Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just listened to the latest Gruber podcast (The Talk Show) and he says that he heard (admittedly, he was not able to verify) that Apple did an internal investigation of the issue and found out that a certain alloy used in production - a metal part of the key - was not up to specifications and that it was prone to bending (a very small amount would do) that made the key much more succeptable to dirt than originally designed. They started using a new, more rigid type of alloy (newly manufactured keyboards) that reduced the failure rate significantly.

Of course, this is just "a guy I know heard from a guy he knows" thing. And also, a lot of people here would claim Apple is lying even if they gave all the details officially - so make of this what you will. However, this does seem like a plausible scenario.

1. Apple tests their products rigorously and they certainly didn't design this keyboard to give them all this trouble. If anyone thinks Apple knew this keyboard would fail but were like 'ah, **** it, just go with it' - you need to think harder. Just look at all the money they are loosing (even before the repair program). I have already said and I still believe the issue is NOT in the design, but in the manufacturing process. I'm sure Apple prototypes created by the design team were working fine.
2. Anyone who knows how things are manufactured at scale, knows that the production process gets tweaked during the product's life cycle. Machines change a bit, production gets optimized, materials sometimes change. An iPhone made in the first week and in the last week of its run are not identical - they are the same to the naked eye, but certain materials may be slighlty different, the production can be tweaked, etc. For example, supposedly Apple did some minor tweaks to iPhone 6 models after that "bendgate" started, even before they changed things with the 6S (and even then, it was mostly a material change as far as I know).
3. iFixit and people opening up their machines can't know the whole picture just by examining at the parts. Some changes are not perceivable.
4. A lot of people feel that the newer keyboards feel softer, which is in line with a more rigid metal part inside.
5. Keyboard repairs have dropped according to certain sources (as reported by Macrumors)
6. You can bet your ass Apple is doing something about this. How effective their changes are remains to be seen, but they certainly tweaked something, especially now since they offer the repair program. When all this started, I suspected that if they tweak anything, it will either be a full redesign, or a material change. It seems it's the latter. I don't expect this type of keyboard to go anywhere soon.

It's a design issue, a single grain of sand can **** the key.

https://www.extremetech.com/computi...s-vulnerable-to-single-grain-of-sand-analysis
 
Wonder how many of these don’t get free replacement with uninformed consumers. It’s not like Apple sends out emails telling consumers.
 
FWIW, I just got the top case of my 2017 MBP replaced (along with keyboard) and so far the difference between "original" and new keyboard is noticeable... it feels sturdier and more responsive. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually changed some material.
Would not make real sense to install more faulty keyboards but trying to fend off lawsuits.
I’m sure Apple does not want to have major keyboard redesign for next rev or thicker chassis.
 
Wonder how many of these don’t get free replacement with uninformed consumers. It’s not like Apple sends out emails telling consumers.

This isn't a recall, it's a warranty extension for a specific issue.
[doublepost=1530832781][/doublepost]
FWIW, I just got the top case of my 2017 MBP replaced (along with keyboard) and so far the difference between "original" and new keyboard is noticeable... it feels sturdier and more responsive. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually changed some material.

I replaced mine last week for my late 2016 nTB and don't feel there is a difference that would confirm a design change.

I had 2 late 2016 nTBs in my possession bought weeks apart (both in Dec 2016), one was bought for personal use while one was given to me by my employer. They had a difference in feel between them that I believe was more dramatic than the replacement I just got - granted I had 5 days of downtime, but I spent a year and a half on this machine (1100 battery cycles) and I type approx 100 wpm. The personally bought one had a much softer and quieter key action. There is of course a distinct feel to the action which differentiates a gen I vs. gen II butterfly board, but the firmness and loudness certainly varies. Just go to an Apple store and type on a bunch of machines.

This has pretty much been a constant for Apple keyboards since moving to the chiclets - the feel can vary quite a bit from unit to unit. I think what people are mostly feeling are variations from manufacture tolerances (ie. when such-and-such machine was last calibrated) to being produced by different suppliers. Batch to batch variations.
 
Last edited:
This has pretty much been a constant for Apple keyboards since moving to the chiclets - the feel can vary quite a bit from unit to unit. I think what people are mostly feeling are variations from manufacture tolerances (ie. when such-and-such machine was last calibrated) to being produced by different suppliers. Batch to batch variations.

There is certainly a slight difference in feel between 2016 and 2017 models, tolerances and variations or not. But even if there weren't, that wouldn't necessarily mean that there was no change in materials.
 
There is certainly a slight difference in feel between 2016 and 2017 models, tolerances and variations or not. But even if there weren't, that wouldn't necessarily mean that there was no change in materials.
Many people swear there's a change, and there seems to be some anecdotal evidence to support a slight change to the mechanism.
 
I replaced mine last week for my late 2016 nTB and don't feel there is a difference that would confirm a design change.

Unlikely a design change, but very likely some material change that makes the keys feel sturdier and more responsive...
 
You’ll find out eventually if that’s true, one way or another.

Personally, I lean towards calling BS, because somebody, somewhere within Apple would have likely leaked some sort of internal document that announced such a thing. I suspect that it’s a rumour that’s going around within Apple, intentional or not. Anyway, even with that theory, time will also tell.

The problem is it might take a few months to find out.
 
There is certainly a slight difference in feel between 2016 and 2017 models, tolerances and variations or not. But even if there weren't, that wouldn't necessarily mean that there was no change in materials.

Again, based on my own experience I'm certain I found more variation between two like units than between a topcase manufactured in late 2016 and one in early 2018. I'm confident a double-blind test would show I'm correct here w/ a variety of participants. That alot of people claim there is one is basic human nature, being hopeful that something has been mitigated in the face of a recurring problem.

