Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Agreed. Any bollards or other protection would likely be the responsibility of the shopping center, not any one individual storefront within it.
Apple would have a lot of sway if they wanted to see them installed. They were installed immediately after this incident, but I'm not sure if it was Apple or the property taking the initiative. The speed this vehicle was traveling at would have exceeded what most bollards are rated for. It may have helped, but the car would probably have flipped over it and gone in to the store either way.
 
Last edited:
I'm very suspicious. 70-80MPH in a parking lot. Foot "stuck" on pedal. Brakes not working.

Something was definitely not right in that situation.
I accidentally misquoted that. It was visually estimated at 60-70 MPH. Still fast and this is still a vehicle with a brake override system. If the accelerator was stuck for any reason the brake would still work. The brake would override the accelerator and the vehicle would fully stop. The story is definitely fishy unless they managed to get both the brake stuck up and the accelerator stuck down. I'm trying to imagine them with a sideways foot on the accelerator and under the brake pedal, but not sure if that is even possible. It doesn't sound like the brake also stuck was the case based on the testimony released.

It is also a possible suicide attempt by vehicle since the driver was recently unemployed and divorced. He used to work in software sales, so it could have been targeted even though nothing linked him to that store. It is a pretty safe vehicle for the driver if this was the plan, but to me this is more probable then the brake override system failing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I'm very suspicious. 70-80MPH in a parking lot. Foot "stuck" on pedal. Brakes not working.

Something was definitely not right in that situation.
Right. To get to 70-80 mph in a RAV4 you have to be very deliberate about that. It also takes 8 secs to get up to 60 mph while mashing the accelerator. Who goes full throttle through a parking lot??? And the chance that the accelerator got “stuck” is minuscule after the $1.8B lawsuit that Toyota settled for this exact problem and implemented safety features like the aforementioned brake override. It doesn’t make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Great on Tim visiting the victims. Rein was extremely reckless and should spend years in jail. The evidence against him is overwhelming and his lawyer should convince him to plead guilty and beg for a light sentence.

I wonder if he failed to wear necessary glasses while driving in an unfamiliar area. He claims no medical conditions, no drug or alcohol usage and mechanical problems with his vehicle (although he claimed an earlier instance of getting his foot stuck while using the SUV).
 
I remember from previous investigations of unexpected acceleration, people get confused and think their foot is on the brake while it is actually on the accelerator.
It doesn't seem likely in this situation. They said their foot was stuck and were trying to stop with their left foot. Maybe they could have had their foot stuck mostly to the right of the accelerator and were mashing down on the rest of the accelerator with their other foot to stop. We're not accustomed to hitting the brake with our left foot. Would need a RAV4 owner to chime in if that were possible in this vehicle. Generally the accelerator has a wall to the right of it to make it easier to find and prevent this sort of thing.

Of course if they were thinking straight they would have popped it in to neutral if the brake didn't work. It still feels crazy that they would have steered in to the Apple Store with so many other things they could have steered in to. I don't see how the Apple Store could have been a straight line from them. They claimed to be at the mall to fix their eyeglasses, so I wonder if their sight was impaired.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I don't see where it was deliberate. Accidents happen.
I would venture to say you may hear something to this affect " driver was seen making several turns accelerating prior to the long parking aisle where it is estimated by the investigation team reaching a speed of 64 mph just prior to crashing into the apple store. There was no sign of breaking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
YES they do. They decided against the barriers because of aesthetics - they have culpability.

They failed to provide a safe area where people can shop. As you said, cars are complex, and knowing that there is a history of cars driving into store fronts they have a duty to ensure it doesn't happen. They chose not too, and funnily enough, those barriers automagically appeared in the front of that apple store - go figure ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The city, building manager or Apple decided against it?
 
It has not yet been determined if this was a deliberate act or not.

The driver claimed his foot was stuck on the throttle, but that explanation is suspicious. The fire marshal told a few news sources he thought it was deliberate based on video footage. The driver claimed they were hitting the brake and it wasn’t working, but a RAV4 from the last 10 years would have cut the throttle if the brake was applied since it has a brake override system. The brake override clearly would have worked at the 70-80 MPH the car was reportedly traveling.

