Now let’s bring this to that portion mentioned called “the rest of the world”
It’s up to American lawmakers to do it.Now let’s bring this to that portion mentioned called “the rest of the world”
Malicious compliance seems the right response to malicious enforcement.Apple should've done this from the start, but malicious compliance and all.
Isn't it great that we have left the mob days behind of us for good?Back in the mob days this is what would be called a shake-down.
Why so long? Just implement the changes on a future iPadOS 17.x before iPadOS 18.0 goes public. No point to waiting until the last moment anymore, and it would be much better PR for Apple. At this point in time with the maturity of iOS 17.5/IPadOS 17.5 likely the easiest time to do it before testing 18's new features.Apple today confirmed that it will be bringing all of the app ecosystem changes made to iOS in the European Union to iPadOS in the fall.
Except for the reality that iPadOS is iOS in essentially all but name only.Malicious compliance seems the right response to malicious enforcement.
”We have a bunch of quantitative metrics that you don’t violate so we’re holding you in breach of the qualitative one: we don’t like you.”
It serves a different market.Except for the reality that iPadOS is iOS in essentially all but name only.
Not to mention the malicious enforcement you refer to occurred after Apple decided not to make the same changes for iPadOS. You can't respond to something that hasn't happened yet, otherwise it's not a response.It serves a different market.
The iPhone SE and iPhone 15 Pro also serve different markets, but it'd be bold to claim that they're distinctly separate.It serves a different market.
Apple today confirmed that it will be bringing all of the app ecosystem changes made to iOS in the European Union to iPadOS in the fall.
So imagine, if those bad apps infiltrated under Apple's watch, it's going to be much worse now.What caveat? It's not like the App Store is unblemished and Apple can make guarantees about it.
Scam iOS Apps Still Raking in Millions in Revenue on App Store [Updated]
The problem of scam iOS apps has dogged Apple's App Store for some years now, but over last two weeks the developer Kosta Eleftheriou has taken...www.macrumors.com
Why so long?
Nah, I still think they’ll geofence it. If they do it at all it’ll be iOS/iPadOS 19.x next year.In fact, unlike iOS 17.4 and soon 17.5, the support for third-party apps, app stores, and so on will be "baked" into iOS/iPadOS 18.x itself so the setup is pretty much seamless. And it will be applied worldwide.
I’m softening my view on this a bit. There’s still no answer to the question what happens to the user when a big app becomes exclusive to a third-party marketplace and no longer receives updates on the App Store?And now spammers are going to create apps to blast spam to other Apple users.
It's going to be like Android, where Ad popups appear out of nowhere and nobody knows why, and need to install an antivirus on the device.
And software piracy will skyrocket.
I'm definitely not loading anything from third-party stores.
I’m softening my view on this a bit. There’s still no answer to the question what happens to the user when a big app becomes exclusive to a third-party marketplace and no longer receives updates on the App Store?
Amazing, maybe. But in the end, it all comes down to a sacrifice, a loss of a certain € amount, something small in the grand scheme of Apple's EU endeavors.Amazing how the EU can so powerfully run a wrecking ball into portions of Apple's walled garden.
When I had an Android phone 11 years ago I had to go into the settings to allow apps to be installed outside of the Play Store.Android allows any application to be sideloaded and any appstore to be installed. Google Play Store still has everything. And no one is anywhere near the marketshare it has.
Apple certainly know what they’re doing. They are crying, “Oh no! Please don’t make our products more valuable to EU consumers such that it increases our hardware marketshare significantly!! Well, we’ll begrudgingly go ahead and make these changes and just have to satisfy ourselves by crying into the piles of money these additional sales will pull in! Woe is us!”This is further evidence that Apple knows what they‘re doing, giving in this fast cause they know they‘re just buying time stalling DMA rollouts across platforms etc. to get their old business model going "just a little further".
Most of the other artificial roadblockers they have going will fall like domino blocks (little to no resistance from Applw) with the EU starting their nitpicking period.
Pretty much. “We see that this product doesn’t meet the requirements to be defined a gatekeeper, but, today, it’s now a gatekeeper. Why? ‘cause.”Malicious compliance seems the right response to malicious enforcement.
”We have a bunch of quantitative metrics that you don’t violate so we’re holding you in breach of the qualitative one: we don’t like you.”
Good point. I don't see why a big app developer would do that, after considering the pros and cons.I’m softening my view on this a bit. There’s still no answer to the question what happens to the user when a big app becomes exclusive to a third-party marketplace and no longer receives updates on the App Store?
Will they be forced to unlock third-party stores on their iPhones like on Android? What if they don’t want to? Will the app just stop working? How is that “consumer friendly”?