Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What a mess...
Chat GPT is so advanced.

I'm testing Gemini Advanced these days (I have it at part of the business standard subscription) and it's not as reliable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mescagnus
So, what are your thoughts on the $500 billion Project Stargate initiative announced by Trump, Ellison, Altman?
Might as well light that money on fire. Or you can listen to Ellison himself when he stated that citizens will behave better when surveilled. Oracle is basically the backbone of CIA technical capabilities already…


I think these data centers going up are actually going to wind up being used for surveillance when everything is said and done 🤷‍♂️


Anyway, back on topic regarding Apple. I think they’re smart in how they’ve approaching AI from a business sense. It’s not a viable business model, but instead the *personal context* of Apple Intelligence makes for a great product *feature*.
 
The complaints around Siri have been there for years. Siri is 14 years now and can’t live up to the Apple commercials from 14 years ago. It’s a total embarrassment not only for the head of software engineering but especially for the ceo. It shows the ceo has no clue about what’s relevant for future products.

HomePod, iPhone, command center, HomeKit, maps… all the key elements are useless without a good assistant.

Total embarrassment and disastrous for future developments.
It’s embarrassing but the fact stands that the leadership doesn’t care. Worse, this new exec is not going to fix the problem because the whole culture is rotten to its Apple core.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy and HJM.NL


Apple is making an internal staffing change that it hopes will improve Siri and its artificial intelligence offerings, reports Bloomberg. Kim Vorrath, a 37-year Apple veteran, will join the AI team to work under AI chief John Giannandrea.

Apple-Intelligence-General-Feature.jpg

Vorrath is a program management VP, and has a reputation for meticulously managing software projects at Apple and ensuring employees meet deadlines. She has been described as Apple's "bug wrangler" and as a "powerful force" in the company. For the last few years, she has been working on Apple's AR/VR team developing the Vision Pro headset, but now she is being moved to AI.

The news comes just after a widely circulated story about Siri's failure to accurately provide basic knowledge about Super Bowl results. Siri has long been seen as inferior to other personal assistants, and in recent years, Siri has been unable to measure up to AI-based chatbots.

Apple is also addressing widespread criticism of its Apple Intelligence Notification summary feature, which has on several occasions mistakenly summarized news stories in a way that produced confusing false headlines. To fix the problem, Apple is temporarily removing Notification summaries for news and entertainment apps in iOS 18.3, an update expected next week.

Apple attempted to improve Siri by integrating OpenAI's ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence, but there are still serious problems with Siri. Additional Siri features are going to be coming in the near future as part of an iOS 18.4 update, and in iOS 19, Apple is rumored to be planning to introduce an LLM version of Siri that will be comparable to ChatGPT and Google's Gemini.

According to Bloomberg, Vorrath's move to the AI team is a signal that the company sees AI as more important than the Vision Pro. Vorrath is known for organizing engineering groups and redesigning workflows with new processes.

In a memo announcing the change, Giannandrea said that Apple plans to focus on improving the Siri infrastructure as well as Apple's in-house AI models.

Article Link: Apple Brings in New Exec to 'Fix' Siri and Apple Intelligence
Bruh!!!!

Seriosuly?! Seriously!!!

John Giannandrea specifically hired to boost Siri and A.i work at Apple over 6yrs ago!

Less than 12mths boosted to executive role and gets stock options yet ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to show for it in that time!

3yrs and Siri gets a few softwr voice tweaks which hardly ANY user can tell, new HomePod mini's with tweaks to sending home messages to other pod minis which has NOTHING to do with John btw another team did that, and a few more langauges supported!

Now you need to hire another person reporting to John Giannandrea to fix Siri?!

Siri is NOT thr problem here its your Google trojan horse John Giannandrea! Hint: what happened to Nokia's mobile division when a Microsoft exec was hired to lead as CEO?! Can anyone guess or better yet use gOogle Gemini to find the amswer vs gOogle search!

Craig supposedly brought A.i. to teams at Apple since they missed the boat! Why where they late with an A.i. experience person on the team?!

Exactly!

Scott Forstall was booted for not apologizing for Maps - data points where 3rd parry and NOT his fault!

So WHOM should be fired or forced for a major public apology NOW regarding Siri's delayed and missed A.i. while everyone in competition developed their own solution while Apple became THE last partner for OpenAI - yet another reliance on Microsoft!! We thought this was done long ago!

So yeah whom should be forced to apologize or get booted now ...Seriously!!?? Seriosuly!
 

Attachments

  • F_Seriously.GIF
    F_Seriously.GIF
    337.5 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:
Fascinating that Apple would spend years, billions and their best engineers on pointless (Apple car) and semi-pointless (Vision pro) ventures and yet couldn' find it in them to fix a major feature of their main cash cow and emblematic product.

Better (very) late than never i guess.
 
I found the way I used Siri had an impact on how effective Siri is. Not saying Siri does not need significant upgrades. First change waiting a couple seconds after saying Siri. Depending upon variables like networks and devices, portions of the request get lost if spoken to fast. As such, in complete or nonexistent answers. The way that works best for me to Siri, use the Apple Watch Crown. The screen will show when Siri is ready, no need to use Siri word, and the results are significantly better. The above for Apple. Make Siri respond to a request. Example, Siri, response “yes” give command.
Indeed. I messed around with Super Bowl winners today in order to see how bad it was for myself, and I found that the quality of the results depended upon how I asked the questions. Siri scored 100% in my admittedly small sampling if the questions were unambiguous and didn’t use Roman numerals (in cases where I typed the question).

