In regards to the whole lawsuit in general, I think that the biggest place that apple has to look at is in advertising. That screen shot of the Galaxy S app list compared to an iPhone home screen does make it seem like an iPhone (I think that wasn't samsungs smartest move, gives more power to the competitor), BUT as soon as you get past those screens they're VERY different phones.
You know, the galaxy S2 actually IS a bit of a threat to the iPhone market, not saying it'd topple it, just saying that the release time, coupled with excellent phone features and Android's UI, which some people may prefer believe it or not, will lead to many people on expiring iPhone contracts to adopt this phone here and now, on top of that, the iPhone 5 or 4S or whatever will have to be AMAZING (not apple amazing, actual amazing) to even begin to take back the market share. What ever comes out second has to be far better than what came out first. For this years round of phones, the Galaxy S2 is the heavyweight (HTC Sensation is meh and let's say that while the Atrix is nice, it's not as nice as the S2 and not worth all the radiation you'd absorb from using the thing).
As for the guy going on about malware? EVERY device that can run a program can run a virus, or malware, It takes users to screw it up the most these days, and while it's true that an open platform increases the risk, the shear popularity of the iPhone, coupled with users beliefs that it's impervious to viruses, and apple unwillingness to EVER admit that their platforms are susceptible to attack makes for a good target. (
http://gizmodo.com/5325703/iphone-s...llow-every-iphone-in-the-world-to-be-hijacked). This flaw later showed up on other platforms, but apple did nothing for a month, good thing these guys didn't release the code to anyone!
