Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Then we end up with a load of crap apps, malware and other stuff.

I don't see what devs are finding so difficult about the Today view panel. The name "Today View" should be clear enough - it's for information related to "today". E.g. what is the status of my app "right now".

I partly blame apple for this though - they should have applied the rules consistently from the start, instead of annoying people months later.

Eh... many of the things that become official in iOS exist because the developer community created them first. The most famous of all UI paradigms is "Pull to Refresh" first done in Tweetie.

The other problem with the rules is that they are indeed inconsistently applied. I mean, if Yosemite has an official calculator widget, one would presume that you could make one in iOS, but the PCalc debacle is proof enough that even obvious things aren't so obvious anymore.
 
Why not just let users install whatever and devs make whatever?

Because when it doesn't work properly, the user blames Apple. It's on the iOS lockscreen, so obviously it must be an iOS problem, thinks the average user.

When an app is crappy, the user blames the app maker.
 
What annoys me the most is that they are letting the app through with these features initially. If they said no from the start I'd be less annoyed and understanding.

The fact they're taking U-turns is pathetic and they need to sort things out. Draw a line now and not annoy more people with these stupid rules that seem to apply whenever and wherever they like.

Agreed. They giveth, and then take away. But i think that once people have had a taste of something, it's harder to avoid letting them have it. Like when they were going to pull the calculator app widgets... and then changed their minds. I assume after a lot of uproar over it.

I guess we know what we have to do from now on. Any app at all that we think we may or may not want to use at some point, we have to download... so we have a copy of it. I still regret now getting that damn launchpad app.
 
Last edited:
I'm kinda surprised that I haven't seen this comment yet, but I have a feeling this simplicity model has as much to do (if not more so) with Apple watch as it does the iPhone. These widgets are meant to be the same concept as the glances on the Watch. Glances cannot be interactive (I don't believe). So Apple wants to create as much cohesion between the two platforms as possible. It makes sense, but do I like it? Maybe not.

Honestly, I'm not too sure why glances can't be interactive, but that's the direction Apple wants to take it
 
How is this different from what was demoed?

During the WWDC Keynote (go to roughly 1:30:16 or so), Craig demoed the eBay widget and showed off the ability to bid from Notification Center. I'm not sure how that's a significantly different form of interaction from what Drafts is doing.

Seems like a distinction without a difference, really.

As with so many technologies, widgets have grown in productive ways Apple didn't foresee. Rather than bring the hammer down, Apple should be looking for ways to guide developers to be even more productive and consistent with a core set of values in order to bring greater value to users.
 
Last edited:
Agile could just have the widget indicate if you have created any drafts today or that you have not. Then touching launches D4.
 
I have a question for the entire forum.

Since iOS only allows installs from the app store, would you get a computer that you could only get software through the app store with unless you jailbroke it?

Think of it like a Mac that only has the app store for software and nothing else, I think the comparison works great. An Iphone is a computer like a mac and it runs some glued together Mac Os code like a mac, but doesn't allow installs from other places than the app store.

I guess my question would be...

Why do you not think this is going to happen?

We are past computers being computers. Computers are appliances now. If you don't think that's the way OS X will act in 5 years, then set a reminder for yourself in your calendar app to revisit this thread in 2020.

The difference is that Apple was able to establish this level of control to begin with. With OS X, they will have to gradually transition and ween users off alternative installation sources.

Remember, the computer is truck. If you need a truck you get a truck. Most people don't need trucks.
 
I have a question for the entire forum.

Since iOS only allows installs from the app store, would you get a computer that you could only get software through the app store with unless you jailbroke it?

Think of it like a Mac that only has the app store for software and nothing else, I think the comparison works great. An Iphone is a computer like a mac and it runs some glued together Mac Os code like a mac, but doesn't allow installs from other places than the app store.
A better question is why bother asking this close to a decade after iOS has been around and has followed this mentality from the beginning? This is nothing new, nothing even close to being new, so what's the point of trying to stir things up to "discuss" something that's basically a given at this point and has been discussed probably literally millions of times by now in the past 7 years or so?
 
Just get rid of notification center and be done with it. Why offer it and then cripple it until it becomes worthless and dies?
 
When iOS 5 first introduced Notification Center, I thought it would be so awesome if Apple opened it up for dev to create widgets.

I was wrong.

Notification Center widgets are terribly designed, grossly implemented, and worst of all, usually comically useless. Just give up and forget about it.
 
What if Apple keeps their restricted app-store but allows installing packages from for example dropbox? Several mobile OSs supports this.

