Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[/COLOR]

That's completely wrong. The design efforts that went into the watch is craftsmanship. Jonny I've is correct, there's no difference between a guy sitting in a room working with tools and building a computer that wields tools to manufacture the watch. The design put into the logic boards, and the related parts is just a different kind of craftsmanship. They must still be manufactured and assembled, perhaps with even greater care than the mechanical watch. Doesn't matter that a robot designed and constructed by a human does the work, instead of an individual. And in the end humans do assemble the final peices, some of which require just as much care as any precision mechanical watch.

Oh please do not try and compare a computer with a wrist strap to a mechanical watch. It's chalk and cheese. Ones made by a robot in a factory (which part is hand assembled? Attaching the strap doesn't count), one is meticulously assembled, hundreds if not thousands of parts, all set in place by one man. Clicking a few wires into place which only go in one way does not require the precision of a mechanical watch.
 
Oh please do not try and compare a computer with a wrist strap to a mechanical watch. It's chalk and cheese. Ones made by a robot in a factory (which part is hand assembled? Attaching the strap doesn't count), one is meticulously assembled, hundreds if not thousands of parts, all set in place by one man. Clicking a few wires into place which only go in one way does not require the precision of a mechanical watch.
Hand assembly does not make anything better. Just because my Mother spends days assembling a 1000 piece puzzle of the Mona Lisa, doesn't mean that I want to frame it and hang it on my wall. Even a low quality print is better than that.

Jong Ive is correct, using robotic tools is no different than than a man sitting at a table manually using the same tools. If you can't see the parallels of assembling all those chips and circuits on a logic board, then there's no point in discussing this further. The best craftsman in the world couldn't accomplish the assembly of such a complex piece of hardware by hand.
 
I'd be interested to know if the edition is hallmarked or not because in the UK and Europe if it isn't hallmarked the gold will be worth about the same as aluminium foil, making the watch the same value as the normal Apple Watch with a sports band.

Just a thought :D
 
Last edited:
Hand assembly does not make anything better. Just because my Mother spends days assembling a 1000 piece puzzle of the Mona Lisa, doesn't mean that I want to frame it and hang it on my wall. Even a low quality print is better than that.

Jong Ive is correct, using robotic tools is no different than than a man sitting at a table manually using the same tools. If you can't see the parallels of assembling all those chips and circuits on a logic board, then there's no point in discussing this further. The best craftsman in the world couldn't accomplish the assembly of such a complex piece of hardware by hand.

No, but it's one of the sole reasons why Rolex and similar are so expensive. There's zero reason for apples over inflated Chinese junk because that's what it is.
Oh where was your watch made? Switzerland.
Oh where was your watch made? China. But it's got some gold on it! And? Still made in China. Would a Ferrari be a Ferrari if it was made in China? No. Would a Rolls Royce be a Rolls Royce if it was made in China? No. People would stop buying them if they started assembling these things in China.

As for the craftsmanship behind logic boards, they're printed. Nothing technical about that. Logic boards for computers are produced by the tens of thousands daily. As are the inner of any apple watch. The inside of the apple watch edition Is identical to that of the cheapest watch sport. Zero difference. So the 10k+ price tag has got absolutely nothing to do with that.

Edit: here's a much more complex motherboard being made. Takes 10 minutes from start to finish including boxing with all the cables/booklets etc and packaged for shipping. Look how easy those chips are put onto the board. You literally just push it in. Even I didn't realise it was that easy. : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdGW1xE6d_k



----------

I'd be interested to know if the edition is hallmarked or not because in the UK and Europe if it isn't hallmarked the gold will be worth about the same as aluminium foil, making the watch the same value as the normal Apple Watch with a sports band.

Just a though :D

Apparently both the gold on the strap and the actual watch are hallmarked.
 
Last edited:
Dude it's not hard to understand that if you make a million dollars a year or a minute or whatever that you wouldn't think twice about throwing money away on an Edition. Hell, you could wipe your butt with 100 dollars bills just for the hell of it. It aint hard to understand! GOD!

The point is that at some point excess has got to be morally wrong. If you make a million dollars a day and then buy million dollar underwear, then you are doing something wrong. The 'it's your money you can do whatever you want with it' only goes so far. If you're wasting huge sums of money just because you can, you're a bad person. Isn't this common sense?

You called people making the watches peasants/serfs (a poor farmer of low status renting small piece of land for subsistence farming) or in informal usage (someone ignorant, rude and unsophisticated of low social status). Those that work in the factories come from the countryside and make probably 20 times the money they could make there. It is a major upgrade in both economics, status and the potential for something better.

Your whole spiel is reprehensible and haughty. Being moral means looking inward as much as judging others; that's were the work starts first.

Even in a more equal world, say some western socialist democracies like in Scandinavia, there are still people "more equal" than others. Should they also feel bad about spending their money if their already surrender 65% away in taxes?

