Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Let's let people with disabilities enjoy their time in the spotlight here. These are great videos as are the short ones that were just published. People with disabilities are shown in a positive light doing jobs or activities many might think they can't do. Sorry if you have some flaming hatred for Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dwaltwhit
I somehow doubt that assessment, and I certainly doubt that macOS is in any way more advanced than Windows 10 especially in this specific problem domain. It would be interesting, though, to see a direct accessibility comparison of the two platforms side by side.

As a disabled person, who also works with other disabled people. I can assure you that your assumption is incorrect. Windows without added expensive software is unusable for me. Macs are usable out of the box. Depending on the model macs are cheaper than PCs for me.
 
Why does there have to be an "activist" brigade for everything?

Besides the obvious that was mentioned by another user, those without the disability won't understand the need without the "activist brigade" voices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porco
There's no subtitles on the video about hearing impaired and deaf users... which means I can't understand it.

Good one.

(Using Tapatalk)
All of these videos have CC toggle on the bottom just like any standard Youtube videos.
 
In the Tapatalk client they don't. Hopefully it's not YouTube automatic captions, which are terrible and usually just make matters worse.
 
and dropped the price by $50.

Glad we agree.

Apple has increased the base price of every category.

Hmmm, although I think you're disagreeing with yourself. o_O

All the items you mentioned are previous generation.

As you've suddenly added caveats, let's stick to your original arbitrary 5 year time frame and the latest tech:

- iPhone 5 2012 - $649 ($692 in 2017 adjusted for inflation)
- iPhone 7 2017 - $649

Pop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidmartindale
Go to http://www.aapd.com
(American Association of People with Disabilities)
Click on employment, which takes you to : http://jobs.aapd.com/jobs
Search for Apple jobs in CA
Find no jobs listed by Apple

Now you understand Apple does not really give a sh1z about the disabled, and just uses this garbage as part of their faux "we care" emotional marketing strategy. Period.
For a company that doesn't care about disabled people, they sure seem to spend a lot of time and money developing technology for and talking about those issues. In fact, Apple appears to be one of the few companies that puts their money where their mouth is when it comes to accessibility issues.
[doublepost=1495117516][/doublepost]
Sorry Tim, I'm not buying the Kool-Aid you're selling.

"we don't look at ROI", "we want to make Apple products accessible to everyone".

How about making it cheaper so everyone can afford it would be a good start!
I really wish that one of these interviewees would've questioned Tim on his idea of democratizing Apple products. He only gets those kind of questions from jaded analysts so it would be fascinating to see him squirm a little to justify Apple's pricing and strategies. It could be argued that Google is much more successful at democratizing technology to the world. Of course Google forces users to pay a different kind of "price" but if people with accessibility issues cannot afford Apple products, how is Apple really helping them?
 
Not enough attention is paid to color blindness industry-wide. But Apple's accessibility efforts are admirable overall.
 
[QUOTE="I really wish that one of these interviewees would've questioned Tim on his idea of democratizing Apple products. He only gets those kind of questions from jaded analysts so it would be fascinating to see him squirm a little to justify Apple's pricing and strategies. It could be argued that Google is much more successful at democratizing technology to the world. Of course Google forces users to pay a different kind of "price" but if people with accessibility issues cannot afford Apple products, how is Apple really helping them?[/QUOTE]

There is no doubt that some people are being shut out. However, the price of assistive technology has been so much more expensive than an iPhone and an iPad. When you have an app that takes the place of an assistive device, that almost always results in a more affordable solution.
 
There's no subtitles on the video about hearing impaired and deaf users... which means I can't understand it.

Good one.

(Using Tapatalk)

It was captioned when I watched it last night via Rikki's Facebook page... Weird.
 
In the Tapatalk client they don't. Hopefully it's not YouTube automatic captions, which are terrible and usually just make matters worse.
Instead of complaining about what might be, why not just check it out yourself? You could have saved yourself the post.

So many people eager to complain and criticize EVERYTHING but too ______ (lazy?) to do any real verification themselves. Come on friends, check before posting.
 
Of all posts that deserve a dislike button, this one deserves a dislike button
I'll just have to settle for liking yours.
[doublepost=1495121843][/doublepost]
Apple employs people with disabilities. Hell, they had a blind engineer on stage at WWDC a few years ago demoing the Accessibility features he helped build.

But they're not on some list so their work in this area is worthless. /s



I know right. I have a printer that needs a laptop with a SCSI port. Stupid Apple abandoning standards. /s



He's a CEO, this is work.

And judging by customer satisfaction and their stock price they are as great as they've ever been.



&


Running a business 101, make profit. See the majority of Android handset manufacturers who are in a race to the bottom, they're in a world of hurt because they're terribly run businesses that can't make any money.

If you can't turn a profit you can't reinvest for the future. If the original iMac and iPods were dirt cheap where would the money have come to develop the iPhone? Steve understood this and so does Tim (thankfully). I'm just glad the average MacRumors member doesn't run Apple they would blast through the cash pile and bankrupt the company.



Apple Watch (with the S1), iPad (now starts $329), iPhone (starts at $399 with the SE). Your facts are wrong buddy, sorry to burst your bubble.



Source?



Hopefully he would direct them to this support article: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT207258



Sorry either you're uninformed with the history of Apple and tech in general or are trolling. I imagine you weren't around in the eighties when the Lisa launched for almost $10k.

