michaelant
macrumors 6502
What a sad day for MacRumors forums. Soon there'll be nothing to complain about.
Yep, just a bunch of arm chair quarterbacks that talk down on the accomplishments of others instead of doing something...I’ve noticed comments like this never mention what innovation should have come from Apple but didn’t because Tim Cook isn’t a visionary or is just interested in making lots of money or whatever. So what is it? And who’s doing it instead of Apple?
The iPod, iPhone, iPad were once in a generation (maybe once in a lifetime) new products. That's not going to happen everyday. The closest thing we have so far is the AVP, which is ironic, because most people around here seem to diss on it quite a bit, but the underlying technology is probably part of our technological future.It was a public company when steve was at the helm too.
Profit margins were much lower, but innovation was much higher. They were hitting it out of the park with new products on rapid fire, and investors were happy with that.
Betcha he’s gonna get a cushy position on the orange idiots administration
Yes, he actually said "I can't imagine a life without Apple" and since he stays on the board, he won't have to; pretty slick answer.Funny how these things were decided probably weeks if not months ago, yet Cook still played along.
Even China cellphone companies are more innovating than Apple nowadays. They both make cellphones.The iPod, iPhone, iPad were once in a generation (maybe once in a lifetime) new products. That's not going to happen everyday. The closest thing we have so far is the AVP, which is ironic, because most people around here seem to diss on it quite a bit, but the underlying technology is probably part of our technological future.
I want Apple to innovate and take risks, too, but what products do you suggest they innovate with next? Saying the innovation needs to be "higher" is easy but actually making a constructive suggestion is hard.
There's a lot of technology and electronics out there now, many more competitors than when Steve Jobs was around. Apple has to be responsible to shareholders while they try out new things. And it seems like they're already doing it with the AVP, with the Fold, the glasses, the MacBook Ultra, etc.
Yeah, hard to imagine CF and Eddie will stay on and take orders from a younger CEO.I imagine CF and a few others will soon retire (Eddy Cue etc), but I bet they’ve been given golden handcuffs to stay for a year or so after Cook hands over, to help keep the ship steady & give JT a chance to decide what kind of Apple he wants to build.
Some people just don't get it.Not a chance on that.
Finally!End of an Era
Ternus wasn't the guy that brought us Liquid Glass, that was Alan Dye, who has now left and is working at Meta. I agree with the snow leopard every other year thing. I've been saying that for a while too. If they absolutely must stick with an every year release, then they should do something like what Ubuntu does and have a long term support OS version and a new shiny version OS, then always drop hardware support on the Long Term Support release so they can both try to sell the ooh shiny with new hardware, and the old machines get active support longer.As a long time (1983) shareholder, Tim Cook has been awesome.
As a hardware user, letting Ivy go was his greatest achievement. Followed by the transition to apple silicon.
As a software user, i'm scared to death that the guy who oversaw liquid glass is now CEO
As someone who would like to have yet another apple toy to play with, I'm cautiously optimistic that we have a product guy leading apple.
Not that he's asking:
1) Every two years do a 'snow leopard' release across the board. In between actually hire regression testers.
2) Give us options: Let us turn off the lousy music in apple fitness+ and play our own. Let us design our own watch faces. Let us completely disable liquid glass and transparency. let us move the horrible music controls in apple music out of the way of the list of songs. Let us own our music and still download to our watch. Let us stream music to homepods AND appleTVs (because some of us have real sound systems), give us access to ALL our playlists in carplay, and so on.
3) Give siri a brain
4) Publish a hardware and software lifecycle
5) Real GPU's in Macs please. #nvidia
6) Stop with the mandatory ads - or give us 'ad-free' as part of Apple One #ensh*tt*f*cat*on is a real thing
7) Did I mention give siri a brain?
Because it was expected, this was already factored in.New CEO is a big deal. Apple stock barely moved. Up 1%.
Market seems OK with this.
Wanna bet?What a sad day for MacRumors forums. Soon there'll be nothing to complain about.
It’s called being a professional.Funny how these things were decided probably weeks if not months ago, yet Cook still played along.
Apple ships many more high-end units per year globally than Chinese OEMS. Harder to innovate when you're producing at that scale and volume for so many markets. You should have used Samsung as an example but then again: they're even more vertically integrated than Apple, making their own screens, etc., so perhaps innovating on display tech is easier for them and keeps Apple at a disadvantage.Even China cellphone companies are more innovating than Apple nowadays. They both make cellphones.
Ignoring? Having 1+ Billion happy customers IS the reason Apple has become a more conservative, “grown up” company. It’s not easy being innovative when a minor (yes, minor) change to the look of your UI makes a hundred million customers scream at you, and a product with 3 billion dollars in revenue is considered an embarrassment.Sadly, nothing will change here. After a couple months it will be the same "Wah... Apple doesn't innovate anymore."
Basically ignoring the 1+ Billion happy/repeat customers (the final arbiters of a company's success) who love Apple products and propelling the company to being one of the most successful consumer tech companies in the world.
He may, but according to reports it was his project.Ternus is totally going to kill the VisionPro.
Why?I was really expecting it to happen 1st April 2026 but since it will still happen in 2026, it's fine I guess.
1st January 2026 would have been the best date.
Ideology changing? How so an why should it?Party time!!!
🥳
Fantastic news.
It’s time for some fresh ideology, I hope.