Privacy never existed, google knows more about you then you do, privacy is non existent
overstated.Privacy never existed, google knows more about you then you do, privacy is non existent
Think they can. Anyway it’s moot because the ruling was apple should be able to collect fees on in app purchases even if from an outside link.
Everything else is a distant second.
False idea. Privacy is by default. All these companies are making the narrative that made it seem like you don't have any privacy so you don't think it's valuable, and thus you will be more willing to sacrifice it just to get free stuff.Privacy never existed, google knows more about you then you do, privacy is non existent
Better trust none of them!Who do I trust most? Apple or Google?
"We're Focused on Maintaining Privacy and Security of the App Store"
This is double speak from the ministry of truth (1984) that we will scan your files and share them with 3rd parties.
Here hoping for an open source competitor
You can buy Kindle books through the iOS Kindle app? I used to get a message telling me that a Kindle book wasn’t available that way. I’ve purchased all my Kindle books from Amazon’s website through Safari. I haven’t purchased a Kindle book in a while, though, so I haven’t tried using the Kindle app for a purchase. In this case, anyway, you do have another option to buy a Kindle book without giving Apple a cut.I like Apple, heck I've spent many thousands of pounds with them over the years, but I resent the fact that they should get a cut if I buy a Kindle book and just happen to be using the IOS Kindle app, should Amazon give Microsoft a cut if you're using the desktop Kindle app?
This is why I don’t understand the “Apple has a monopoly“ argument. If Apple somehow owned the patent on the concept of “smartphone,” and all other companies had to make early-2000s-style flip phones, and thus the App Store on iOS on iPhones were the only platform for third-party apps as we know them, then, yeah, I’d agree that Apple has a monopoly. Does Apple care about profit? Heck, yes. Are they 100% consistent in their stance on privacy (e.g., scanning your photos)? No. But does any other company come as close as they do when it comes to protecting your privacy? Not that I’m aware of. If app developers are unhappy with Apple’s policies, they have a choice to stop selling their apps on Apple devices and be Android-only. If enough developers did that, then Apple might decide to change their policies. That’s the free market in action. I’m not happy about everything Apple say and does, but, for me, they’re the best option available.Apple operating system, App Store , hardware are only on Apple’s devices. So Apple don’t dike other brands. Apple is the only developer of iPhone. No one force developers to create apps for iPhone , and developers don’t have any innate right to be on iPhone. They can be there and create great apps and to make money though Apple’s products and its intellectual property , only if they respect Apple rules and cost. Apple offer the best quality about privacy and security. People now have freedom to choice between Apple’s devices and other brands : I mean between products with different characteristic. If Apple would force to become a some kind of android , then all products would become ugual with no real differences. Apple and their clients don’t want that. And Apple have right to decide about their products. Their products are the most loved on the market by people. So let Apple be Apple! Thanks we have this brand in the world.
Privacy and Security are codes words for Profit and Control.I think Tim Cook should no longer be able to use the word “privacy.”