There a few moral absolutes, usually called human rights. Beyond that there is no consensus and there may never be. We can just try to be the best person ourselves and help those around us. That's less haughty and much more constructive.

----------

Oh please do not try and compare a computer with a wrist strap to a mechanical watch. It's chalk and cheese. Ones made by a robot in a factory (which part is hand assembled? Attaching the strap doesn't count), one is meticulously assembled, hundreds if not thousands of parts, all set in place by one man. Clicking a few wires into place which only go in one way does not require the precision of a mechanical watch.

Really, are they machining each parts by hand? No. It's assembly and with time, anyone can do it it. There's nothing magic about it.

Pieces of metal kit jigged together have no more standing, or prestige or whatever than the modern equivalent. If a Chinese workmen in Shanghai does it for 1/20 the price, it has no less value than if a very expensive swiss guy does it. They'll be useless pieces of crap either way. And while a few watch mechanisms could be construed as art, most aren't.

BTW, In a few years (very soon), EVERYTHING will be printed/assembled by robots, even your precious mechanical "marvels" will churned by the truckload to whoever still wants them.
 
BTW, In a few years (very soon), EVERYTHING will be printed/assembled by robots, even your precious mechanical "marvels" will churned by the truckload to whoever still wants them.

Mechanical watches have been made by hand for hundreds of years. Even during the Quartz revolution, mechanical watches were still made by hand. Considering luxury mechanical watches are still popular, they will be made my hand.

----------

While a lot of us had hoped that Apple would use that less expensive gold (so that more people could afford an Edition), in the end it turned out that they used normal gold.

So that article does not apply.

Alternatively, apple did use less expensive gold and kept the same ridiculous price so they could make even more profit.
 
Even if someone gave me this watch for free I would never wear it. It's gaudy, like driving a Bentley.
 
...Really, are they machining each parts by hand? No. It's assembly and with time, anyone can do it it. There's nothing magic about it...

Mechanical (Swiss) watches have been assembled by hand. And yes, some parts are made, finished by hand even nowdays. In order to work in a Swiss watch factory, you have to finish a special school. And it takes years while you are allowed to assemble on your own. It is not magic, just an ability to make masterpieces and not gadgets.
 
Right, a Rolex does cost a huge amount but at least they are examples of excellent craftsmanship. The Edition is a made in china mass produced watch with a gold shell. LOL

Sorry, but isn't it a little racist to say something assembled by hand in limited quantities in China is crap but one made in Switzerland by caucasians is high luxury? I've heard via several media sources that one of the reasons companies don't manufacture electronics here is because there's so few Americans with the skill to do it.
 
Would be interesting to know why these ship later than the regular Apple watches. If obviously only the materials differ Apple seemed to have aimed for the highest quality standards.
 
Wow, no deliveries until now? (unless you got handouts or bought them at a boutique)

With the amount of profit per watch involved, I would have made sure those were flying out to customers first thing.

To be able to spend the price of a car on a watch that will be obsolete in 5 years....that's another world.

Much too generous one year would be spot on:rolleyes:
 
People still defending the mechanical watches over a smart watch.

digital watches are far more accurate, far more reliable, far more capable, and far less expensive.

To each his own i guess.
 
People still defending the mechanical watches over a smart watch.

digital watches are far more accurate, far more reliable, far more capable, and far less expensive.

To each his own i guess.

Accurate? Maybe
Reliable? Only when charged
Capable? Definitely
Less expensive? Not really. I looked at a Rolex the other day that was $17k. How's that different than the Edition?
 
Oh please do not try and compare a computer with a wrist strap to a mechanical watch. It's chalk and cheese. Ones made by a robot in a factory (which part is hand assembled? Attaching the strap doesn't count), one is meticulously assembled, hundreds if not thousands of parts, all set in place by one man. Clicking a few wires into place which only go in one way does not require the precision of a mechanical watch.

But which is the more accurate timepiece? mechanical watches are incapable of anything like the accuracy of a quartz watch let alone the precision time keeping of an apple watch, even my $100 Seiko solar keeps time to within 2-3 seconds per month, no mechanical watch comes close and let's be honest at the end of the day accuracy is the prime determinant of the quality of a timepiece.
 
Even if someone gave me this watch for free I would never wear it. It's gaudy, like driving a Bentley.

I'm hoping you are talking about luxury dumb watches because the Watch is the epitome of understated elegance. There isn't even an Apple logo visible on it, unlike the gaudy luxury watches that scream ROLEX!!!!!!!!!!
 
1: An Apple watch won't last 5-10 years because a) battery will be dead (okay you can replace that, but apple will eventually stop making the batteries for it) and b) in 5-10 years time it will be unsupported on whatever iOS is current at that time. iPhone 4 is not even 5 years old yet didn't get iOS 8. So in 5 years time, Apple Watch probably won't be supported due to software.

At least with a rolex, the $600 every 5-10 years is a hell of a lot cheaper than $15k every 5-10 years for a new Apple Watch.

