Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Guess I'm old (46). I don't want anything to do with this ar/metaverse nonsense at all. I don't want a headset. I don't want glasses. I don't want implants. And I'm super tired of being presented with for-profit visions of the future.
Yes the Dystopian future scares many people. They are irrelevant. 20 years from now Surgeons will operate using AR/AI Medical technology that will completely transform health care. You won’t want to be a part of that “nonsense”.
 
You're right Timmy, nobody wants that "Meta" BS, but guess what! Most average people also don't want your AR/VR drug you're trying so hard to shove into our throats. We are already addicted to your iToys and they distract us enough in our every day lives even causing accidents in some cases and deaths, so please don't make matters worse with selling us even more addictive technology and distraction.

"As he often does, Cook also spoke on the importance of programming as a universal language, and he touched on topics like climate change, recycling, and politics."

LMAO!!!! Of course, he has to show he is a "good person" and give woke speeches even though he has enough money in the bank to live like a god. What a hypocrite...

Class resentment and embittered anti-tech consumers won’t matter in the future. They will adapt or die.
 
I’m sure metaporn in the metaverse will be the next gazillion dollar industry
The Porn industry led the way in producing mass distribution of content in the first decade of the internet. Befor that, Some observers credit the porn industry with VHS becoming the de facto standard for consumer home video display over Sony’s Beta format. Consumers around the globe will eagerly move to whatever platform emerges to feed their appetite. It matters little what the many embittered and bewildered respondents here in MacRumors think. This coming tsunami will wash away millions of jobs and create many opportunities. the uneducated and the anti-tech crowd are irrelevant.
 
Soon, you too can be a Metaverse/Appleverse zombie. You’ll just need a headset and a big bank account.

You’ll eventually find yourself with IAP just to breathe the fake hot air they’re blowing at you.
Yes the uneducated have little future in the globalized “knowledge worker” era. But the “uneducated” and “anti-technology” crowd will be completely wiped out. It’s going to be an exciting future!!! BRING IT!
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 1557750
I'm half your age and I feel the same way.

I sometimes feel like I have a different approach to technology than many people my age: I still view computers and phones as tools. Not as a universe to get immersed in or something I want thinking for me. That's why I can't get interested in digital assistants, let alone the "metaverse" and AR/VR glasses/goggles. I like a certain distance between me and technology and I like to have control over it.
I just bought an Ultra. I had been iWatch resistant for years thinking I couldn’t put “distance between me and technology”. I’ve only had it a week. It’s still early yet. But I read everything I could on minimizing “alerts” and disruption by the device and I enabled the available barriers to losing “control”. I’ve been surprised at how effective it’s been. Having this tech portal on my wrist has been “calming” in it’s presence. Now yes I could slip down the slippery…. But for now, I’m good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThisBougieLife
You're right Timmy, nobody wants that "Meta" BS, but guess what! Most average people also don't want your AR/VR drug you're trying so hard to shove into our throats. We are already addicted to your iToys and they distract us enough in our every day lives even causing accidents in some cases and deaths, so please don't make matters worse with selling us even more addictive technology and distraction.

"As he often does, Cook also spoke on the importance of programming as a universal language, and he touched on topics like climate change, recycling, and politics."

LMAO!!!! Of course, he has to show he is a "good person" and give woke speeches even though he has enough money in the bank to live like a god. What a hypocrite...
It’s been mentioned in passing a few times. It’s hardly been shoved down anyone’s throats.

Blaming Tim Cook, or even Apple at all for the dangers of driving or other accident causing activities whilst using a phone is hilarious. Apple didn’t invent phones, and Tim Cook’s Apple wasn’t even the Apple that introduced it. It’s merely a technology problem which cannot be placed at the feet of any one specific company, let alone singling out a sole person to blame.

Try taking control of one’s own life and choose not to be distracted by tech enough to cause an accident. Or better still, don’t purchase it in the first place.

All that said, calling him ‘Timmy’ and using buzzwords like ‘woke’ - I suspect some people are just channeling whatever weird anger or hatred they have for a company and its CEO into this topic, but it could be about anything.
 
The Metaverse is a sad place that the ZuckerLizard will be the last person to leave.

You won't even need a full size bus when it's time for everyone there to go. A 15 passenger van will do just nicely.

I admittedly find a great deal of schadenfreude in Zuckerberg's failings. I like seeing stock in his company tank. I like seeing how horribly depressing the Metaverse is. I like seeing his revenue fall.

Meta AKA Facebook is simply a terrible thing. On par with cigarettes and fast food. I left social media almost 2 years ago, and what a good move that was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
It’s been mentioned in passing a few times. It’s hardly been shoved down anyone’s throats.

Blaming Tim Cook, or even Apple at all for the dangers of driving or other accident causing activities whilst using a phone is hilarious. Apple didn’t invent phones, and Tim Cook’s Apple wasn’t even the Apple that introduced it. It’s merely a technology problem which cannot be placed at the feet of any one specific company, let alone singling out a sole person to blame.

Try taking control of one’s own life and choose not to be distracted by tech enough to cause an accident. Or better still, don’t purchase it in the first place.

All that said, calling him ‘Timmy’ and using buzzwords like ‘woke’ - I suspect some people are just channeling whatever weird anger or hatred they have for a company and its CEO into this topic, but it could be about anything.
Please “Cupcakes. Don’t post too many of these “thoughtful” drama-free observations. Ive got to have a cup of coffee now, to clear my head. ————-Laughs!
 
The next decade or two will be an interesting battle

I do get the feeling the Metaverse will be huge starting out - will it become a fad remains the question.

