Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook explained in an interview that Steve Jobs wanted a normal transition from CEO to next CEO for once, as previously, all appointed CEOs were due to some kind of crisis.

With all those execs leaving, this looks like a new crisis for Apple. Not sure Tim Cook will leave before that has stabilised.

I also think the board might strongly want Cook to stay as CEO while the current administration remains in the White House. Horrible as it looks, Cook seems to know how to handle that in a way that protects the shareholders, and that's whose interests the board is looking after. A new CEO would be a gamble. If the current POTUS decided he "just didn't like" the CEO, Apple would be in trouble.
 
Last edited:
It isn't like he is going to confirm it before its officially announced.
And when he does, it won't be a case of him "stepping back" from Apple, it will be moving to a different position in Apple - i.e. Chairman of the board of directors. So anything he's said is technically accurate.
 
The mess of Apple Intelligence and outright lies sold to customers about its capabilities has severely damaged his legacy. Also while I can live with Liquid glass on my iPhone, I do not want it on my MacBook Pro that is my work machine. I'm continually telling my Mac not to update to Tahoe. I'd rather skip it. It's just a UI mess and doesn't translate to the Mac at all. I've used Macs since 1997 and its possibly the worse itteration, in terms of UI, I've used.
 


In an interview with Good Morning America's Michael Strahan this week, Apple's CEO Tim Cook responded to rumors about his potential retirement.

Tim-Cook-MacBook-16x9.jpeg

Cook said the idea that he wants to step back at Apple is merely "a rumor."

Cook did not explicitly confirm or deny that he will be stepping down as CEO any time soon, but he said "I can't imagine life without Apple."

The full interview clip is available on YouTube below.


Last year, the Financial Times reported that Apple was preparing for Cook to step down as soon as early 2026, but it is already mid-March, so that timeframe has either already passed or is nearing its expiry date depending on who you ask.

Apple's Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, John Ternus, is widely viewed as Cook's most likely successor. Cook reportedly gave oversight of Apple's design teams to Ternus at the end of last year, and Ternus has been making a lot more public appearances in interviews and in product introduction videos over the past few years.

Cook has been Apple's CEO since August 2011, and he turned 65 last year.

Whenever he steps down, Cook could always become the executive chairman of Apple's board of directors, so he may play a key role in the company for years to come.

Article Link: Apple CEO Tim Cook Responds to Retirement Rumors
It is a great that Tim spoke to clear up the rumor. He has done such a great job to make Apple great in financial performance and product offerings. He should stay as long as he wants to always keep Apple doing great! He is a role model for Samsung and other technology especially cellphone and company companies. 👍👍👍
 
Love him or not, he's made Apple into an insane machine. There's been hiccups but I think he's done a pretty good job.

My wishlist:

4. Backlit touchid keyboard
For the life of me I can’t understand why this hasn’t happened yet. Seems like an obvious accessory for a company that caters to creatives and creative professionals, many of whom work in dimly lit environments. Not to mention their customers with accessibility issues.

I grumble a little every time I have to type my password in just because I work at night. Maybe they should fire Tim Cook… 😅
 
Just fire him if he doesn’t leave peacefully.
On what grounds? Phone sales are at an all time high, services revenue is up, laptop sales are great. From a business perspective, there is no reason the board would want him gone. He would need to get massively "canceled" to be ousted at this point.
 
Shortly after Jobs died, there were people referring to Forstall as Apple's "CEO-in-waiting." There is spectulation that that may have been one of the reasons, if not the main reason, that Cook fired Forstall, even though the Apple Maps-related situation was the reason cited for the firing. By firing Forstall, Cook didn't have to worry about people sooner-or-later calling for Forstall to replace him as CEO.

The job of Apple’s CEO is, first and foremost, to understand what makes Apple, Apple. That is far more important than product sense, or operations excellence, or taste, or a million other attributes thrown around by pundits and analysts. On this criteria, it’s clear that Cook is the right man for the job. I would contend that anyone that says otherwise doesn’t understand revolutions, doesn’t understand culture, and doesn’t understand Apple.

Firing Scott Forstall was likely the best thing Tim Cook could have done for Apple.
 
