exactly, super fast, and we are on the 18th iOS.10 years?? How time flies.
And, India still doesn't have Apple Pay.
exactly, super fast, and we are on the 18th iOS.10 years?? How time flies.
Some online stores have implemented Apple pay during checkout. You can pay with any card in your wallet, your information is automatically populated during checkout and tracking can be viewed through both, the vendor site and through Apple’s wallet.I don’t understand. Do you mean Apple Card?
How are returns or tracking enhanced by paying with Apple Pay if, say, the credit card stored for my Apple Pay is a bog standard Chase card?
How does the payment system enhance the seller’s logistics (tracking)?
If I return an item it’s up to the seller to return the payment, or the card bank to credit the amount - how does Apple (the NFC chip provider) improve returns?
I am curious because I wonder if I am missing out on features, or if these are Apple Card benefits.
We don't have the big box stores where I am. I'm just glad that all my local stores take AP. I'm waiting for the street people to start using card readers.It only started being useful recently.
Kroger and Lowes finally gave up and started taking it.
A lot of it boils down to one word - leverage.Can someone explain to me why is Apple Pay some sort of a special service? Why couldn't any one else do it? I mean paypal has been there for ages before it and it basically worked like Apple Pay. Apple Pay's advantage was its touch/Face-ID authentication since they own the hardware+software which Paypal and other services could not replicate.
The only thing “special” about it is this deep integration with Apple hardware and Safari. It’s just a whole lot faster to use than a 3rd party app.Can someone explain to me why is Apple Pay some sort of a special service? Why couldn't any one else do it? I mean paypal has been there for ages before it and it basically worked like Apple Pay. Apple Pay's advantage was its touch/Face-ID authentication since they own the hardware+software which Paypal and other services could not replicate.
You have got to remember when using the US as a basis for this opinion, that the US lags behind most of the western world for payments and electronic bank transactions in general.Yet more undeserved praise for Tim Cook's mediocrity. Apple Pay is an inferior technology to mainland China's WeChat Pay, which was released over one year earlier than Apple Pay. (Apple Pay was released in October 2014, and WeChat Pay was released in August 2013.) Apple Pay initially required an NFC machine for the seller, but now the seller can also use just another Apple device. WeChat Pay requires the seller only to have a piece of paper with a QR code printed on it. No wonder practically every seller in mainland China—even poor people from the remote countryside who sell fruits out of old wooden pushcarts on the side of the road—accept WeChat Pay. But here in the U.S., there are still many brick-and-mortar stores that don't accept Apple Pay.
I'm fully aware of the WeChat app's shortcomings (such as lack of privacy). But I'm not talking about the entire WeChat app. I'm only talking about the WeChat Pay function, and saying that Apple Pay is a much inferior technology in comparison. Apple Pay's requirement for sellers to have expensive technological equipment prohibits it from becoming ubiquitous. A printed piece of paper with a QR code on it that costs only a couple of cents to print at a print shop is why WeChat Pay is practically accepted everywhere in mainland China, and precisely why mainland China was the first and practically only cashless society in the world. I'm not talking at all about politics here. I'm only talking about payment methods.
Tim Cook is mediocre, and that's why Apple Pay is not like WeChat Pay. Cook deserves no praise for Apple Pay. Although Apple Pay is better than using cash or phisical credit and debit cards, Apple Pay is not ubiquitous, and thus people in the U.S. still need to carry cash and physical credit and debit cards with them. In mainland China, it's commonplace for people to practically never need to use cash nor physical credit and debit cards. That's the case in mainland China practically everywhere from the most advanced and modern wealthy big cities like Shanghai to the most backwards and poor remote countryside areas. It shows how Cook is not a products person.
For enough, the integration of Touch / FaceID and the credit cards stored on the phone is very convenient, but that applies to virtually every phone in the world now, doesn't it? And if people opt for cheaper phones that still use PIN's, what's it got to do with the cards stored on the phone?With Apple Pay, Apple once again utilises their control over hardware and software to great effect, from the software UX underpinning Apple Pay, to Touch / Face ID to secure enclave to having a billion credit cards stored in iTunes ready to be added to Apple Pay to integrating it with your iPhone and Apple Watch. It doesn't matter how good a service like PayPal is when it's simply an app on your phone that much be launched manually, vs say, launching Apple Pay on your watch to pay for a train ride or a meal at a cafe.
