Just remember that reliable is best defined as being better than the average driver. The better will increase over time but even starting at better is a net improvement over the current paradigm.Self driving cars on normal crazy city streets are 8-10 years away, min.
/edit. RELIABLE self driving cars I mean. I get Tesla has it's unsafe beta already. (And normal autopilot on highways is pretty good actually)
Or the entire project is just a big dumpster fire. Apple can't do everything, making a car is much more complex than what it seems.SMH! What a disaster. Every week we're getting news like this. This, Apple car project may not be exciting to work with anymore.
You are actually right. Tesla is just one company doing this. Their tech advancement is based on the miles driven by the cars they have sold.Self driving cars on normal crazy city streets are 8-10 years away, min.
/edit. RELIABLE self driving cars I mean. I get Tesla has it's unsafe beta already. (And normal autopilot on highways is pretty good actually)
While the pun isn't lost on me, I do wonder just how well these folks are paid. It can be relatively well. If nothing else, they're getting good $$, but they want to leave b/c of creative differences, time requirements, stress, etc. Hell, Apple ofc. isn't the only big tech company to lose good talent, despite paying these folks well, with other amenities to boot.Turns out he was after Moore money…
I’d like to double my salary every 18 monthsTurns out he was after Moore money…
Projects like this are usually a perpetual "decade away". Take fusion power as an example.It will be released in current year + 5 = never.
Although greatly disappointed, I would not be surprised if you are correct. I'm saddened by the laziness of our GoPuff convenience culture, so that kids will change jobs just to remain in sweatpants. Similarly, this culture has driven the explosion of Amazon, so rather than physically shop, purchases are soon dropped at your door at the mere expenses seas of vacant retail space and our residential streets choked with constantly circulating blue vans. And brown ones. And white ones.I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a dumpster fire. I’ve seen those at corporations multiple times. That said let’s just say (without disclosing sources) that the recent spate of departures is not going unnoticed by other employees and much of it seems to be firmly linked to an arbitrary “must work in office so many days a week” rule that Apple senior management seems desperate to impose. Even new requisitions are putting these requirements in the hiring documents and that’s making it harder for Apple to find new talent than would otherwise be the case.
If they change their stance on this it will likely slow the bleeding currently experienced.
Although greatly disappointed, I would not be surprised if you are correct. I'm saddened by the laziness of our GoPuff convenience culture, so that kids will change jobs just to remain in sweatpants. Similarly, this culture has driven the explosion of Amazon, so rather than physically shop, purchases are soon dropped at your door at the mere expenses seas of vacant retail space and our residential streets choked with constantly circulating blue vans. And brown ones. And white ones.
7 years Tesla but only 9 months at Apple?
Possibilities:
1. Got a better offer and sequentially job hopped.
2. Didn’t fit in with the team.
2a. Pushed for/against something and lost.
2b. Saw Apple not on the right course to deliver a project.
Turnover in an organization is normal but at such a level, such a short tenure raises questions with vetting, compensation, commitments and perspective that’s only seen once on the inside.
I wonder the same. All I can think is they are jumping ship because they want to make something happen, and it’s not what they thought they would be doing at aapl.. being creative and releasing something tangible.I don't understand how this keeps happening. You would think that Apple is in the absolute perfect position to attract and retain the most incredible talent. They can pay high salaries, provide attractive stock option grants, allocate huge budgets and freedom to projects. How do they fail to create a compelling overall package (not just financially) that makes people stay?