Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Attaching a debugger to a process is likely impossible but I don't see any reason you couldn't port the editor and compiler across.
If you're able to attach a debugger to a running process, from Xcode on a Mac, I think it's safe to say you could do it on the device itself.
 
Has Intel not updated any of the processors in the Pro/mini since then? Also, there is more than just Intel products in these machines. Hold Apple accountable for it, it's not just Intel's fault.
Jan 2017 and not aligned with a typical Apple update cycle. We'll see. It is core7 pin compatible. 35 W or 91W TDP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake
 
Was he not going to move in at any point?
Probably.

Steve Jobs was the original pitchman of Apple Campus 2 to the City of Cupertino. At the time, Tim Cook was COO, the daily operations man, so it was likely at that time that he would have been expected to stay at Infinite Loop.

Remember that Infinite Loop is still a very important campus and remains very close to Apple's heart. Apple's offices from their early days were in this area; for a long time they were on Mariani Avenue. Many if not all of the administrative divisions will stay at Infinite Loop: finance, legal, marketing, etc.

It is probable that there will be some hoteling offices at both locations, so executives have a private place to work when they are not at their home campus.
 
Last edited:
I just like how the article states that Steve Jobs conceived the design the same year he presented it - in significant detail - to the city council. Steve was certainly an exceptional individual, but I'm pretty sure I've read something about them buying the land and planning the campus back in 2005 or 2007. In fact, I think he states that to the city council.

Will have to watch again sometime...
 
For all of those saying this isn't a surprise, it actually is, Apple had previously stated that executive leadership would stay in Infinite Loop.

Cook will almost certainly keep an office at Infinite Loop if core leadership stays so it will be interesting if Cook's office at Apple Park will be more symbolic or if more of the leadership has decided to move to Apple Park as well.
 
You're right, Apple did previously say that executive team would remain at Infinite Loop. The three engineering VPs would be the ones most likely to move to Apple Park. I presume Ive will move the the R&D complex.

Bob Mansfield, no longer listed on the executive team webpage on Apple's website, would also likely move to Apple Park, either the main building or maybe the R&D complex.

If Tim starts holding his executive staff meetings at Apple Park, then he has moved. If he continues to return to Infinite Loop to hold them meetings there, then the Apple Park office is only figurative.

There is one real indicator where he is really based: where is his executive assistant's desk?

Same with all of the other VPs. Where are their EAs' desks?
 
Tim - No, no, please I will just stay in this "old" tech office instead of the new crazy looking city in a spaceship where I will have more sqft. in my office than most peoples homes (not to mention I am sure his own escape pod built in somewhere near his office in case he wants to go into space without the entire ship).

yeah right... Of course he is moving to the latest and greatest the company just dropped a grip on
 
No offense to Juli, but how is this even considered news? o_O

Breaking: man moves into house he purchases

Am I missing something?

Every article creates page views, which translates into ad revenue. If another publication announced this, MacRumors would have missed this opportunity. It's up to the reader to decide if it's worth their time or not.
 
Why would he? I get that Apple Park is all shiny and new but Apple's executive suites at Infinite Loop are almost certainly some of the nicest in the world and frequently refurbished.

Plus the leadership is probably more old school as far as executive suites, boardrooms and layout than the more open plan of the old campus.

Plus Apple already said that leadership would stay at Infinite Loop and that Apple Park was designed to replace the gazillion satellite offices they have, not Infinite Loop. If they were intending on moving leadership to Park they probably would have built a separate building.
 
I didn't know it did. I just hit the reply button and on my end, it shows up as a little snippet inside a box that has to be manually expanded if you want to see it all.
A box that contains the entirety of the article. Go look at how your comment appears on the main page for the article. Instead of clicking reply on the article, simply scroll down to the bottom of the forum page (the place where you naturally end up after reading the prior replies) and type your reply in the box that says, "Write your reply..." in it.
 
Aside from your flippant remark,

Those thousands of employees are not at executive level. They're employees that are based and scattered throughout the company, where they have their own specific section where they work in a cubicle or slotted area for what ever Department they work in.

Executive level or supervisory position typically has an office Of their own, where they have dozens, if not hundreds of employees underneath them. So why would that equate to them having their own office? That doesn't make sense.

Because they have offices today. Moving to the park benches means thousands of people giving up the quiet and privacy of an office with a door.

I love how many people talk about Apple as though they have any idea what goes on within its walls.
 
I love how many people talk about Apple as though they have any idea what goes on within its walls.

And you do? I didn't think so. And if you did, you wouldn't be subjecting your opinion on something if you had knowledge on it to begin with.

Should the hundreds of thousands of forum members on this site have a serious inclination of what "Goes on inside Apple's walls?" That's not even a valid argument or point to be made. Of course we don't. It's all speculation and opinions. That's what discussions are for. Your opinion holds no value over anyone else's. I love it when other forum members make assessments they have no evidence supporting what your claiming.
 
And you do? I didn't think so. And if you did, you wouldn't be subjecting your opinion on something if you had knowledge on it to begin with.

Should the hundreds of thousands of forum members on this site have a serious inclination of what "Goes on inside Apple's walls?" That's not even a valid argument or point to be made. Of course we don't. It's all speculation and opinions. That's what discussions are for. Your opinion holds no value over anyone else's. I love it when other forum members make assessments they have no evidence supporting what your claiming.

Are you guys seriously arguing over seating plans at Apple Park / Infinite Loop and the surrounding sites that Apple leases?
 
Apple skipped an entire generation of Intel processors. That's squarely on Apple.

Not to mention how far behind those GPUs are compared to current state. Or the now quaint TB2 ports speeds.

And yet they continue to sell the original trashcan Mac Pros, unmodified and woefully underpowered, as if desktop/workstation technology was locked in amber...
 
A box that contains the entirety of the article. Go look at how your comment appears on the main page for the article. Instead of clicking reply on the article, simply scroll down to the bottom of the forum page (the place where you naturally end up after reading the prior replies) and type your reply in the box that says, "Write your reply..." in it.


Ok. I didn't know it did that. I fixed it, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.