This is where you lose me. What do you mean "a bank that supports Apple Pay"? If the shop has an NFC terminal it accepts contactless payments from any credit card that the seller accepts (MasterCard, Visa, Amex, etc.); what do the banks have to do with this, they are just a distributor. Banks cannot dictate which shops can accept the cards that they distribute, can they - that would be ludicrous.Banks are like carriers. Just as consumers were (at one point) willing to switch carriers just to use the iPhone, so too were users willing to switch to a bank that supported Apple Pay. Or at least, the idea is that banks fear this inevitability enough to hop on board and support Apple Pay.
Yes, but at least Wal-Mart does provide a way to pay with your phone using any credit card through their app, albeit with the data collection caveats. Home Depot on the other hand provides no way to do any kind of mobile payment. Every time I go to the register there I have a ‘Doh!’ moment and have to run out to my car to grab a card.They don’t have to accept credit cards. That is fully their call. I don’t think any corporation enjoys transaction fees they can’t control. It is why so many joined MCX.
IMO that argument (from their CEO) does not justify them not accepting Apple Pay as their fees are generally lower.
They also insist on their payment method (Wal*Mart Pay) for the same reasons they liked MCX, they want to collect data on their consumers.
Maybe you're thinking of Apple Card. Apply Pay has been here for a long time.10 years later and still no Apple Pay in Canada just a maybe next year.
It wasn't that straightforward for me. Apple Pay was announced in 2014, but I remembered that it came to Singapore only in 2016. I know I was excited to finally try it out on my 6S+, and so I also encountered the pain points early on.This is where you lose me. What do you mean "a bank that supports Apple Pay"? If the shop has an NFC terminal it accepts contactless payments from any credit card that the seller accepts (MasterCard, Visa, Amex, etc.); what do the banks have to do with this, they are just a distributor. Banks cannot dictate which shops can accept the cards that they distribute, can they - that would be ludicrous.
A lot of it boils down to one word - leverage.
1) Apple has aggregated a customer base that, while small in an absolute sense compared to Android, had an outsized willingness and ability to spend. You see me parrot this refrain pretty often, both here and elsewhere, but the idea is that Apple will always win the high-end segment of the market that is willing to pay for nice things, so long as they continue to deliver a great user experience.
2) Apple is able to wield this massive leverage to get its way (more often than not at any rate). Recall how Apple used iTunes to get its way with music labels, or the iPhone to force carriers to accede to its terms. It may seem monopolistic in this day and age, but at the time, the ability to not have your phone bogged down with carrier branding or apps and being able to push updates effortlessly to the end user helped set it apart from Android handsets, and it was genuinely in the best interests of customers.
With Apple Pay, Apple once again utilises their control over hardware and software to great effect, from the software UX underpinning Apple Pay, to Touch / Face ID to secure enclave to having a billion credit cards stored in iTunes ready to be added to Apple Pay to integrating it with your iPhone and Apple Watch. It doesn't matter how good a service like PayPal is when it's simply an app on your phone that much be launched manually, vs say, launching Apple Pay on your watch to pay for a train ride or a meal at a cafe.
Credit card networks generally don't resent Apple Pay because it builds on their existing network, and it's easier to go along with Apple than risk the latter coming up with some custom solution that cuts them out entirely.
Banks are like carriers. Just as consumers were (at one point) willing to switch carriers just to use the iPhone, so too were users willing to switch to a bank that supported Apple Pay. Or at least, the idea is that banks fear this inevitability enough to hop on board and support Apple Pay.
3) This is where Apple's willingness to play the long game truly shines. Apple Pay is really a very nice service to use, Apple users are eager to use it, credit cards have no reason to not support it, and the hope is that banks and merchants fall in line for fear of losing customers. It doesn't always work, but you also see the progress Apple Pay has made over the years, and it's hard not to see Apple's guiding hand in all of this.
The only thing “special” about it is this deep integration with Apple hardware and Safari. It’s just a whole lot faster to use than a 3rd party app.
E.g. Costcos near me had finally implemented digital membership cards. But to use it, I have to start Costco app and manually go to Account tab. It’s not as convenient as just double tapping the side button.
So there was no real innovation on Apple's part. They just leveraged this hardware+software ecosystem to push their "financial service" platform ahead of other services. I smell the European Commission coming in to fix this.
