Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes....Yes..... TIm, very nice..


Now, get back to work... Break time is over...

I guess Tim cared enough to make it public, but why do we care ??

We just like Apple, and always will. Regardless who runs the company, and their sexuality..

Apple uses aren't going anywhere.
 
That's a direct insult to God! Implying that God made a mistake I don't think so. He has a choice and so does everyone else. If you ever read the bible you would know God created us with the specific power of choice.

Did you choose to be right or left handed? Not everything is about choice. The idea that ”free will” is something clear and absolute is something that has no ground. We are affected by our surroundings and we choose (at least we think we do) based on that. But some thing we don't choose. Sexuality most probably isn't something you choose: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7456588.stm

Anyway, how someone can think the god in the Bible is real is beyond me. He's all powerful but has to rest? He gets angry? He punishes several people over things just a few has done? Clearly most reasonably a man made character.

He also says to Moses that it is filthy if a man lay with a man. So, I don't know if the god described in the Bible is the god Tim subscribes to. Oh, well…
 
The sowjet union was based on atheism (the self proclaimed "it's not a religion"- religion) and over 20 millionen christians and other religious people were tortured and murdered because they did not renounce their faith. So anit-religion has killed millions, too in very recent times. atrocities in the name of christianity happened centuries ago.

I agree. This is what i always say. everyone has a religion, atheists are just in denial about it.

These are exactly some of the examples I had in mind. Well put. In China there is great persecution of Christians even today. Sadly, I suspect it won't be long before we see it beginning in earnest here (no one likes to be told that what they are doing is wrong and even less so when they believe it can lead to violence ... and let's face it, many people who opposed homosexuality have acted very hatefully. People are not very mature.).
 
So you want to live in a world where this kind of thing isn't news? Me too. Ask Tim, he's the one that made the statement. He could've kept it to himself wouldn't have made a difference either way to me. So in effect, it could be a "not news" thing but everyone is deciding to make it news. That being said I think it's stupid that people have to "come forward" Just live you life, who the hell cares what anyone thinks. This is America people are supposed to be free to do whatever they want.

You clearly didn't read past the first line of what I wrote.

My point was maybe one day it won't be news. But it is now. And just because what he said didn't make a difference either way to you doesn't mean it didn't make any difference to some.

As you said America is "supposed to be free (for people) to do what they want", but it is not. Not yet. When it is, this won't be news.
 
The sowjet union was based on atheism (the self proclaimed "it's not a religion"- religion) and over 20 million christians and other religious people were tortured and murdered because they did not renounce their faith. So anit-religion has killed millions, too in very recent times. atrocities in the name of christianity happened centuries ago.

Geez, has WWII been that long ago?
 
I'm not a 'bible-thumper' but I am a Christian. Jesus taught us to love one another; not to judge or hate. So I'm trying to be a decent person despite my many faults.

Please don't lump all the people who follow the bible into one shallow category. There's good and bad among all of us, as with any other group.

Thanks.

Wasn't singling out religion. I was referring to politicians that meet ALL of the criteria in that sentence.
 
I like the guy and respect his work ethic. But i still don't agree with same-sex marriage.
 
You clearly didn't read past the first line of what I wrote.

My point was maybe one day it won't be news. But it is now. And just because what he said didn't make a difference either way to you doesn't mean it didn't make any difference to some.

As you said America is "supposed to be free (for people) to do what they want", but it is not. Not yet. When it is, this won't be news.

I disagree. Who is stopping Tim Cook from being gay? They allow naked people to strut about downtown San Francisco and no one bats an eye. I don't see this oppression.

It sounds more like you want everyone to not only tolerate this lifestyle, but you want us all to accept it and celebrate it. Not gonna happen.
 
Did you ever have to fight for your right based on your race, gender or sex behavior?
When I lived in asia I dealt with some pretty bad racists. they do not like white folks there.

I understand Tim Cooks statement that he feels more understanding for other minorities because of his gayness, but it's still nothing to be proud of.

----------

Geez, has WWII been that long ago?
I am not following.
 
You can't look at the tenants of liberalism and come to any other conclusion.

"Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty (which is especially stressed in classical liberalism) and equality (which is more evident in social or welfare liberalism). Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property."

My word, you're right. They sound like a ghastly bunch of people and should be sectioned under the mental health act.
 
Don't start with the Hitler was a Christian crap. It's been debunked.


Done.

Never claimed it. He used it to his advantage to gain the support of the citizens. Exactly comparable to all of the people killed in the name of Islam that other Muslims disavow themselves of. Christianity is not immune to being used for atrocities, and that carries forth to this day.
 