Tim Cook has been in the seat for so long and made Apple the behemoth it is today. At the time of Steve Jobs passing Apple was valued at ~$340 Billion ($490B today) and is now ~3.75 Trillion. Cook announcing retirement would single handedly impact industry relations and the stock market...you don't do that on Good Morning America or announce it without board approval.

And what does that do for me as a consumer? I could care less about how much money bragging rights they have. When they continually put out lackluster products, broken software, and absolutely no drive for innovation…it means absolutely nothing what amount of money cook brought in. He’s obviously not spending any of it on making Apple better or leading.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: lotones
And what does that do for me as a consumer? I could care less about how much money bragging rights they have. When they continually put out lackluster products, broken software, and absolutely no drive for innovation…it means absolutely nothing what amount of money cook brought in. He’s obviously not spending any of it on making Apple better or leading.
As a consumer I would agree if they put out lackluster products, broken software and had absolutely no drive for innovation. But none of that is true in an objective sense.

There is a reason Apple had a record breaking earnings call and the Mac neo is seemingly is a big hit enough that it is written it could have a big impact on the windows market. That thing is called innovation along with giving the consumer the products they want.

A few here on MR got it all incorrect. Of course in the world of the internet, YMMV.
 
Tim Cook has been in the seat for so long and made Apple the behemoth it is today. At the time of Steve Jobs passing Apple was valued at ~$340 Billion ($490B today) and is now ~3.75 Trillion. Cook announcing retirement would single handedly impact industry relations and the stock market...you don't do that on Good Morning America or announce it without board approval.
What that does for me as a consumer is give me the products I want. This year Apple TV, iPad Pro m5 and MacBook NEO. All products I wanted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
This is the biggest fallacy. That Cook is holding up the stock price or holding the company together. He's at the head of the company, but the success is because of all the people that work underneath him. He's not some grand visionary or leader.
Thanks for the laugh.

As of 2022, Apple employs 164,000 people. Please tell the class which one of those 164k employees guided the company to a $3 trillion dollar value if it wasn't because of Tim's leadership.

Sure, each one of those 164,000 employees have contributed to Apple's success, but somebody needs to guide that ship and that is why Apple has over a billion repeat customers year after year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
As a consumer I would agree if they put out lackluster products, broken software and had absolutely no drive for innovation. But none of that is true in an objective sense.

There is a reason Apple had a record breaking earnings call and the Mac neo is seemingly is a big hit enough that it is written it could have a big impact on the windows market. That thing is called innovation along with giving the consumer the products they want.

A few here on MR got it all incorrect. Of course in the world of the internet, YMMV.

I forgot the Neo. The Neo is certainly an exception. Sadly, all of the other products have been rehashes for too long with just minor chip upgrades. The physical hardware has grown a bit long in the tooth
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I don’t think the board is rushing to get rid of him anytime soon (so any departure would likely be on Tim’s terms), and I won’t be surprised if he continues to stay on in some advisory role. For example, the new CEO might focus solely on internal company affairs, while Tim Cook continues to manage external and political matters concerning Apple.
No CEO worth anything wants to be half a CEO. Apple already tried crap like that with Gil and it ended badly. It’s fine that they push him to the board only handling board tasks.
 
I read the reason he was forced out was because the other executives couldn’t work with him. Apparently Jony Ive wouldn’t sit down in the same room with him unless Tim Cook was there.
It’s very hard to know what executives are like behind closed doors having worked with a literal psychopath whose public face was all nice and sweet and she was the biggest ******* to the staff.
 
It’s very hard to know what executives are like behind closed doors having worked with a literal psychopath whose public face was all nice and sweet and she was the biggest ******* to the staff.
Safe bet 99.9 percent of those at the top are not nice people whether its business or politics. You don't reach the top being a nice person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
I’m pretty sure the M1 MacBook Air is one of the best selling laptops of all time
That may be the case.... but look at the software situation for the platform as a whole. Not only does Apple still make zero effort to make the products suitable for gaming (which we saw Apple starting to turn around for a while there in the Jobs era, when Apple worked hand-in-hand with Blizzard to make sure "World of Warcraft" didn't do graphical things that broke OpenGL on the Mac), but the elimination of Intel compatibility going forward means many small developers just opted out of rewriting code for M series processors.

Especially for the customer looking at laptops like the Air? The huge battery life for the M series processor is what really sold the machines.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.