That's how you end up with unauthorized app distribution websites which sell stolen apps and/or apps which steal your personal info and/or apps with an inferior UX.

All of which is exactly what Apple is trying to avoid by running the iOS App Store.

In the process, Apple may not draw the lines in quite the right spots (some crappy apps still get allowed, some great, innovative apps are rejected) but it's pretty good.

Most users aren't savvy enough to realize what the difference between downloading from the official store or an unofficial one (heck, an unofficial one might try making itself out to be the official one). If they were smart enough, trojans, viruses, and malware wouldn't exist/spread. But they do because most people don't understand the technology they use.
 
I'm surprised at the number of people who visit an Apple rumours website who are so misinformed about Apple's vision ...

In this case, Apple doesn't have a vision.

And if it weren't for the jailbreak community, Apple may never have had the "vision" for any supported third-party apps. It's not entirely clear that Apple originally had a plan for any 3rd party apps for the iPhone, except for web apps, which they very heavily promoted as *the* superior and only method for apps until iOS 2.

Apple has now added widgets like jailbreaks and other OSes have allowed, but semantically it's a bit of a jumbled mess to combine them with notifications, which I believe is why they have difficulty determining which widgets make sense.
 
So will Evernote be removed? Think not

Winner winner chicken dinner.

This whole thing behind apps breaking the guidelines of NC Widgets has been selective at best. Drafts does nothing different from Evernote and Evernote has had a NC Widget since iOS 8 hit the public servers.
 
I have a question for the entire forum.

Since iOS only allows installs from the app store, would you get a computer that you could only get software through the app store with unless you jailbroke it?

Think of it like a Mac that only has the app store for software and nothing else, I think the comparison works great. An Iphone is a computer like a mac and it runs some glued together Mac Os code like a mac, but doesn't allow installs from other places than the app store.

If it offered sufficient utility then why not?
 
If you want out of control UIs from an out of control mobile OS, you are more than free to buy a OnePlus One or a Samsung Galaxy.

Seriously? I just want my Widgets to actually be Widgets and not a blob of text.

XjBorY4.png
 
The other problem with the rules is that they are indeed inconsistently applied. I mean, if Yosemite has an official calculator widget, one would presume that you could make one in iOS.

Yes, but the Yosemite widget lives in the dashboard, not the notification area. iOS doesn't have a dashboard - so it's not a straight comparison.
 
What annoys me the most is that they are letting the app through with these features initially. If they said no from the start I'd be less annoyed and understanding.

The fact they're taking U-turns is pathetic and they need to sort things out. Draw a line now and not annoy more people with these stupid rules that seem to apply whenever and wherever they like.

Their developer guidelines are fairly clear:
Apple said:
People visit Notification Center to get brief updates or to perform a very simple task, so it’s best when your Today widget displays the right amount of information and limits interactivity.
[...]
As much as possible, let users perform a task or open your app with a single tap (note that the keyboard is not available within a Today widget).

The obvious suggestion is, don't replicate app functionality, and don't use a fake keyboard. If they wanted Today extensions to use the keyboard, they would've provided access to it.

Many apps slipped through in the iOS 8 launch rush. App reviewers were overwhelmed. Apple is now going back to kicking out apps that flagrantly violated their intentions.
 
Then we end up with a load of crap apps, malware and other stuff.

I don't see what devs are finding so difficult about the Today view panel. The name "Today View" should be clear enough - it's for information related to "today". E.g. what is the status of my app "right now".

I partly blame apple for this though - they should have applied the rules consistently from the start, instead of annoying people months later.

Because it's not so cut and dry. Our app - Pocket Informant - has a today widget that shows events and tasks for "Today". But we also have a button to open our "Focus" view which shows the focus of today. And we have buttons to create an event, task, or note. It just feels natural there and is an extension of showing stuff for "Today".

I'm now expecting Apple to ask us to remove it soon as well. The only people hurt are the users. In our case it doesn't negatively effect the purpose of the widget.
 
Because it's not so cut and dry. Our app - Pocket Informant - has a today widget that shows events and tasks for "Today". But we also have a button to open our "Focus" view which shows the focus of today. And we have buttons to create an event, task, or note. It just feels natural there and is an extension of showing stuff for "Today".

I'm now expecting Apple to ask us to remove it soon as well. The only people hurt are the users. In our case it doesn't negatively effect the purpose of the widget.

And if iOS supported installing apps outside the app store you could just turn elsewhere with your app, which is not an option now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.