But people will understandably expect Siri to just work, and won’t want to think about how to phrase questions.
 
First order of business for the new exec: get rid of the "Here is what I found on the web for you" response.
I actually don't mind that as much as Siri defaulting to "if I don't understand the request, it's probably a kind of music they want, so I'll cheerfully announce that I'm playing some polkas chosen specially for you".
 
I still stand with my conspiracy theory that they bought Siri, the whole team left since and they don't have the right (skilled) people to actually develop in further. Might go as far as not understanding it's core because it was initially developed by a whole different group of people.
 
Fascinating that Apple would spend years, billions and their best engineers on pointless (Apple car) and semi-pointless (Vision pro) ventures and yet couldn' find it in them to fix a major feature of their main cash cow and emblematic product.

Better (very) late than never i guess.

The problem is that they make no money from Siri or AI
And with how bad they both are, there is no path to charging anyone for either anytime soon (if ever)
 
The problem is that they make no money from Siri or AI
And with how bad they both are, there is no path to charging anyone for either anytime soon (if ever)

Do they make money from reminders or notes ? it's supposed to be a core feature.
And they wasted how much on Apple car?
 
Do they make money from reminders or notes ? it's supposed to be a core feature.
And they wasted how much on Apple car?

They don't, no
Reminders and Notes are orders of magnitude simpler in terms of the problem though

I'm not defending Apple at all -- I think they'd like to fix Siri but have simply been unable to.
One wonders how financially committed they are to making it better though (seems like not too much)

I agree with you -- they've wasted billions on VR goggles and the Car and many other things
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSL1
Random engineer: we must focused on future products like AI and innovative technology.
Tim Cook: no, let's spend lots of resources in cinema productions and TV shows... and why not, let's create a brand new Apple soda. People are gonna love it
 
  • Haha
Reactions: smulji
Random engineer: we must focused on future products like AI and innovative technology.
Tim Cook: no, let's spend lots of resources in cinema productions and TV shows... and why not, let's create a brand new Apple soda. People are gonna love it
Well, I actually like their shows (even if nobody watches them). But still , not a reason for letting Siri rot.
 
They need to in all honesty. I was trying to listen to that new Sexxy Red and Bruno Mars song “Fat Juicy & Wet” and it started playing Nelly’s “Hot in Here.” Terrible for a speaker that exclusively relies on Siri for commands.
 
But people will understandably expect Siri to just work, and won’t want to think about how to phrase questions.
I think a big part of the problem is that Apple promoted Siri as being able to understand any natural language question when the tubes and wires behind the facade were absolutely not capable of anything remotely like understanding natural language questions, and Apple just ran with the "fake it until you make it" strategy. So they didn't establish specific syntax / grammar, and you can't go check detailed documentation of how to format a particular request so that Siri will understand (they have lists of examples of things you could ask, but they're just "giving ideas", and not exhaustive).

Recent example that sticks in my head:
  • "Hey Siri, remind me in one hour to pick out a shirt for tomorrow"
  • "Okay, I'll remind you at 1am tomorrow to pick out a shirt"
A four year old could handle that request better than Siri did, and the request is not at all unclear. But any time Siri sees something it can parse as time-related (like "tomorrow") it excitedly strips that off of the request and tries to use for scheduling. I recently tried "Hey Siri, remind me in the morning that I took Tylenol at 2am" and got "I can't schedule reminders in the past" - uh, sure, but I did not ask you to. If Siri's syntax was "remind me at (time) that (any arbitrary string of words)", then that would have worked fine. I ended up working around this with "remind me in the morning I took Tylenol two A" - which is a mediocre workaround, having to disguise any mention of times to keep Siri from stealing it.

It's like some rom-com plot device where a person gets hired as the personal assistant of some executive they have a crush on, but fakes knowing the language in order to get hired, and then awkward hilarity ensues when they constantly misunderstand basic requests. In the real world, though, that would just get you fired.

And then, on the opposite side, I randomly asked Siri "what shape is an Erlenmeyer flask" (because I was trying to see if I was remembering the right name), and Siri correctly replied "according to Wikipedia, it's cone." It's just really hard to know what Siri can parse and what it can't, leading to people wasting time asking all sorts of questions / making requests Siri has no chance of answering correctly

I would have much preferred it if Apple had released Siri with "Siri can understand these two dozen spoken commands in these specific formats", and then progressively expanded upon the vocabulary over the years until they reached the point where Siri could understand most natural language.
 
Is Apple blaming the failings of Siri and Apple Intelligence on not being able to meet deadlines? Maybe they should try finding better software developers and not a new manager.

I wouldn't blame the software developers. The problems most complained about by Siri critics lay in the areas of product marketing and product management, that is, with the people who determine what the market wants and what the product should be. The fact that they are making a switch in program management tells you that Apple sees problems in either meeting timelines, managing budgets, alignment/communication between stakeholders, or cross functional coordination. Fixing problems in those areas will not address fundamental issues in product definition, vision, priorities, or roadmap.
 
I wish we could have device specific name options for Siri

As it is now, I have "hey siri" off on anything other than my phone because it was always randomly deciding which device to actually reply to my request on (and it was very often not the one I wanted, was using or that which was physically closest to me)

Given that

I'd prefer to be able to say "Hey Pad" for my iPad and "Hey Phone" for my iPhone and "Hey Mac" for my Mac Mini
(just examples)
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.