You think too much of your foot.
No comment.
Weak quips are the replies of those without a proper argument.
Last edited:
You think too much of your foot.
No comment.
And almost all those people who are doing the judging could donate half of their income to charity and still live a very comfortable live compared to those starving or dying of preventable disease or are kept from education & stuck living in ignorance and poverty and squalor.1. No deal. People are never going to stop harshly judging the people on one hand who blow enormous sums on frivolities while the people on their other hand are starving and dying of preventable disease and are kept from education & stuck living in ignorance and poverty and squalor.
Weak quips are the replies of those without a proper argument.
He was dressed in Business Casual Attire and said it was his only delivery today. He was not in a UPS truck.
1. No deal. People are never going to stop harshly judging the people on one hand who blow enormous sums on frivolities while the people on their other hand are starving and dying of preventable disease and are kept from education & stuck living in ignorance and poverty and squalor. All the socioeconomic justifications for it you can dream up will never convince people you've got a sound ethical leg to stand on.
2. That's not a need, that's a want. Your want does not equal other people's need.
The point is that at some point excess has got to be morally wrong. ... If you're wasting huge sums of money just because you can, you're a bad person. Isn't this common sense?
What I'm conveying is that the edition is just a standard apple watch with a gold shell made by foreign peasants.
Anyone that pays 17k for that is a horrible human being.
What I'm conveying is that the edition is just a standard apple watch with a gold shell made by foreign peasants.
Anyone that pays 17k for that is a horrible human being.
And how much will the car be worth in 5 years ?
Lmao racist , China is known for the biggest counterfeit of goods. China does not have a good reputation and are affiliated with cheap products . That's why Apple doesn't put made in China on there products. Wonder why they put designed in California on there products ? It's much more appealing then seeing made in China. They put assembled in China designed in California. the only companie I know that does that. Companies don't manufacture here because they can pay people in China penny's on the dollar compared to here. Get your facts straight. Then you have huge tax rate here for business.
Rolexs hold there value.
To be able to spend the price of a car on a watch that will be obsolete in 5 years....that's another world.
Congratulations on your purchaseHere you go!
Just as long as he remembered to serve it on a silver platter.
Good luck with that. What's he going to do when the iPhone iOS and Apple Watch OS get updated past what it supports and is no longer compatible? It'll only be worth the gold it's made of then.
Unfortunately it's not a watch that can be collected. It won't last forever more like a quality swiss mechanical watch will with the proper care and servicing. His best bet is to sell it now at a premium where the buyer won't have to wait however many weeks to get it from Apple.
First of all why someone of to be a horrible human being just because they bought a AW Edition? Wow! You really need to do some soul searching. And thank GOD you are not a peasant, most be nice. Well the last time I checked, some of the greatest minds, athletes, engineers etc. came from humble beginnings.
Its so sad some of the comments that I read on here. So everyone else except for China, has the ability to make something beautiful. News flash if everyone is given the same opportunity in all areas of life. Well let's say things would be different. Because all of us if given the chance and resources.
Can do anything we put out minds to, all of us have the ability to do great things yes even the Foreign peasants. Think about that for awhile, also Rolex, Movado, Tag, your finest mechanical time peices. Been around for a long time and are beautiful. And now you have the AW which I think is also beautiful.
Now saying that I think it would be fair if someone wants to spend 17k on a AW. A mean people are going to buy something that is beautiful and useful to them that's just the way it is. And it doesn't matter to them if u think they are horrible human beings for doing so. Someone would probably think negative of you for buying a Rolex or any other expensive time piece for that matter.
In the end I think people can buy what ever they want as long as they are happy with there purchase, and it doesn't make them an horrible human for doing so.
The time–keeping mechanism and electronics inside the $399 model is exactly the same as the $16,000 model. The only difference is the golden watchband. Apple's Cook knows this, too. Why would Cook OK an idea to sell the exact same watch body, pricing higher only for a gold watchband? I'll wait for some media smart aleck to present the question for Cook to answer some day.
At a certain point the excess becomes morally wrong.
If you waste huge sums of money showing utter excess, you're a horrible person. Buying a rolex is an excess. Buying an Edition is even more of an excess. A rolex will last forever if taken care of. You could pass it on to your kids. The Edition will be obsolete in a few years. There are degrees of excess.
Yes, you can spend your money on what you want but only to a degree. At a certain point the excess becomes morally wrong. I'm not sure where that point is, but the Edition seems to certainly be over the line.
If you have so much money that you feel totally comfortable blowing it on an Edition, you need to give more to charity. Because if you have this much money, you have way way way too much freaking money!