You said, "John Lennon called from the grave, he wants his hippy view back."
Answer = Very ironic that you used this. Although John was an atheist, much of his music was inspired by what he learned in Scripture.

Im going to address this last.


You said, "Love does not put food on the table and a roof over one's head."
Answer = Believe me, sometimes it is my decision to love my family that keeps me at my job in order to provide these things.

As I stated before, your example is your example and does not equate the same view for everyone else.



You said, "You don't need love to want to protect someone else, being a good person and not wanting to see someone else hurt is more then enough but that doesn't equate to being love."
Answer = I think we may be confused in our terms. Love, by definition, is protects. It is selfless. What you are describing is loving behavior, although I will give you that if you, for example, saved a girl from a sinking ship just so you could rape her once you got to a deserted island, then saving her in the first place had very unloving motives.


Love by definition. Instead of quoting Im just going to link it. Love holds a number of different meanings. We can play semantics over the word love but then we're getting into just plan subjective view, which I guess you've already started with your personal examples of love.

The example you provide is pretty sad and a bit psychopathic. How about saving a person from a sinking ship, just because it's the right thing to do. The fact that you try to throw in rape into that example shows you have a bit of some dark side of yourself to work through.




You said, "The way you posted comes off that you can't be a good person who can stay off drugs unless you have god and that's simply just not true ... [People] can have the same drive to do good for their fellow man, stay away from drugs and be pretty much exactly like you without faith, god and ultimate love. People can be good for the simple reason of just wanting to be good.
Answer = I am not saying that people who don't believe in God can't do good, loving things. They most certainly can. My observation has been that without a Judeo-Christian moral framework, people tend to find more ways of rationalizing selfish behavior. The teaching of the Scripture don't let you get away with that. It is hard as nails.



Again you show a subjective view that's limited to you. Just like you I have my own subjective view, one that sees religion, specifically yours as nothing more then the blind leading the blind all for the hopes of getting into a special place. In seeing that, I don't see selflessness but selfishness because of the fear and hope of ending up in one place and not another. Where an atheist doing good, is very simply doing it for the sake of doing it and not some potential reward or punishment.



You said, "John Lennon called from the grave, he wants his hippy view back."
Answer = Very ironic that you used this. Although John was an atheist, much of his music was inspired by what he learned in Scripture.

As for Lennon, Ill let his words speak for him.

Lennon: "If you say you don't believe in God, everybody assumes you're antireligious, and you probably think that's what we mean by that. We're not quite sure 'what' we are, but I know that we're more agnostic than atheistic."


Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a god....that's it, nothing more to it. That says nothing about scripture or even some religious views. As an atheists, not believing in god does not in anyway mean I can't find value in scripture itself. After all, as an atheist, scripture is nothing more then words written by man for man. We do not believe it is the inspired word of god but of man. It also means it doesn't really matters who wrote it if it has meaning to those who read it. For example....

Great liars are also great magicians.

He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.

Hate is more lasting than dislike.

Above are quotes by Hitler, now just because Hitler said them, doesn't mean that seeing the value or truth in those statements somehow means you accept Hitler and follow him. It simply means you can see the statements for what they are worth, nothing more. The same goes for scripture, just because Lennon might have been inspired by scripture, doesn't mean anything beyond that, just that he found meaning in words that happened to also be scripture.
 
Don't start with the Hitler was a Christian crap. It's been debunked.
I am german and I have a minor university degree in history here. I have never heard anyone claim that Hitler was a christian. His mentors choose him because they thought he was the "german christ" and they invented "positive christianity" to slowly convert the ,predominantly christian, german populus to naziism. Rosenberg and Eckart, the masterminds behind the third reich, rejected christianity.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietrich_Eckart




Way too many pseudo-intellectuals in this thread now.

(and non-intellectuals I should add)
Speak fo yourself.
 
"Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty (which is especially stressed in classical liberalism) and equality (which is more evident in social or welfare liberalism). Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property."

My word, you're right. They sound like a ghastly bunch of people and should be sectioned under the mental health act.

This does not describe today's liberal. Free and fair elections would mean no voter fraud. Allowing those to vote without showing ID Allows non legal individuals the opportunity to vote. Affirmative action does not allow for equality unless you fall into special categories. Today's liberal is closer to something akin to a 1950 communist or socialist. JFK would be considered a right wing lunatic by today's standards.

----------

Never claimed it. He used it to his advantage to gain the support of the citizens. Exactly comparable to all of the people killed in the name of Islam that other Muslims disavow themselves of. Christianity is not immune to being used for atrocities, and that carries forth to this day.

