That’s your reason? Wow. Some people.I'll stick with Spotify. Apple has enough money.
			
				Last edited by a moderator: 
			
		
	
										
										
								
								
											
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
										
									
								That’s your reason? Wow. Some people.I'll stick with Spotify. Apple has enough money.
or wear a do-rag for the apple presentation.This goody two shoes act needs stop. Slip F-bomb every now and then, geez.
oh christ, you re probably blaring "gonna fly now, like rockhead now...."
Wait.The algorithms in Spotify are better than Apple Music IMO. I don't give a crap about your personalized teams of people. I want to easily follow artists, get the new releases of those artists and receive some of the best recommendations for new music based on artists I follow. Apple Music misses the mark on these things. It isn't as flexible either.
Rocky theme, the 1976 movie, with talia shireI'm not sure what that is
not anymore, well my music selections i can't.Wait.
I thought you could "follow" Artists in AM.
...and have YOU contacted your Congresscritter to ask for the same?I did not see Tim Crook asking congress for better streaming rates for music.
Pompous is putting it lightly.Sounds a bit too pompous. Lighten up, Timmy, you're a multi-millionaire and most others are not - we'll take that a bit too self-servingly.
I would actually like to use that feature to find more music that I like but unfortunately I always get the same recommendations. It‘s either music I already listen to or Hip-Hop/Rap which I hate. Disliking doesn‘t help either. I‘ve already deleted the handful Hip-Hop/Rap songs that were in my library, disliked every single Hip-Hop/Rap playlist and „Essential“ album and redid the „Choose Artists for You“ several times. Their Algorithms are just crap. They should work on them instead of saying "We worry about the humanity being drained out of music, about it becoming a bits-and-bytes kind of world instead of the art and craft.".
"Music inspires, it motivates. It's also the thing at night that helps quiet me. I think it's better than any medicine," said. Timé Cook
Time Cook's playlist:
"Money for Nothing," Dire Straits
“I would listen to more country music if i knew what country they were singing about”
My dad, 2005
Would you prefer a more typical Silicon Valley response like "Break stuff and try to fix it fast" or "Don't worry, AI is the future of everything"?Sounds a bit too pompous. Lighten up, Timmy, you're a multi-millionaire and most others are not - we'll take that a bit too self-servingly.
"They" are giving you hip hop for a deliberate reason. All the music services do. Of course the reason cannot be mentioned here.
Wait.
I thought you could "follow" Artists in AM.
You realize that you don't own anything if you purchase the MP3 or even the CD or album, right? In the case of physical media, you only own the plastic or vinyl that the music lives on. You never own the music itself. You can make copies but you can also make copies of purchased MP3s too so long as they do not have any DRM. If they do have DRM, it means they are in the cloud and available anywhere in the world at anytime so the need to make a copy of those tracks are pointless.This is exactly why I'm still not an Apple Music subscriber. I enjoy owning all the music I can listen to and not having a never ending subscription or a spotty internet connection holding my music hostage.
I get the convenience of having such a vast (though nowhere near comprehensive) music library at your fingertips, but the streaming/subscription model has partly, what I feel, taken the personal/curated/human quality out of listening to music.
And just like all these other cloud-based subscription services where you never actually "own" anything, as soon as you have no/poor internet, you have nothing; as soon as you stop paying for the tether, you have nothing.
That's not to mention, once you hand over the keys to Apple Music, what you can and can't listen to (through the service) is now completely at Apple's and the music labels' discretion. No thank you.
You have it backwards. Algorithms are still primitive and cannot possibly measure our experience or enjoyment of a track or any part of any album. DJs (the good ones at least) can read the room and adjust to it based on the feedback from real people in real time. Once wearable sensors become more powerful and commonplace, we will see real advances in AI music selection. Right now it's just dumb algorithms that are mostly based on what the record labels are pushing anyway.Bullhonkey.
When a computer notices that I enjoy one type of music, and infers from the behavior of other users that I will like another type of music, that isn't a loss of humanity. That's humanity enhanced. It's music democratized.
Contrast that with a D.J., interested in playing the sort of music they enjoy. Or are paid to play. Or think they should play, based on what is fashionable e.g. for sale. Far from being humane, this is the corporatization of music. It does not respect me or my tastes, but expects me to listen to what a handful of tastemakers think is interesting.
I have never liked a record because of the way the artist posts on Instagram. Spotify knows this. Apple Music doesn't.
Well nuts to that. Thank heavens for Spotify Weekly and its accurate model of my odd tastes, connecting me with surprising new music every week because of other peoples' odd tastes. This is just one of the reasons Spotify is a vastly superior product to Apple Music; others include the fact that it is much faster, the interface is much better, the sharing tools work with Android, the free tier means even my beat-ass friends can enjoy it and the family plan is quite fairly priced. It also doesn't try to advertise itself to me EVERY TIME I OPEN THE MUSIC APP TO LISTEN TO THE MUSIC THAT I PAID FOR.