Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There’s no reason Apple couldn’t release an updated version in the future, and that this M2 model has been discontinued simply because stock has now depleted.

Except for the quote that 9to5mac got that. ...

" ...
Apple has also confirmed to 9to5Mac that it has no plans to offer future Mac Pro hardware. ..."

Not only are they saying the M2 version is stopped, but saying it is not a future path either.


Pretty good chance Apple is going to leave it as a 3rd party opportunity to put external wrappers around the Mac Studio and then folks will have their "modular container box". The Studio will just be a part inside the container.
Sonnet's xMac Studio currently uses modular expander boxes. But conceptually someone could bulid something with a fixed set of slots , fixed secured TB wires , and spot to secure the Mac Studio in. Apple wouldn't have to build any of that and it would fill the 'need' for a Mac 'box with slots'.
 
The only selling point of the Mac Pro is PCIe expansion slots. Those enable expandability and compatibility, but Apple Silicon and newer versions of macOS kills compatibility (older expansion cards drivers may not work on new OS), and that kills the only reason of keeping Mac Pro.

If only there was a company that was in a position to design their pro systems to not have so many shortsighted limitations!
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyliej
I think Apple concluded it wasn’t feasible to keep producing Ultra processors and that the vast majority of Mac customers are served by its existing lineup.
 
Yup! Ironically I could see them reintroducing the xserve based on their internal purpose-built AI servers before I’d expect the MP reintroduced, that would actually be a new market for Apple to explore

Apple's AI servers run PCC OS . It is stripped down to the iOS size level with a narrow set of augments. It doesn't keep any persistent user data. It isn't a general purpose server usecase.

Apple isn't trying to displace their current Cloud services hardware with their AI servers. It was only a specialized , highly proprietary task they are loaded with. A SoC optimized for that isn't going to get them into the generic Linux server market.

Apple has no general purpose server OS.
 
But you can’t call Mac Studio a pro device. It’s BYODKM. If you want the pros to use it, include a keyboard and a mouse with purchase. This ain’t Mac Mini. Pros expect to have keyboard and mouse to come with the computer.
I'd much prefer BYODKM instead of being forced to buy a Magic Mouse.

The trashcan Mac Pro also didn't come with a keyboard or mouse.

I do get that you could just simply custom order your Mac Pro to come with the keyboard and trackpad, but still, why?

I don't think any "pro" cared about the keyboard and mouse coming in the box and I'd laugh at the idea that they'd turn down a $6000 computer and choose to buy from the likes of Dell instead just because of this.
 
Can someone PLEASE fire Timmy and the Executive Team? They’re all too old, too rich, and too shortsighted. They fail to understand that you supply workstations, servers, wireless access points, printers, and monitors to get EVERY customer into the ecosystem, paying for monthly services, which is where the REAL money is.

Why did Bill Gates grasp this in 1980, but Timmy hasn’t figured it out almost half a century later? Some genius.
Seriously? You somehow fault Cook for making Apple dominant in the tech world by making great products and doing it profitably. Versus Gates who was born wealthy, bought DOS and used his socialite connections to get IBM to use DOS on IBM's venture into PCs. At that time IBM was the name in computing, so it immediately made Microsoft's DOS acceptable to all the corporate buyers who were fearful of buying anything but IBM.

Bill Gates, who totally missed the internet despite being ideally placed, was no tech genius. He was very savvy though, and had superb timing. Cook is a true business genius who has served Apple very well for decades.
 
You can still get your rack-mounted M2 Mac Pro in the refurnished store. unfortunately it seems the wheels aren't compatible with it. such a shame.

 
Maybe its just me, but that design really makes me feel uncomfortable. The back of the Pro Display XDR was the same. I may just have mild trypophobia. 😀
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slix
Well, they stopped chasing the “very” high-end, that’s true. At their upper-end they making high-end consumer laptops and decent (but extremely high end) workstations, but they’ve given up on enterprise level equipment across the board.

But realistically, their biggest selling product by a long shot is a smartphone - consumer level is what they do now, it’s just that these days consumer-level technology is very powerful, and far more powerful then their previous enterprise level technology. Mid-range to high-range consumer tech has made Apple rich, so you can’t blame them for focusing on that rather than “proper” high-end enterprise tech.