I'd love to hear some of the atrocities being carried out by Christians today. And I apologize for jumping the gun on the "Hitler was a Christian" thing. I've heard that argument used a lot.
 
that's a direct insult to god! Implying that god made a mistake i don't think so. He has a choice and so does everyone else. If you ever read the bible you would know god created us with the specific power of choice.



lol

----------

Don't start with the Hitler was a Christian crap. It's been debunked.


Done.


:rolleyes:
Adolf Hitler: As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.
 
Im going to address this last.

As I stated before, your example is your example and does not equate the same view for everyone else.

Love by definition. Instead of quoting Im just going to link it. Love holds a number of different meanings. We can play semantics over the word love but then we're getting into just plan subjective view, which I guess you've already started with your personal examples of love.

The example you provide is pretty sad and a bit psychopathic. How about saving a person from a sinking ship, just because it's the right thing to do.
No argument there.

The fact that you try to throw in rape into that example shows you have a bit of some dark side of yourself to work through.
I work to fight sex trafficking and live around people who are daily dealing with the fallout of violence done to them and their loved ones. That's the darkness vibe you're picking up. I do hope you realize I was condemning the rape in my example.

Again you show a subjective view that's limited to you. Just like you I have my own subjective view, one that sees religion, specifically yours as nothing more then the blind leading the blind all for the hopes of getting into a special place. In seeing that, I don't see selflessness but selfishness because of the fear and hope of ending up in one place and not another. Where an atheist doing good, is very simply doing it for the sake of doing it and not some potential reward or punishment.
You seem to be making this argument: there is no true altruism. Funny I don't often see people who say this going out to build hospitals in third world countries.


As for Lennon, Ill let his words speak for him.
Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a god....that's it, nothing more to it. That says nothing about scripture or even some religious views. As an atheists, not believing in god does not in anyway mean I can't find value in scripture itself. After all, as an atheist, scripture is nothing more then words written by man for man. We do not believe it is the inspired word of god but of man. It also means it doesn't really matters who wrote it if it has meaning to those who read it. For example....

Atheism. The uncola of religions.


Above are quotes by Hitler, now just because Hitler said them, doesn't mean that seeing the value or truth in those statements somehow means you accept Hitler and follow him. It simply means you can see the statements for what they are worth, nothing more. The same goes for scripture, just because Lennon might have been inspired by scripture, doesn't mean anything beyond that, just that he found meaning in words that happened to also be scripture.
I bring up the connection of Lennon to Scripture because he got his ideas of right and wrong from a society built on their principals.
 
So you want to live in a world where this kind of thing isn't news? Me too. Ask Tim, he's the one that made the statement. He could've kept it to himself wouldn't have made a difference either way to me. So in effect, it could be a "not news" thing but everyone is deciding to make it news. That being said I think it's stupid that people have to "come forward" Just live you life, who the hell cares what anyone thinks. This is America people are supposed to be free to do whatever they want.

I agree 100%. I wish they would stop feeling the need to "come out of the closet" and make it our business. I wish they would stop advertising their sexuality all over their cars, houses, and businesses. I wish I could have the rainbow back as a sign of something heavenly, good and non-sexual. I wish they didn't feel the need to have pride parades. I wish they would just be happy and integrate into society and be accepted for who they are, like the everyone else. I wish they would just live their lives and be happy.
 
I disagree. Who is stopping Tim Cook from being gay? They allow naked people to strut about downtown San Francisco and no one bats an eye. I don't see this oppression.

It sounds more like you want everyone to not only tolerate this lifestyle, but you want us all to accept it and celebrate it. Not gonna happen.

Nobody wants you to wear a thong and prance around West Hollywood every year to celebrate "Gay Day".

I don't "celebrate" being gay.

I just get on with my life like everybody else and all I ask is that:

My partner is recognised as my next of kin
Should I need to seek employment that I am not discriminated against because of my sexuality
And a few other rights that you take for granted.

You don't lose any rights. You can still also carry on doing what you do with all the rights that white male Christians have had since the founding of the USA.
 
I am german and I have a minor university degree in history here. I have never heard anyone claim that Hitler was a christian. His mentors choose him because they thought he was the "german christ" and they invented "positive christianity" to slowly convert the ,predominantly christian, german populus to naziism. Rosenberg and Eckart, the masterminds behind the third reich, rejected christianity.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietrich_Eckart

I happened to discuss with people believing Hitler and the third Reich to be associated with christianity. The origin of the belief seems to be the "Gott mit uns" motto on the Wehrmacht soldiers' belts. Actually the motto and his use on German military apparel predates the third Reich, but still it most likely impresses people.
 
Hitler said all sorts of bizare things. He and his gang of thugs were an amazing asortment of mass murdering weirdos. Hitler was a Nazi. Naziism is a religion initself. He grew up in a catholic environment but he was not a christian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.