And?.. Get help yourself in being more clear on what you are trying to convey.
I really hate doing long posts, but maybe you need extra help on this one.
consumable:
adjective
1.
able or meant to be
consumed, as by eating, drinking, or using:
consumable goods.
2.
liable to be used up or depleted:
comsumable resources.
noun
3.
Usually, consumables. something that is produced to be
consumed, as processed food or fuel.
Starbucks drink = consumable, iTunes music media = non-consumable.
I could be totally wrong, but I never heard of renting Starbuck. I really don't want to picture how anyone would return the rented coffee.
There is no alternative if you want Starbucks, beside purchasing another brand, or not getting it. You buy it, then use it in that moment.
A better argument against Starbucks would be skipping the coffee, and investing the money that is spent. I would agree with you if you said this, although it probably would be really off topic for this thread.
If you normally get a Starbuck once a day @ about $5, then decided to invest the Starbucks money instead of buying a consumable, some would be surprised at how much money they could be wasting.
Use an ETF at the 10 year average rate for ten year, and you could make over $26k, that is on top of the $18k from the money you spent. This is also assuming it is a no load fund and not taken in account taxes, but I think people will get the point.
I have digressed from the topic, but that would be a lot better argument against Starbucks than your statement.
It's like saying: After 10 years of paying for coffee at Starbucks, you would have spent crap loads of money, what will you have to show for it?
Now, back on topic, a better example would have been renting/leasing a car or a house.
You have a choice in buying a song, or renting it using AM. Just like a car or house.
When you subscription is up on AM, you no longer can use the song. Just like a car or house.
If you opt to buy the song, you can use it as much as you want, for as long as you want. Just like a car or house.
Please, follow the thread, and look at the posts that I mention AM:
It is great that it works for you
if this option works for you, then that is great.
That is nice that it works out for you.
I said repeatedly, that it is great that AM works for you
I am not knocking people that use AM,
AM is good for the people that like it
I am not saying AM is a horrible service that no one should use. I am responding to the post that basically says if you don't use AM you must be cheap or poor.
I was giving reasons why someone would prefer not to use AM.