Did the ones he had escape?Is Tim looking for any nephews to adopt?
Did the ones he had escape?Is Tim looking for any nephews to adopt?
lol. It's pretty easy to not be motivated by money when you're guaranteed to retire a billionaire. Tim Cook is no saint.I would say most, if not all, CEOs would not agree to this cut. Tim is clearly not motivated by money. He is the head of a $2T company, and considering his performance over the last 10 years, he should be well compensated.
More like 100-200, even more if they throw in Tim’s stock options.You can hire 50-100 solid engineers with his pay cut
It will come. Don't think for a moment that Tim Cook would be "allowed" (let's be honest) in office if his performance (profit) can't justify it...I agree with you 100%.
I love Tim Cook but it would be nice if someone else gets a chance to become the CEO of Apple. Someone who is not afraid of change, innovation and really enriching people's lives. Give others a chance!
I disagree. It seems the interdependence of the world's manufacturing process was in fact disrupted by the events of 2020 and 2021.No doubt there would be some impact, but the supply chain problems that Apple has were not created by the events of 2020 and 2021, those problems were already in place just waiting for something to bring them to the surface.
The world did not have a backup strategy. There is nothing to suggest, imo, that having a backup strategy would be any good when almost the entirety of the world was shut down.A supply chain wizard would have contingencies, TC didn't. He just took credit for the short-term gains that not preparing for contingencies provided.
It's easy to criticize, but the likely outcome would have been the same no matter where suppliers and assemblers were located.Diversifying component manufacturing definitely plays a part, but it doesn't matter if ALL the iPhone components are made outside of China if Apple still depends on China for a large portion of their iPhone assembly.
It's not short term, unless you define short term as 15 years.The short-term gain of cheap labor and the lack of labor rights/laws in China was too much for TC (and other tech companies) to resist.
They should, but in the meantime, the whole "Apple is a $2 trillion company" doesn't sound good when we compare it like that.He had a contract… board signed off on it. Based on it he helped make a lot of money for a lot of people. Given the optics and the economy (now and predictions) he is cool with reworking compensation to what feels more appropriate (for his position and the moment). This is consistent with Mr. Cook’s character and leadership. It’s petty to snark. How much relative to profitability did some other tech leaders make last year? Did they take a cut?
First really need not to use 'totem pole', please.As Mr. Tim Cook should! It starts from a top Leader on the totem pole.
And he’s allowed two 15-minute rest breaks and 30 minutes for lunch. 😂In a 40-hour work week (just for fun), that total compensation breaks down to around $48,000/hr.
Imagine!
First really need not to use 'totem pole', please.
Next ... this is just signaling ... he's not loosing ANY money at all, in fact ... he's doubly gaining MORE $$$$.
1. Lower annual pay rate means lower taxes! More to keep in his coffers.
2. Higher performance compensation - which Apple has a HUGE discount via current stock price purchasing, means a LOT more money coming into his coffers!! And tax differed until a MUCH lower cost when charged for such income taxes.
He's not allowed to combine his 30 minutes lunch and his two 15-min breaks into a single HOUR-long lunch.And he’s allowed two 15-minute rest breaks and 30 minutes for lunch. 😂
The problem is eggs are getting expensive.
How is Tim Cook going to pay for eggs 🥚 in California now?
View attachment 2141295
I’m worried. How is he going to afford the Apple Polishing Cloth?Oh my! How is he going to afford the iPhone 15??