Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Doesn't mean selling 4+ year old hardware for the same price is fair to consumers.

I understand the fixed prices for the iOS devices, but those are usually updated every year, but some of the Macs have lingered for years without underlying architecture & technology upgrades, sometimes only getting a minor spec bump but basic price stays the same.
I didn't say it was fair, its just what they have always done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
I had my maxed out 2015 work iMac fail last month.

I was holding and hoping I could wait for the new models but not so. I needed something quick and was on the fence between a refurbished iMac Pro or a 2019 with specs I needed...for close to $1000 cheaper.

I have always wanted to upgrade to an iMac Pro since they came out but could not justify it for my work. I was hoping the first round of iMac Pros (with a larger hard drive) would have dropped more in price....never really did. OWC had some low-cost 1TB units when the pandemic hit but the price shot up pretty quickly.

I went with the 2019 iMac and it will do for the next year...then I can get the new model. To order a BTO 2020, there was a wait for weeks...2022 will be my year!
 
I just don't think there's much of a market for a pro-grade AIO. I'm guessing the iMac Pro probably only sold well around launch, when the most CPU you could get in an iMac was a lowly quad core, thanks to Intel.
It sold well to those who were willing to spend an extra $3000 or so to get a much less noisy iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uller6
This is probably still the initial production run which is why it never got a spec bump. Who would have thought demand would be low for a $5000 and up all-in-one.

While supplies last on this machine probably means it will be available through 2035.
The initial production run came with an 8-core as the base model. They've stopped selling that model a while ago, the stock model sold now is a 10-core version. The iMac Pro also had quite a lot of configuration options, those were built-to-order and definitely not all coming off an initial production run.
 
Some rumors suggest that while the smaller frame iMac with Apple silicon is close, the larger one might still be a ways off (winter or spring of next year).
 
Bought a nearly maxed out iMac Pro back in January 2018 and it's been such a solid machine for 6K/8K video work. Have gotten great use out of it and, in hindsight, an excellent investment. Just now starting to consider a replacement so it's interesting to read this. Definitely curious to see what the Apple silicon iMac's are like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uller6
Intriguing the rumor recently of different colored iMacs for the future redesign expected. As now clearly the black color is no longer going to be an option. So something is adding up here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madd the Sane
It uses those space-heater, X86 Intel processors so, no thanks. Goodbye X86 Intel, hello ARM Apple Silicon. I almost feel sorry for the loyal Mac users who purchased that iMac Pro. Even with all those processor upgrade options, it didn't seem to be worth the price. Intel really screwed over Apple with their flaky processor roadmap that fell years behind and Apple had to take the blame for the thermal-throttling problems. I do like the darker color of the iMac Pro, but along with the advanced cooling solution, that's about the only good thing I can now say about it. It was more computer than I needed, so I wasn't going to buy one, anyway.
 
Not surprising.
Yup. Old parts and design, so if they decide to have a pro all-in-one, they will do it based on the new design.
The iMac Pro was always a stopgap product to bridge the gap between the 2013 trashcan Mac Pro and the current Mac Pro.
It is a niche that people may or may not want moving forward.
It doesn’t offer the expandability of a true Pro machine and doesn’t really need to exist anymore.
Never every professional user wants to be able to expand the machine. Many (most?) buy what they need when they need it and then upgrade to a new machine when they need more power. Some certainly like non-all-in-one systems, but from talking to people around the studios, there are certainly some who would want the follow on to the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurgDog
Who is even going to buy these knowing new models are coming soon and without even a price drop?
People who need them. People who have a business rep and can get a discount. People who won the lottery and like the look. :)
 
Last edited:
I thought the big selling point was the redesigned cooling system that was quiet and better able to handle sustained loads? These 2020 iMacs won’t be able to do that. Wait for the Apple Silicon version if that’s important to you because those will be designed and by nature of the new CPU will be quiet and powerful. And hopefully, as the tumors have suggested, come in a space gray or space black colorway.

I think I’m going to sell my 2019 iMac and 2019 MacBook Pro with the second generation MacBook Pro comes out as I anticipate it will be plenty powerful for both of my portable and docked desktop usage requirements. I just hope that my hardware doesn’t sell for peanuts once Apple Silicon has taken over everywhere. Usually it maintains a high resale value, but this changes things substantially.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachingguy
It uses those space-heater, X86 Intel processors so, no thanks. Goodbye X86 Intel, hello ARM Apple Silicon. I almost feel sorry for the loyal Mac users who purchased that iMac Pro. Even with all those processor upgrade options, it didn't seem to be worth the price. Intel really screwed over Apple with their flaky processor roadmap that fell years behind and Apple had to take the blame for the thermal-throttling problems.

I disagree with this viewpoint. Over all those years I've been running quiet PCs with 8-16 core space-heater intel xeons - using either heavy, high-end air coolers (such as noctua d15), or simple AIO water coolers. Apple did not bother making a quiet machine -- it certainly was possible, and with their engineering prowess -- also in small form factor (as clearly evidenced by a lot of people building quiet PCs with very hot CPUs and GPUs in mini ITX boxes). Nope. It was their fault entirely.
 
I loved my iMac, but Apple refused to cover a faulty panel only 3 years after I bought it. Every other OEM always has offered to repair my hardware, ASRock repaired my Mobo 6 years after the fact for FREE and only charged me postage. I'm not going to buy Apple products again after that experience, I have a 2018 Mac and that is the last product I'll buy unless Tim Cook resigns.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Big Ron and R3k
iMP was truly a WTF product. But all jokes aside it was only a stand-in for new Pro tower it didn't have any long term plan to stay alive and get updated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachingguy
Well, considering that apple silicone with 12 cores will outperform 18core iMac Pro, it is no wonder they are discontinuing it. And new iMac will cost how much? I bet the same as intel iMac versions, no change in price. It would be ridiculous to offer it as a product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachingguy
No. Even the top line current Intel processors are nowhere near as smooth as the lowest M1.
Benchmark wise and spec wise, of course they blow it out of the water. But when it comes to optimization an actual experience, they’re still garbage
I see the general computer knowledge of Mac fanatics just keeps dropping.

Do you even know what a CPU does? It's obvious you don't. Better specs but doesn't run as smooth? WTF does smooth have to do with anything when it's slower? You're talking about a GUI and graphics, not CPU.

Optimized? Apple could have optimized any number of things over the years including OpenGL. They didn't give a crap. They let a 'Pro' model fester for years with no updates and no price drops. They purposely slow iOS devices instead of optimizing them to make you buy newer models just to keep the same average speed. Yet people just keep wasting their money. It's mind boggling, but hey, keep sending my Apple shares higher. Fanatics are good for that.
 
The iMacPro prices still better than the current Imac which has nothing but problems with 5700
plus better I/O options
 
M1 is the future of course, but I am starting to think that Apple should develop more pro apps of their own such as logic and FCP to fill instances where developers are not particularly aggressive in supporting the platform. That’s their own design suite, photo editing, CAD, architecture, 3D printing slicing among a few places where there is a space to fill and make sure every use case is always covered natively without having to wait or be held back by developers.
That’s my only concern right now in buying an m1 Mac and waiting for the Adobe suite and pro apps in the above listed categories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJ Dorschel
I love my iMac pro. I understand why most people wouldn't want or need one, but I do a lot of video, website, and podcast work. I never, ever hear the fan running. I also like having the all-in-one unit. I guess the M1 iMac is going to outrun the iMac Pro. However, I'm not sorry I bought iMac Pro and glad I did!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.