Zuckerberg is counting on it being bigger than Facebook and Instagram - and maybe for the next generation of teens/20 somethings it will be.

AR/VR seems like it will be more of a tool than an escape or item of entertainment. Hoping it’s both.
 
Guess I'm old (46). I don't want anything to do with this ar/metaverse nonsense at all. I don't want a headset. I don't want glasses. I don't want implants. And I'm super tired of being presented with for-profit visions of the future.
Has anyone told you that the tech industry aren't forcing you to buy one?
 
I think augmented reality (tech overlays that can make supplement our lives and offer a productive utility) will be hugely beneficial in this way. The metaverse seems more live a short term game environment vs anything else
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
I think augmented reality (tech overlays that can make supplement our lives and offer a productive utility) will be hugely beneficial in this way. The metaverse seems more live a short term game environment vs anything else
Hugely beneficial for who though? For the average consumers or medical and science application?
 
Metaverse sounds like a goggle version of Second Life. Second Life didn't really have anything to offer most folk even though it was heavily promoted, even by businesses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ritmomundo
Everything Tim Cook has said – including in this article (!!) – is in opposition to the idea of Apple releasing a virtual reality headset, and in support of augmented reality and bringing people into the real world, with the internet overlaid on top of it, yet speculating sites like MacRumors and others insist that Apple is developing a VR headset.

Everything Apple has been doing since the launch of the iPhone has been trying to pull back our addiction to our phones and being more present. The Watch was the first manifestation of that, allowing us to carry technology with us and have access to the rich world of the internet and interconnectivity without getting lost in our phones, and instead while engaging in the real world, running, going on walks, playing sports, hiking and even diving – all in the spirit of experiencing life.

It makes no sense that they'd release a headset that goes against all of those guiding principles. I strongly believe that what Apple is releasing is an AR device, not a VR headset.

While Tim says that VR is fine for set periods and is not meant to live our lives in, it defeats the purpose of launching a device built for VR at all. They're working on a device that they want you to use for limited periods? It makes no sense to go back on their journey of building devices that enable users to being more present, even if it's just for one device before going to AR. They'll release an AR first device from the start.

I think we're about to be treated to Apple at its best. When the iPhone launched, many of the concepts and technology it was built on were 5 years ahead of their time. There were rumours of an Apple Phone or an iPod Phone but we did not think we'd see a pocket device running an operating system built on OS X, a full computer in our pockets which is why we saw the reactions from the crowd that I don't think we've seen from any product launch since. I suspect we'll see Apple's wearable AR glasses revealed to the world. They may not be seamless glasses at first and may look like tech, but they'll be AR first with perhaps the capability of running virtual reality experiences.
 
From Private Eye 2021

IMG_0041.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: uczcret and Morod
Come on Tim we understand it perfectly. The metaverse will allow people to buy meta houses and other VR things because they can't afford real ones. or people can buy virtual sex because buying real sex is illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Guess I'm old (46). I don't want anything to do with this ar/metaverse nonsense at all. I don't want a headset. I don't want glasses. I don't want implants. And I'm super tired of being presented with for-profit visions of the future.
But you keep posting and reading the article. Just move on, gramps!
 
I think Meta's metaverse will fail not because it's cgi but because it's insincere.

The Apple/Microsoft/Google metaverse will likely be based on the real world; like walking on the Moon or endless digital museums. Personally that's the angle I'd drive; that VR/AR solves the time/place/logistics problem of (many) real-world adventures.

I mean, headphones have done that to music (anywhere/anytime). Sure, a live concert is incomparable, but that doesn't mean non-live music isn't enjoyable too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ipedro
Seriously? A billion dollars can’t buy this guy a better hair cut?
 
My understanding is its a place where you quit your real life and live in an imaginary life. He is trying to create The Matrix.

AR and VR has been talked about so long but its not picking up and now I am very skeptical if it ever will unless something technological advancement happens that makes it in the hands of the general public like phone cameras. Video cameras used to cost like $300-500 in the 90s , now they are a free bundle on a cellphone...like my front facing camera that I never use.
 
Same here, 44 years old, not once ever interested in AR/VR. I'm also not on any social media networks and never have, so I guess I'm an outlier.
Have you ever built anything from a kit? Walked somewhere to which you needed directions? Gone to the grocery store?

You do not think it would be easier if you had glasses on that identified the next piece and showed you how to move it to put it into place, and exactly where it went? Have you had Maps talk in your ear while you were walking to give you directions? How about either glasses showing you arrows to get you to the aisle and product you want? Those are all AR and there are a million more of those examples.
 
Hugely beneficial for who though? For the average consumers or medical and science application?


I mentioned already ar is heavily used in cars with overhead displays and parking assistance. Most people are using it already without even acknowledging they are.
 
Haha, Tim

Zuckerberg says there will be 1 billion people using metaverse in the next 10 years:


I'll laugh at you before Zuckerberg who isn't totally crazy with that forecast.

VR's growing leaps and bounds, and once someone gets the head sets smaller and lighter and gets the user experience right, it's going to be a firestorm of adoption and growth.

In 2019, 14 million VR headsets were sold. In 2021, AR/VR device shipments grew 92.1% year over year. *This is not crap like Google Cardboard and Samsung's phone VR which both died deaths prior. These were Vive and Occulus level headsets.

It is now a $12 billion market. Hardware/user experience and developer support are VR's barriers. There aren't really any AAA VR experiences (or AR for that matter) because the user base doesn't justify that type of investment for development but it's growing.

VR glasses have already been invented and are not many years away. The data and facts are not in your favor. It was predicted that the market wouldn't hit over $12 billion until at least 2024 and beat estimates by two years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.