The European has already mandated Apple to allow third party default Wallets. As they should.So there was no real innovation on Apple's part. They just leveraged this hardware+software ecosystem to push their "financial service" platform ahead of other services. I smell the European Commission coming in to fix this.
Fix what ? You can use any bank c/c with Apple Pay. There’s no lock in. It’s just Apple’s marketing term for their NFC payment implementation.So there was no real innovation on Apple's part. They just leveraged this hardware+software ecosystem to push their "financial service" platform ahead of other services. I smell the European Commission coming in to fix this.
And yet the European companies are allowed to remotely disable expensive equipment if customers use 3rd party repair parts, or if that equipment stops phoning home.The European has already mandated Apple to allow third party default Wallets. As they should.
They finally started taking Apple Pay at my local HD last week, they’re rolling it out to all stores. They were the last holdout of my regular stores, so I’ve been ecstaticSend it to home depot.
That doesn't make Apple Pay inferior to Wechat pay. You can use Apple Pay almost anywhere in the world. You can only use Wechat Pay in China. And foreigners can't use it, you have to have a Chinese bank account. I have a Wechat account but couldn't use it when I was visiting my wife's family just this year. Also, Apple pay does not require expensive equipment by the merchant. You can get a Square NFC reader for less than 60 bucks. Apple Pay is now accepted by about 95% of retailers.Yet more undeserved praise for Tim Cook's mediocrity. Apple Pay is an inferior technology to mainland China's WeChat Pay, which was released over one year earlier than Apple Pay. (Apple Pay was released in October 2014, and WeChat Pay was released in August 2013.) Apple Pay initially required an NFC machine for the seller, but now the seller can also use just another Apple device. WeChat Pay requires the seller only to have a piece of paper with a QR code printed on it. No wonder practically every seller in mainland China—even poor people from the remote countryside who sell fruits out of old wooden pushcarts on the side of the road—accept WeChat Pay. But here in the U.S., there are still many brick-and-mortar stores that don't accept Apple Pay.
I'm fully aware of the WeChat app's shortcomings (such as lack of privacy). But I'm not talking about the entire WeChat app. I'm only talking about the WeChat Pay function, and saying that Apple Pay is a much inferior technology in comparison. Apple Pay's requirement for sellers to have expensive technological equipment prohibits it from becoming ubiquitous. A printed piece of paper with a QR code on it that costs only a couple of cents to print at a print shop is why WeChat Pay is practically accepted everywhere in mainland China, and precisely why mainland China was the first and practically only cashless society in the world. I'm not talking at all about politics here. I'm only talking about payment methods.
Tim Cook is mediocre, and that's why Apple Pay is not like WeChat Pay. Cook deserves no praise for Apple Pay. Although Apple Pay is better than using cash or phisical credit and debit cards, Apple Pay is not ubiquitous, and thus people in the U.S. still need to carry cash and physical credit and debit cards with them. In mainland China, it's commonplace for people to practically never need to use cash nor physical credit and debit cards. That's the case in mainland China practically everywhere from the most advanced and modern wealthy big cities like Shanghai to the most backwards and poor remote countryside areas. It shows how Cook is not a products person.
Home Depot already finished their rollout to all storesYes, but at least Wal-Mart does provide a way to pay with your phone using any credit card through their app, albeit with the data collection caveats. Home Depot on the other hand provides no way to do any kind of mobile payment. Every time I go to the register there I have a ‘Doh!’ moment and have to run out to my car to grab a card.
Supposedly, Home Depot has enabled Apple Pay at a few locations in the past couple of weeks but a message their support folks posted on Reddit said that at this point they are just ‘exploring’ different payment options and there is no word on whether they’ll actually roll out Apple Pay company-wide.
Actually, no, not all banks allow their cards to be added to Apple Wallet, the bank has to have an agreement with Apple. But most of them do, in the US.Fix what ? You can use any bank c/c with Apple Pay. There’s no lock in. It’s just Apple’s marketing term for their NFC payment implementation.
The real advantage of AP is its integration with their devices, keychain, FaceID etc.
As to the EU - they are always ready to “fix” something that was developed outside of EU, but are rather shy to go after non-competitive practices of European giants like Siemens. So the extent of them “fixing” things is not as great as you may think - they don’t want to get the US and China into fixing mood.
Thanks. All of mine do, so I didn’t realize not all of them did.Actually, no, not all banks allow their cards to be added to Apple Wallet, the bank has to have an agreement with Apple. But most of them do, in the US.