But leasing is still more expensive than buying, all else equal. You’re getting smoked for bringing home a new car every 18 months, and I’m sure you know that.I view like this: There is no way to game the system. Whether leasing or owning the car companies win. The only way to make a few bucks in the game is if you buy and keep the car for over 8 years and are incredibly lucky and never have a major repair whilst out of warranty. Drive the same old car for 8 years, there goes the transmission, and in one shot there goes all your savings, you should instead of chosen to lease perpetually as you'd have been in your third new car at that junction with $0 in out of warranty costs.
Yes, smart rich people lease because the delta between buying/selling and leasing perpetually is such a small amount it doesn't move our needle either way and if you choose the right car company with the right warranty you'll never have a repair or maintenance bill. That and you're always in a brand new car which is a great luxury to have. The way I've set up my lease and my wife's lease we're bringing home a new car every 18 months, gets the kids excited.
You’re paying for the luxury of trading your car every 3 years. At the end of 3 years, you had the pleasure of driving it and nothing else. It’s renting.
I don’t know your definition of rich, but I can afford to lease cars and I still choose to buy. Everything moves the needle, just how much is relative.
Objectively, leasing is more expensive than buying and driving for a reasonable period of time. Of course if you buy new and trade every 3 years, it’s worse than leasing. But these people leasing thinking they are saving money are just stupid.
Leasing today is a means of getting into a more expensive car for most people. It’s all about monthly payment for most. I pay cash for my cars, so it’s a one time expense until the next one.