to the Tower, but designed to easily fit into existing server racks.Macs can be connected directly to a Jellyfish server using standard 1- or 10-Gigabit Ethernet cables. Once connected, the Jellyfish Desktop App for macOS automatically completes the setup process. All three have RAID protection.

    LumaForge said that more than 200 companies, including Activision, Adobe, BBC, CBS Interactive, Disney, Google, NASA, Pandora, Reuters, Sony, and WeWork, rely on Jellyfish servers for video storage and collaboration.

    In related news, LumaForge announced that Steve Bayes has made a significant financial investment in LumaForge and will join its newly formed Board of Advisors. Bayes was the senior product manager of Final Cut Pro at Apple for more than 12 years before retiring from the company in July 2018.

    Article Link: Apple Begins Selling LumaForge Shared Servers With Up to 200TB Storage and Prices Up to $50,000
     
  2. bstpierre macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
  3. SecuritySteve macrumors 6502a

    SecuritySteve

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2017
    Location:
    California
    #3
    Apple moving into the server market?! What have we come to ...
     
  4. djlythium macrumors 6502a

    djlythium

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2014
  5. iVoid macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #5
    "Jellyfish Mobile - 32GB for $11,995.95 or 80TB for $19,995.95"

    I assume you mean 32TB.
    32GB is pretty small for disk storage these days. :)
     
  6. adamjackson macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    #6
    xserve?
     
  7. SecuritySteve macrumors 6502a

    SecuritySteve

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2017
    Location:
    California
    #7
    Apple's site has 32TB as an option, not 32GB
     
  8. justperry macrumors G3

    justperry

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Location:
    In the core of a black hole.
    #8
    xServe 2.0;)
     
  9. mrat93 macrumors 65816

    mrat93

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    #9
    Nah that sounds right in line with Apple’s pricing on storage.
     
  10. wigby macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    #10
    As someone else already pointed out...Xserve.

    But also, Apple is going to be increasingly relying on revenue from services. Reselling expensive video servers is hardly a revenue win for Apple here but it's a small step in that direction. A few years from now, Apple could be competing directly with Amazon, Google and Microsoft over worldwide server marketshare.
     
  11. ArtOfWarfare, Dec 12, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2018

    ArtOfWarfare macrumors G3

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #11
    That's about inline with what Apple charges.

    These storage volumes sound kind of insane to me. Isn't a TB good for hundreds of hours of raw footage? What are you working on where you need immediate access to tens of thousands of hours of raw footage?

    I'm under the impression that there's another, cheaper solution for archiving petabytes of stuff just for incase, where being able to have dozens of people access it is... not a requirement.

    Edit: I am being told that a TB is not good for hundreds of hours of footage - people are telling me it's good for between half a minute and 90 minutes.
     
  12. thenewyorkgod macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2011
    #12
    Have you forgotten these?

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Simmias macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    #13
    I ordered three of the 200TB models to back up my photo and adult video collections.
     
  14. MacLawyer macrumors demi-god

    MacLawyer

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    #14
    This makes sense. Apple is quietly moving into the enterprise, if we are to believe the press reports.
     
  15. justperry macrumors G3

    justperry

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Location:
    In the core of a black hole.
    #15
    Why is this even news...:rolleyes:

    Very...VERY few people here on MR are in the market for this if any at those prices.

    And then those prices

    $ XX,995.95

    Bloody hell, I would never buy from a company which have similar pricing, if I need things like this I would say to the seller, make that $1000 less.
     
  16. ronno macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    #16
    Yeah, I'll take the 32GB version for $12K. I'll need 6 of these just to backup what's on my iPhone though...that could add up to real money.
     
  17. WestonHarvey1 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #17
    The article was fixed awhile ago. Is this thread going to be nothing but 32GB jokes?
     
  18. adamjackson macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    #18
    but this isn't an Apple product. That's like saying Newegg is getting into servers for having servers for sale on their site.
     
  19. iapplelove macrumors 601

    iapplelove

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Location:
    East Coast USA
  20. richard371 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    #20
    Ordered a 10. Hopefully Siri will be faster and more reliable on my HomePod now :)
     
  21. WestonHarvey1 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #21
    It is interesting because Apple is selling something in a product category it doesn't usually participate in.
     
  22. phr0z3n macrumors member

    phr0z3n

    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    #22
    Only three?

    I need three just to get one genre of my adult video collection backed up.

    4K HDR is a game changer folks.
     
  23. djeeyore25 macrumors 6502

    djeeyore25

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2014
    Location:
    New York City
    #23
    Someday we'll have 200TB in our iPhones and laugh about how much storage used to cost.
     
  24. thisisnotmyname macrumors 68000

    thisisnotmyname

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Location:
    known but velocity indeterminate
    #24
    At $50k it's not a huge jump to get into a real SAN rather than whatever this little appliance is. This seems like a very niche product.

    edit to add: and if you think about just the cost of raw storage in these they have a very significant margin for something that seems like a pretty basic NAS appliance with some 10GbE ports.
     
  25. dannyyankou macrumors 604

    dannyyankou

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Location:
    Scarsdale, NY
    #25
    I mean I get that these are not for consumers, but they’re charging $375 per terabyte. That’s a bit excessive.
     

Share This Page