Apple Considered Offering Original TV Content Free to Customers Who Bought AppleCare

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 22, 2019.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple will debut its rumored television service on Monday, and ahead of the event, The Washington Post has shared some new details on the planning that has gone into Apple's TV service.

    When deciding how to distribute its original television content and at what cost, Apple reportedly considered offering free television shows to customers who paid the extra fee for AppleCare for their Mac and iOS devices.

    [​IMG]

    Apple also considered an offering through the Apple TV, and recent rumors have suggested that the content Apple offers will actually be provided through the TV app on iOS devices and the company's set-top box. There's also a possibility that Apple will distribute its content outside of its own platform as well, which is something else the company has mulled.

    Apple's plans are still not clear to industry insiders and Hollywood executives, and one source that provided the above info to The Washington Post said that Apple's plans have changed multiple times.
    Film and TV creators who are working with Apple have been left in the dark about the company's plans and do not know if content will be exclusive to Apple users or available to everyone. Creators received "obfuscation and ambiguous responses" when asking about distribution, with some speculating that Apple may not have made up its mind about the finer details of the streaming service.
    Recent reports from The Information and Recode have suggested Apple may be planning to offer its own content in the TV app at no cost as a way to lure Apple users to purchase subscriptions for other services, such as Showtime or Starz, within the TV app.

    Apple plans to offer a range of different content from various content partners, and has plans to provide bundles of cable channels. These partnerships are said to be the true focus of Apple's TV service, and what will drive up the company's services revenue.

    As we've previously heard, Apple has invested millions of dollars in its original television shows. Reese Witherspoon and Jennifer Aniston, who will star in a morning show drama tentatively called "The Morning Show," are being paid approximately $1.1 million per episode each.

    While there have been mixed rumors about Apple's efforts to control the content that's released on its platform, Apple has been willing to create "edgy" shows. One person involved with Apple said Apple executives in Cupertino have stayed out of the creative process.

    Apple CEO Tim Cook has, however, "passed notes" to writers on Apple shows through Apple's Hollywood team because Tim Cook, as we've heard before, is aiming to protect Apple's brand and reputation. Apple, for example, shelved "Vital Signs," a show starring Dr. Dre, as was reported earlier last year. Apple could perhaps release this show sometime later, according to sources that spoke to The Washington Post.

    Apple will answer at least some of the questions about its streaming service plans on Monday, March 25, which is when its "It's Showtime" event will take place. The event will start at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, with MacRumors planning to offer live coverage both on MacRumors.com and the MacRumorsLive Twitter account.

    Article Link: Apple Considered Offering Original TV Content Free to Customers Who Bought AppleCare
     
  2. TVreporter macrumors 6502

    TVreporter

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2012
    Location:
    Near Toronto
    #2
    I often wonder if these rumours of flying by the seat of their pants and last-minute decisions are really how things operate in the Mother Ship.

    Difficult to fanthom a trillion dollar company would be in that much disarray and be so indecisive.

    Subscription via AppleCare I could accept - but that sounds too reasonable and inexpensive for that to come to fruition.
     
  3. velocityg4 macrumors 601

    velocityg4

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia
    #3
    Apple considered it. Then the execs realized they need more ivory back scratchers.
     
  4. martyjmclean macrumors 6502

    martyjmclean

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    #4
    All the rumours I’ve read about this streaming service aren’t good. Apple can’t secure deals, overly regulated content... now bundled with Apple Care (Why not Apple Music?) because it can’t stand on its own.
     
  5. az431 macrumors 65816

    az431

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #5
    Wonder how many more times MR is going to recycle this same story by simply adding new unnamed sources who offer non-specific allegations about what Apple might or might not do.
     
  6. cardfan macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
  7. az431 macrumors 65816

    az431

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #7
    Did you read the entire article? Nowhere does it say that Apple will be bundling this with AppleCare, and it certainly does not state that, if it did, that it would be because “it can’t stand on its own.”
     
  8. AppleFan91 macrumors 68000

    AppleFan91

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Location:
    Indy, US
    #8
    I just have such a bad feeling about Monday. Idk why and I hope it’s great, but man, it just seems like a “hey, we have something like you guys (PS Vue, Hulu, YoutubeTV,etc) too! If their plan is to entice people with their own shows...good luck.