2: You can get a gold rolex for under $15k. The models that are >$30K have the gold bracelet as well, which the Apple watch does not have.

3: Do you honestly believe that's what Apple pays that much for the gold? They'll have a contract with a supplier to provide x amount, and the ounce price will be cheaper than that.

4: A made in china, factory produced computer with a strap is not a luxury item. A hand assembled Swiss watch, assembled by one single person is a luxury item.

A gold apple watch will cost a hell of a lot less to manufacture than a Rolex. Labour cost alone will be a fraction because it's made in a factory in china by people earning $1 a day.

Someone that knows there stuff im so glad I did not have to write all that lol. As he said I would not Call Apples gold watch a luxury watch. Rolexs each take a year to make. You can watch all documentary on it. And yes you can get a Rolex with gold in it under 17k , stainless steel ones are 8k themselfs and they use 904l steel I think it is. I like apple a lot but Im not going to defend them on there none luxury gold watch
 
Accurate? Maybe
Reliable? Only when charged
Capable? Definitely
Less expensive? Not really. I looked at a Rolex the other day that was $17k. How's that different than the Edition?

accurate? without question, mechanical watches are very innaccurate when compared to atomically synced or quartz movements. not even debatable. the clock on your phone has more accuracy and precision than a mechanical watch of any brand.

reliability is in reference to parts. the intricacies of a mechanical movement are far more susceptible to failure.

expensive? digital watches are cheaper to manufacture, therefore pricing can fall below the average "luxury" mechanical movement.

honestly, the only reasons i can think of to legitimately buy a mechanical piece is a) you like the history and craftsmenship b) you like the brand c) you like the status of owning one.
 
Accurate? Maybe
Reliable? Only when charged
Capable? Definitely
Less expensive? Not really. I looked at a Rolex the other day that was $17k. How's that different than the Edition?

Rolex: tells time (may or may not be accurate depending on how well the watch has been maintained and whether it has been wound, even auto-winding watches need to be worn to be wound so sitting in a drawer won't cut it), maybe tells the date. Some people think it makes you look wealthy, some people think it makes you look like a douche or an old man.

Watch: tells time (yes, perfectly accurately because the time is based on the standard atomic clock time), date, make calls, text, listen to music...... you get my point. Some people think it's a cool piece of tech, some people think it's a waste of money or hate you because you are an Apple fan

Look, I get the perceived glamour of the luxury watches. They are well made and have a mystique some people appreciate. Personally, I think most of them are ugly gaudy and scream LOOK AT ME, I HAVE MONEY AND NEED YOU TO KNOW IT. I paid a lot for my cuckoo clock from Germany because it has the mystique of being from Germany, home of the cuckoo clock. Doesn't mean it's my best source for time telling. It's a souvenir. It has special value amongst the people who also appreciate it. Other people couldn't care less about it.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but isn't it a little racist to say something assembled by hand in limited quantities in China is crap but one made in Switzerland by caucasians is high luxury? I've heard via several media sources that one of the reasons companies don't manufacture electronics here is because there's so few Americans with the skill to do it.


Lmao racist , China is known for the biggest counterfeit of goods. China does not have a good reputation and are affiliated with cheap products . That's why Apple doesn't put made in China on there products. Wonder why they put designed in California on there products ? It's much more appealing then seeing made in China. They put assembled in China designed in California. the only companie I know that does that. Companies don't manufacture here because they can pay people in China penny's on the dollar compared to here. Get your facts straight. Then you have huge tax rate here for business.

Rolexs hold there value.
 
What difference does that make? They're still all hand assembled unlike an Apple Watch which is just a computer. There's no craftsmanship in an Apple watch.

So the mass produced thing no longer applies.

Well, you know that Rolexes are completely CATIA-CNC machined don't you? It's just the movement that's hand-assembled because it's much simpler that way.

So, we have that:

1- Rolexes are mass produced.
2- Rolexes are created purely by machines, and assembled by humans (like iphones, but the assembly is more complicated)

Then there's the country thing. Do you know that Prada builds in China?

The problem you have is you are biased and you consider Rolex top-end hand made. And they're not, they are just high quality products. The fact is people don't know the real high end watches brands, and that's why rolex is often criticised, because its intensive marketing face (Oh... doesn't that sound familiar to you? High quality+a lot of "marketing" critics??)
 
This is what people fail to understand. Some of the people who can afford this gold watch lose more in Vegas.

You're absolutely correct.

Gold Apple Watch is nothing more than just another novelty to those with millions. Doubt that? Simply Google millionaires. There are far more people in this group than many on this forum realize. Nor do they care about how long it will remain current.

In a month after they've recieved it, the newness is gone, it's been tossed in a drawer and the owner has gone back to wearing his / her favorite AP, MOINET, Chopard, Patek Philippe, et al... all well known, highly recognized and much sought after_true_ luxury timepieces. Each of which has a legendary history that Apple can't buy for their rather plain copy of Tank Watch style.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.