Of course that doesn't confirm there wasn't a change on Apple's part, I'm just saying going by feel it's inconclusive. And the change could very well lend itself to a slight difference in feel, but that difference is within the same order of magnitude as typical tolerance variations.
[doublepost=1530882999][/doublepost]
Unlikely a design change, but very likely some material change that makes the keys feel sturdier and more responsive...

There could very well be a change to material used, but I'm not getting a sensation of the keys feeling sturdier and more responsive.
 
Last edited:
There could very well be a change to material used, but I'm not getting a sensation of the keys feeling sturdier and more responsive.

Ya know... it'd be nice if Apple actually gave us some details about this whole thing. A little transparency.

It took them a long time to even admit there was a problem. And now they offer this repair program... but they can't even say if they made a better keyboard... or if they are replacing your faulty keyboard with the same faulty keyboard.

The comments range from "I think it feels different" to other people saying "I think it feels the same"

Again... it's cool that they are offering free repairs. But it'll suck if every 6 months you have to lose your laptop for a few days because of a piece of dust! :p
 
Ya know... it'd be nice if Apple actually gave us some details about this whole thing. A little transparency.

It took them a long time to even admit there was a problem. And now they offer this repair program... but they can't even say if they made a better keyboard... or if they are replacing your faulty keyboard with the same faulty keyboard.

It would be nice, but the most economical option is to keep the info here as close to their chest as possible. If they admit to a defect and stats on the actual % of affected machines and their efforts on a revision to address, then that gives litigation efforts fuel to a proper recall which would be far more expensive than handling verifiable warranty claims.

The differential between the two approaches is probably in excess of a billion dollars. Is the hit to the brand by being less transparent about the manner worth that cost? Macs represent a tiny portion of their revenue, attention, and likely brand equity nowadays.

IMO a 4 year warranty to a questionably designed part (yes, perhaps the most important part) is a reasonable solution. For my 12/16 purchased laptop that gives Apple until 12/20 to have a fix. While I don't believe there is a fix in the wild right now (ie. if the latest keyboards are a more stable V2 it's not an actual design fix, just a mitigation) I do have faith Apple will have one in the next 2.5 years. It sucks to be without your machine for 5'ish days every time though.
 
And they did. I am living proof. I am typing this on a 2010 MBP 17" that I purchased new 8 years ago. Zero issues.
I agree. My 2010 MBP 15" has the best keyboard I've ever typed on. Crisp and responsive. And after eight years, zero issues. It can be done, folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baypharm
Of course it can be done. Now all of the sudden crappy keyboards which fail after a few months are the new normal.

Does anybody remember any keyboard from any manufacturer, which would fail in such a spectacular manner (crippled by a spec of dust) as the new Apple's keyboards 2015-2018? No? These machines should be pulled back in the same way as Note 7 was and customers given their money back. This is such a spectacular fail that it amazes me how people can still be saying 4 years extended warranty is a great deal.
 
If this is a claim from Apple Support, they have likely assumed it without confirmation, or are just saying it to reassure you.
What they told you about the 2017 model wasn't true but it was slightly altered and supposedly less likely to experience some of the issues but not all of them.

It is possible that they have altered the design for this program (that would be the somewhat logical approach). They are unlikely to start replacing it with the yet to be unveiled 2018 keyboard for a number of reasons, so the keyboard should be changed. But we won't know this until somebody actually looks at the mechanism rather than just saying 'it feels the same'.

Despite all of this, nobody, not even iFixit, has bothered to tear it down and examine it to check.
Nobody's even tested it properly, I would have thought that given the lawsuits, it would have happened by now.
 
Macs represent a tiny portion of their revenue, attention, and likely brand equity nowadays.

$18-20 billion in revenue is not a tiny amount. And is not a sum shareholders would want to see shrink either in real terms or as a percentage of Apples overall revenue.
 
Of course it can be done. Now all of the sudden crappy keyboards which fail after a few months are the new normal.

Does anybody remember any keyboard from any manufacturer, which would fail in such a spectacular manner (crippled by a spec of dust) as the new Apple's keyboards 2015-2018? No? These machines should be pulled back in the same way as Note 7 was and customers given their money back. This is such a spectacular fail that it amazes me how people can still be saying 4 years extended warranty is a great deal.

Could not agree more. If there are people saying that customers should be happy that we can go back to an apple store and have the keyboards replaced every few months every time it fails for 4 years, then I dare say why don't you do that yourselves.
 
$18-20 billion in revenue is not a tiny amount. And is not a sum shareholders would want to see shrink either in real terms or as a percentage of Apples overall revenue.

It's all relative, and that's a small portion of their revenue. Just look at the Buyer's Guide for Macs on this site - almost every line has been neglected... Macbook, Macbook Air, Macbook Pro, and iMac are all in a "don't buy" status.

Dollars invested in R&D and support for iOS devices yield a much higher return for the company. I gather that's what shareholders would want Apple to focus on. The Macs are part of an ecosystem that needs to be healthy though so too much neglect is short term thinking.

Years ago I was the lead engineer on a product line that made $30M a year. But I only worked on it part time and had trouble securing other engineers for feature pushes. Why? Because the majority of our team was focused on another project that did $200M. The only reason we got things out the door was because some of our largest customers on the major product really liked it and it was an embarrassment if too neglected, the $30M revenue was considered something more of a loss leader, even though to make that $30M we only expended maybe $5M. It was a 'lossly' gain because of the opportunity cost from not focusing resources on something more profitable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smirking
That all true in the short run.

But as far as I know, XCode doesn't run on Windows. If they do make it run on Windows, that will truly be the end of Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haydn!
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.