Over the years Apple's entry level prices have steadily dropped putting them in reach of a wider group of people.

- Original PowerBook 1991 = $2300 ($4,129 in 2017 with inflation)
- Original entry level 15" MBP in 2006 = $1999 ($2426 with inflation)
- 2016 entry level 15" MBP = $2399 in 2017

- Original iPhone 4GB = $499 on contract ($588 in 2017 with inflation)
- Entry level iPhone SE in 2017 = $399 handset only in 2017

You are the hero we need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t.portis
I have light sensitivity and would like to see the anti glare screens make a return. I'm still using a 2012 cMBP which will likely be my last mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porco
However, the price of assistive technology has been so much more expensive than an iPhone and an iPad. When you have an app that takes the place of an assistive device, that almost always results in a more affordable solution.

This in spades ^^^

I am hearing impaired. Burdened by the stratospheric cost of archaic hearing aids. My savior is always closed captions. This because the world has turned into video documents without closed captions, rather than the written word.

Here hoping that, in the near future, iOS/MacOS will include:
  1. accurate speech-to-text parsing
  2. speech captured remotely off its microphone
  3. accuracy of parsing honed-in by machine learning/adaptation, and
  4. text captions projected onto either a native display, or onto a colocated Apple Glass/Watch.
Either way, to make hearing aids and their prohibitive cost, a thing of the past.
 
In the Tapatalk client they don't. Hopefully it's not YouTube automatic captions, which are terrible and usually just make matters worse.

So... Tapatalk (not an Apple product) scrapes/interprets the YouTube web site (not an Apple product), and somehow, that's Apple's fault?

Yes, the CC icon is there on the YouTube interface. I turned CC on, and read the captioning while listening to one of the interviews. If that's YouTube's automatic captioning, it's phenomenally good - not a single "uhhh," or "ummm," no repeated words/stammers, "I I mean..." no misspellings of homonyms, no misinterpretation of words spoken - nothing like the automated captioning I've seen. Operating on the theory that there was indeed human intervention, to the captioner's credit there are no corrections to grammar, no "editorial" fixes; what I'd consider a purely technical clean-up. It seems incredibly likely that Apple delivered pre-captioned videos to YouTube.

But of course, Apple must still have done something wrong, right?

The plain truth is that companies like Apple are careful to caption every video they deliver to the public, for whatever purpose. It's to their benefit to control the delivery of their message. Captioning is not only used by those with hearing impairments; it's turned on in all sorts of noisy public environments like airports, bars, Times Square video displays, and Apple Retail Stores. Captioning is as much a part of modern video/film production as makeup, lighting, and set decoration. If they fail to caption, it's not a sign of being insensitive to the hearing impaired, it's flat out stupidity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesRath
He should to talking to a blind person about how they experience the touch bar/function keys on a new MBP...
Hi, that blind person here. I can answer that I was skeptical about the Touchbar at first but I actually made a video about some of the accessibility around the Touchbar

There's also some neat VoiceOver commands/gestures that can make navigation on macOS even more seamless.
[doublepost=1495125754][/doublepost]
Go to http://www.aapd.com
(American Association of People with Disabilities)
Click on employment, which takes you to : http://jobs.aapd.com/jobs
Search for Apple jobs in CA
Find no jobs listed by Apple

Now you understand Apple does not really give a sh1z about the disabled, and just uses this garbage as part of their faux "we care" emotional marketing strategy. Period.

Apple retails hires more people with disabilities than I've seen anyone else do in the tech space. I know many friends within my community who work as Geniuses, Specialists, Creatives, and even Managers(Leaders). These same people are blind, deaf, autistic, wheel-chair users, service/guide dog users, etc. I know at least 14 people with disabilities personally, and have met even more briefly. During my trip at corporate this past week, there wasn't anything different. Many people with disabilities are employed by Apple from contractors, to corporate employees. Just because they're not listed on a website doesn't mean you can speak for many of us and who employs us. Every person featured with a disability in Apple's ads are people with disabilities in the entertainment industry, a place often overshadowed by able-bodied actors taking roles from PWDs and playing disabled characters themselves. Hope that sheds some light on the facts.
 
Why does there have to be an "activist" brigade for everything?

I'm disabled. Deaf and physically disabled. We've been put down and marginalized for centuries - only because of that "activist brigade" have we been able to contribute to the best of our abilities.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does there have to be an "activist" brigade for everything?

Because people advocate for their self-interest, regardless of what that interest may be. Someone advocating free markets and minimal taxation is as much an activist as someone advocating a communist state. When we look beyond self-interest, we find people advocating for issues they believe aren't getting the attention they deserve. Advocates for the poor, the enslaved, the wealthy, the free, a clean environment, the freedom to leave a mess...
 
How about peoples who can only interact with a computer via SD Card ? Or those with the disability of not being able to ever adapt to another keyboard key travel ? And those with a violent allergy to USB C to USB A adapters ?
Facts
[doublepost=1495131831][/doublepost]I am a blind apple user. I have the new MacBook Pro with touch bar. And, I have an iPhone 7. No complaints
[doublepost=1495131945][/doublepost]
given the new MacBook Pro is a Tim product, would have been nice to see these "activists" opinion on the Touch bar. From my research the accessibility feedback is not great.
I am a blind apple user, and I have the new MacBook Pro with touch bar. I use voice over, and the touch bar works fine with it. So I have no idea what your talking about
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.