Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but I agree with you (assuming you aren’t).
Throttling saved millions of users from random shutdowns, but the OS not disclosing it to users cost the company dearly in terms of goodwill.
The strong prevalence of such cynical theories are exactly why transparency and communication is key. All the moreso for Apple these days.
Apple saved millions of users from random shutdown? Shutdowns on iPhone 7s or iPhone 6s, which are just over a year old? How nice of them. But since you are obviously avoiding some arguments in this discussions because it would deflect from your self painted Good-Guys-Apple World too much and are trying overly hard to be obtuse, I repost again the following, since you avoided/ignored it the last time:
I come back to the what is done is done part: Apple has been designing and engineering mobile devices for decades now. Lithium battery technology has a few years under is belt, too. One has to assume gross incompetence (if not malicious intent) on Apple's side to design a device that throttling would be required only after months or just over a year of usage. Battery quality (density, capacity, degradation) are pretty much know factors. Apple is not new to this game.
But still, giving the benefit of a doubt: now to assume more incompetence or oversight when Apple's engineering department implementing a hot fix, realising that the batteries are degrading quicker than anyone thought without informing the Geniuses for a long period (someone mentioned over a year), is not exactly painting a confidence inspiring light on Apple.