I think nvidia is in a much more precarious position, focusing over 9O% of their production on extremely high-end chips and related equipment to serve a single purpose, an industry and technology that doesn’t actually make any profit, but is covering running costs through investment rounds, again and again.

As for AS reaching its limit, maybe, but it’s already been more long-lived than PPC in terms of hav8 h yet to peak. Even if the performance does peak in the next year to three years, that’s still respectable enough compared to the previous chip architectures they’ve used.

I think that’s part of the cycle, and this is the fourth iteration of that cycle. Either they’d manage the transition to a new cycle well, or they won’t. But they’re in a better position than in previous cycles, as now they are rich enough and big enough to just buy a new chip technology outright when performance improvements with AS starts hitting the wall.

That AS will, at some point, inevitably hit its limit, doesn’t mean catastrophe. It just means changing up again.
But it’s peaking by adding cores, and you see that by the single core score stagnation.
Except for the quote that 9to5mac got that. ...

" ...
Apple has also confirmed to 9to5Mac that it has no plans to offer future Mac Pro hardware. ..."

Not only are they saying the M2 version is stopped, but saying it is not a future path either.


Pretty good chance Apple is going to leave it as a 3rd party opportunity to put external wrappers around the Mac Studio and then folks will have their "modular container box". The Studio will just be a part inside the container.
Sonnet's xMac Studio currently uses modular expander boxes. But conceptually someone could bulid something with a fixed set of slots , fixed secured TB wires , and spot to secure the Mac Studio in. Apple wouldn't have to build any of that and it would fill the 'need' for a Mac 'box with slots'.
who knows, they may offer a studio rack version but it’s unlikely
 
But you can’t call Mac Studio a pro device. It’s BYODKM. If you want the pros to use it, include a keyboard and a mouse with purchase. This ain’t Mac Mini. Pros expect to have keyboard and mouse to come with the computer.
I just checked the purchase history of the Dell Precision in my office. It did "come with" a keyboard and a mouse, but that's an extra charge selected by default.
 
Never owned one but my late father owned them for his work. He’s the one who got me into tech.

Feels like the end of an era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trusso
I never owned a trash can Mac Pro, but I did appreciate its form factor. IMO, it's too bad it didn't work for technical / thermal reasons.
 
NOOOOOO!!!

Just kidding.

The less freedom the customer has, the better.

Jokes aside, computer companies treat older models like a dead Christmas tree after the holidays are over.
 
Almost 20 years. A good run for (about half of) the Mac Pro's life!

Time to boot up my 2006 Mac Pro again and do some work on it in the next couple weeks. 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: trusso
Ok I’m gonna throw out a crazy prediction. They killed the Mac Pro but really it will only be the name. They’ll keep it discontinued for a while, and then bring back this design in the newly named product called Mac Ultra. It will feature the X1 chip and the optional G1 chip.

X1 will essentially be the SoC above the M Ultra chip, and the G1 will be similar but much more GPU focused by going all out with GPU cores, and the real kicker will be that both will be upgradable. Apple will sell the X1 and the G1 as standalone products, and you pop them in the Mac Ultra body like a PCI card, and you can add multiple G1 cards if you wanted. Essentially making a modular upgradable Mac but still locked in to Apple’s way like they like to do. The Mac Ultra will essentially just be the body with a power supply and cooling system with the ability to add storage and these chips that Apple will sell as simple plug n play cards. I would fully expect just the standalone X1 and G1 cards to be minimum starting at $3k each. But giving the ability to buy them separately gives a much bigger incentive to upgrade more often. You could just keep your Mac Ultra but go from the X1 to the X4 or whatever.

Yeah probably never gonna happen but that’s how I’m gonna see this news. Because this iteration of the Mac Pro came out in 2019, why would Apple go through all the R&D of designing this version if they knew the Apple silicon transition would kill it? That just seems like such a waste of money when they could’ve just replaced the trash can Mac Pro with the Mac Studio if that’s all they were gonna do.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.