You can't knock the performance from a investor's perspective.
The cons on Tim Cook compared to Steve is how much more Steve would obese over details on products and marketing. Tim seems like a guy who doesn't like doing giant in person events where Steve treated it like a show and was a magician up there. He probably would have scrutinized things like the Vision Pro much more.
With that said I do think we got some benefits from Tim with just mass amount of choices in hardware which I have no doubts Steve wouldn't have had as much. Everyone complains about the lack of 'pro' level stuff but that direction was set when Steve was in charge as he was focused on the money makers iOS. Final Cut X was dumb down with criticism at release and the direction of the trashcan Mac Pro would have been in development when Steve was around.
The cons on Tim Cook compared to Steve is how much more Steve would obese over details on products and marketing. Tim seems like a guy who doesn't like doing giant in person events where Steve treated it like a show and was a magician up there. He probably would have scrutinized things like the Vision Pro much more.
With that said I do think we got some benefits from Tim with just mass amount of choices in hardware which I have no doubts Steve wouldn't have had as much. Everyone complains about the lack of 'pro' level stuff but that direction was set when Steve was in charge as he was focused on the money makers iOS. Final Cut X was dumb down with criticism at release and the direction of the trashcan Mac Pro would have been in development when Steve was around.