    In terms of the news subscription, I feel like that’s such a niche market. Unless they bundle news, tv/movies and Apple Music together, it’s gonna be a tough sell. Only thing that would intrigue me is if they managed to include their full iTunes Store movie’s & shows for a subscription. Like Apple Music was to the iTunes Store
     
  9. lsutigerfan1976 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    #9
    I didn’t know this was comedy hour lol
     
  10. martyjmclean macrumors 6502

    martyjmclean

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2018
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    #10
    Did you read my entire post? Nowhere did I say it will be bundled with Apple Care. I’m talking about the rumours... because this is MacRumours.
     
  11. aneftp macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    #11
    Nothing is free from apple unless they are forced into a corner (mobile me??) remember that.
     
  12. johnyslats macrumors 6502a

    johnyslats

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2012
    Location:
    Leeds, UK
    #12
    Free with Apple Care? Interesting. Hope that's not why they're introducing limited warranty status in iOS 12.2. I get the feeling they've moved away from that proposition however. Would like to read the article, but alas, it's behind a paywall!
     
  13. thasan macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Location:
    Germany
  14. Bin Cook macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2018
    #14
    There is a lot of throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks since Steve passed. Such a shame that Tim can’t handle big personalities.
     
  15. cardfan macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    #15
    Not sure why you think a sub based on iTunes Store content is even a possibility. That’s a different animal altogether and would never happen.

    This is apple pulling a string. They’re unsure what it is they’re trying to do. Trial and error so to speak. Of course it won’t end well. If they were actually serious and had any sort of well thought out plan they’d have acted much sooner and actually spent some real money as well as making key acquisitions.

    It’s a loser. The event to draw attention to it will make it that much worse for them later when it fails. Hopefully we can get past this sideshow soon and on to better things.
     
  16. star_nerdy macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    #16
    Offer it to free to anyone who buys an iPhone or iPad in the trade in program.

    That gives you AppleCare and pushes people into the program.

    That pushes them to upgrade more often aka every 2 years instead of 4.

    You’d get equipment to recycle, which you could then resell for even more profit.

    Apple would make money over money to increase iPhone sales and in turn only spend a few million dollars for content.
     
  17. AppleFan91 macrumors 68000

    AppleFan91

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Location:
    Indy, US
    #17
    Which is why I said I’m not excited about it. The only thing that would appeal to people in masses would be a subscription method for the iTunes Store. I’m agreeing with you.
     
  18. melancholy macrumors 6502

    melancholy

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2016
    #18
    It’s becuz aPple has standards.
     
  19. JPack macrumors 68040

    JPack

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    #19
    Just look at Project Titan (car) and the constant reorganization associated with that project. When Apple ventures into the unknown, things often don’t work as planned.
     
  20. tevion5 macrumors 68000

    tevion5

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Location:
    Ireland
    #20
    Exactly, this is no place for rumours.
     
  21. Heelpir8 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2019
    #21
    Me too. I’m imagining Tim and company huddled around an Apple HQ conference room table all weekend looking a lot like I did while cramming for a next day test in college. LOL
     
  22. az431 macrumors 65816

    az431

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #22
    Then your post makes zero sense because your conclusion depends on the premise that Apple has decided to bundle steaming with AppleCare and that it did so because it couldn’t sell streaming by itself. You remove those two things and it’s just gibberish.
     
  23. gigapocket1 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    #23
    Wow... first off. Jennifer Aniston and co got over big time! 1.1 million per episode for a show that you don’t know if it even is going to be a hit. It takes several seasons before you put out that kind of money.
    They only way Apple would do that. Is if for one. They have to exclusively make shows for Apple only. No other streaming platform.. 2. They have to be apart of a big marketing campaign..
    --- Post Merged, Mar 22, 2019 ---
    But once again. The more I think about it. If Apple offers iCloud space/ Apple TV content/ Apple Music / and app subscriptions for. $40 a month. I would be in.
     
  24. EightyTwenty macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
  25. shyam09 macrumors 68020

    shyam09

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    #25
    This random bird once told me ... "chirp chirp chirp chirpidee chirpidee chirp."

    I spoke to an expert in bird-ology (Charlie Day) and he informed that the bird said he spoke to one of his bird pals who was about to eat a worm that came out of an Apple, when the worm told him that the Apple Television service is going to be named Apple Cable.

    There you go MR, your next article.
     

Share This Page