At this rate, all those promised AI features won't arrive until iOS 19.4.
That's pretty much what Mark Gurman said.At this rate, all those promised AI features won't arrive until iOS 19.4.
It will be the conversational SIri (19.4) that in the end decides if Apple’s lateness is justified. I’m sure it will be debated more than else in years.Apple fans don’t care. The vocal minority make it seem like the masses are ready to jump ship, but it’s not the case.
Anything he's "accomplished" in a decade and a half has been half-baked compared to Apple's competitors. Dude needs to grow a pair and push Apple to innovate
I don’t think the transition from Intel to AS Macs can be nothing accomplished. Yes Siri is got a more then year to go, but using hardware as example we can truly celebrate. Then you have evolution of the iPhone and iPads. OS’s we can be more critical of course as we all have criticism about that.I don't even know why Tim runs Apple anymore... Anything he's "accomplished" in a decade and a half has been half-baked compared to Apple's competitors.
Samsung's tablets have 25 hours of battery life too. If one looks at the AI features of a Samsung PC/phone, it is indeed more powerful than what Apple just released. Most impressively, is the live translate feature.I don’t think the transition from Intel to AS Macs can be nothing accomplished. Yes Siri is got a more then year to go, but using hardware as example we can truly celebrate. Then you have evolution of the iPhone and iPads. OS’s we can be more critical of course as we all have criticism about that.![]()
Let's be honest. I'm in the market for a new laptop. Apple offers nothing I want at this point.A word that has long lost meaning, among the gnattering masses of internet self-declaring experts.
All valid points, still like full size PCs for gaming over the noisier gaming laptops, but energy efficiency I diffidently seen lower power bills with the AS Mac’s. It’s always your call what you need and use. Siri is something should have been improved couple years ago, instead of playing min Ram games with iPhones and iPads.Let's be honest. I'm in the market for a new laptop. Apple offers nothing I want at this point.
Do I want AI and an OLED screen? Go with Samsung.
Touch screen? Basically any other brand at this point but Apple.
Gaming? MSI, Alienware, or ASUS
Battery life? A few companies offer 24 hours of battery life on a laptop.
Other laptops also have a Face ID alternative. Not sure why Apple hasn't done that yet.
Apple might've been ahead of the game for about a year... But has since fallen behind yet again in the PC area.
He posted another article todayThis seems to be a rather scathing indictment of Siri. Siri works fine for me for simple tasks. More complex things seems to give her a bit of trouble at times:
![]()
Siri Is Super Dumb and Getting Dumber
Siri with Apple Intelligence gives confident but embarrasingly wrong answers to sports trivia questions, both famous (Super Bowls) and obscure (North Dakota high school hoops).daringfireball.net
"My sense is that it’s less about Siri and Apple Intelligence being more important than VisionOS, and more about Siri being a mess. More about urgency than importance. But perhaps it’s both more urgent and more important long-term. Either way, assigning Vorrath — perhaps Apple’s best fixer, and without question one of Apple’s best fixers — makes sense. As my piece yesterday illustrated, something is rotten in the state of SiriLand.The move signals that AI is now more important than the Vision Pro, which launched in February 2024, and is seen as the biggest challenge within the company, according to a longtime Apple executive who asked not to be identified. Vorrath has a knack for organizing engineering groups and creating an effective workflow with new processes, the executive said.
As a proud and happy owner of Apple Vision Pro it’s frustrating that the leader in charge of that product is being pulled away. You would think there would be somebody else who can get the Apple Intelligence and Siri program fixed other than her.
Even if you’re not using Apple Vision Pro now, if Apple continues to approve the product and its ecosystem, everybody will be using version 2.0 or 3.0 in about five years.
AI being more important strategically for Apple's future does not mean Apple won't update or will discontinue Vision Pro.They wouldn't remove the leader from that team if they believed it had a strong future.
Yeah, I'm not sure how much AI goes into a "self-driving" car outside of its navigation software, which is a pretty specific task compared to being a general-purpose AI assistant. Sounds like a lot of those developers had to get up to speed on AI. Are there, or were there at the time, so few good developers in AI that Apple felt compelled to redeploy their existing ones who might have known little or nothing about AI, to work on AI? Was it because they were already acclimated to the Apple culture?Maybe Apple shouldn't have transfered the employees who worked on Apple's failed Car project to work on Apple Intelligence.
You're right. Apple only has one set of developers working on only one project at any given timeAnd it comes at the cost of development of another product....
Gemini and ChatGPT are wrong all the time for me. It’s really quite surprising just how often wrong answers occur. I was a late adopter when it came to this technology and I thought lots of the downsides would have been ironed out by the time I started using it. I’ve been continuously surprised how wrong I was.No one can “fix” generative AI. It is a “yes, and” technology. It just spits out results, and no one should trust they aren’t hallucinations.
This entire field is a dead end and every continued training round (which costs exponentially more) gives diminishing returns.
If you want to automate emails, fine, but this should technology should NEVER be used in any type of critical systems or workflows without a large team of humans to check its work.
None of this is worth the money, ecological resources, or focus the Tech industry and governments have poured into it.
Remember when people said just wait, they’ll do it the Apple way and do it better than everyone else?Apple's slower, methodical approach to product evolution hasn't been compatible with the fast-moving pace of AI.