We need to wait for the investigation.
It was a 4 runner not a rav4. And no, the 4 runner had not been updated since 2008 and yes, it was obvi deliberate.
 
It was a 4 runner not a rav4. And no, the 4 runner had not been updated since 2008 and yes, it was obvi deliberate.
The initial news reports said it was a 2019 Toyota RAV4. Looks like it has since been edited to say it is a 2019 Toyota 4Runner. Either way, this vehicle also has the same braking system that cuts the throttle. All models back to 2011 have this and I think some before that through recalls. That includes models that didn't receive a substantial refresh since 2008. Checking some Toyota 4Runner forums, it looks like this vehicle transitioned part way in the 2010 model year. Toyota was burned by stuck accelerators and they incorporated this everywhere pretty quickly. Toyota vehicles have been drive-by-wire for a long time, so this was mainly a software change.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bruinsrme
The police report said it was a 2019 RAV4...
This is not a Rav4.
Screenshot 2022-11-28 at 2.43.38 PM.png
Photo for comparison
2019-toyota-4runner-trd-off-road-review.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4nNtt
Good catch. I was basing it on the initial reporting that said RAV4. Either way, this vehicle has the same braking feature that disables the throttle.
I didn't know either. just found the photo through the linked news article.

If it was a 2019, it did have Toyota Safety Sense as standard, but earlier ones do not. Who knows why it didn't kick in.
 
I didn't know either. just found the photo through the linked news article.

If it was a 2019, it did have Toyota Safety Sense as standard, but earlier ones do not. Who knows why it didn't kick in.
Good question. I don't know enough about that feature, but it feels it should have auto-braked. I don't know if the window would have confused it. Maybe it did brake once inside the store.
 
I would venture to say you may hear something to this affect " driver was seen making several turns accelerating prior to the long parking aisle where it is estimated by the investigation team reaching a speed of 64 mph just prior to crashing into the apple store. There was no sign of breaking.

Where did you find that?

The initial narrative report supporting probable cause for charges did not contain any estimate of speed by the investigating team. The only estimate was a witness who visually estimated the speed at 60 mph. That estimate is very unreliable.

There was no mention of braking but physical evidence from the photograph doesn’t indicate any locked wheel or impending skids.

The accident investigation team can do the calculations to determine an estimated minimum speed but haven’t seen the traffic collision report released yet. That might take a few days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
Where did you find that?

The initial narrative report supporting probable cause for charges did not contain any estimate of speed by the investigating team. The only estimate was a witness who visually estimated the speed at 60 mph. That estimate is very unreliable.

There was no mention of braking but physical evidence from the photograph doesn’t indicate any locked wheel or impending skids.

The accident investigation team can do the calculations to determine an estimated minimum speed but haven’t seen the traffic collision report released yet. That might take a few days.
A fire marshal estimated the speed at 60-70 MPH based on video footage he saw. It was the same one that said it looked deliberate. It is true this is just a visual estimate and likely inaccurate. It still indicates a pretty high speed collision. I can't remember which news story had that quote. I was only able to find partial quotes doing a quick search for it. Witnesses also said they estimated the vehicle was traveling 60 MPH. It was driving along the front of the stores then turned left in to the Apple Store.
 
Last edited:
The fire marshal estimated the speed at 60-70 MPH based on video footage he saw. It is true this is just a visual estimate and likely inaccurate. It still indicates a pretty high speed collision.

Ahh. Agree with you. Thank you.
 
Where did you find that?

The initial narrative report supporting probable cause for charges did not contain any estimate of speed by the investigating team. The only estimate was a witness who visually estimated the speed at 60 mph. That estimate is very unreliable.

There was no mention of braking but physical evidence from the photograph doesn’t indicate any locked wheel or impending skids.

The accident investigation team can do the calculations to determine an estimated minimum speed but haven’t seen the traffic collision report released yet. That might take a few days.
I simply speculation ;) "I would venture to say you may hear something to this affect"

Estimated? It doesn't take a few days to review video and calculate a speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnappleRumors
I simply speculation ;) "I would venture to say you may hear something to this affect"

Estimated? It doesn't take a few days to review video and calculate a speed.

It takes a few days to prepare the crash report (including speed calcs, if they do them) and clear review before it will be released to the press.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.