Just as well. All we need are apps that contribute to and multiply the overload of useless information.
I still prefer to think of the iPhone as a music playing phone that happens to have internet. With occasional directions/photos. I don't want it to be or act like a real computer (but I still want the power and customization jailbreaking brings with it). But that's just me. And what do I know, I'm still on iOS 6.Since iOS only allows installs from the app store, would you get a computer that you could only get software through the app store with unless you jailbroke it?
Think of it like a Mac that only has the app store for software and nothing else, I think the comparison works great. An Iphone is a computer like a mac and it runs some glued together Mac Os code like a mac, but doesn't allow installs from other places than the app store.
Stupifying OS X would be like selling you the truck and then not letting you leave downtown.The difference is that Apple was able to establish this level of control to begin with. With OS X, they will have to gradually transition and ween users off alternative installation sources.
Remember, the computer is truck. If you need a truck you get a truck. Most people don't need trucks.
Yes. This. This will be my mantra until I die.What is so wrong with putting a toggle, hidden away in the Settings app, that says "I'm not Grandma, please un-Fisher Price my phone"? ...Apple needs to take a page from how they handle the Mac. For almost anyone, the road blocks they put up aren't ever noticed, so they aren't a problem.
Pity most developers cannot read and assume without explicit dos and don'ts that they can attempt to exploit more functionality out of an interface that isn't hard to determine its intended purpose.
Maybe this apps allow a vulnerability that would provide -for example- a way to bypass the lock screen?The goal of the app store guidelines should be to ensure that malware/viruses and information stealing apps are not on the app store. This is just Apple's control freak.
Because if an unknowing user installs an app that hinders the experience of iOS that makes iOS look bad. The average user will be like "Why does my phone look like this now!?" rather than "Why does this app make my phone look like this now?"
I'm surprised at the number of people who visit an Apple rumours website who are so misinformed about Apple's vision ...
I think it's a worthwhile "War". If an app is THAT important to a user, stick it in the dock!
Part of what I meant is pretty much what you expanded on. It's definitely not a prison, but it's also not a plain open field either. The main point I was driving at is that these various things are known and have been known of years, and to be outraged about them is rather silly and unproductive. It's one thing to dislike certain aspects or wish that something was better or different, but that's quite a ways from various posts that are simply questioning why people even bother with iOS (and in the process also basically implying that those people aren't thinking for yourself). That's not really discussing some aspects of things or anything like that, that's just empty rhetoric at best given that nothing really new or useful comes from that.I'm going to have to disagree with your opinion. Not your opinion of an informed person making a decision; with that I agree completely. It's your assessment of iOS I take issue with. You're implying iOS is all about Apple's vision of how things should be for everyone. At least that's what I get from what you wrote. I think iOS is Apple's vision of how a mobile OS should run; as in a cohesive blend of software and hardware to provide a great user experience. The products of that vision are, in my opinion, to be used by the consumer in their own way. That's why you will rarely ever find two iPhones containing the exact same apps. If it was about Apple's vision for everyone, wouldn't all the apps Apple thought we needed be preloaded? Also there would be no need for an app store beyond music and games. If Apple wanted to add an app to their vision they would just download it to your phone. You know, like the U2 album. Sorry couldn't resist.In other words, Apple would curate all the devices. I think Apple provides a base platform for individuals to express their own preferences.
What you propose is neither straightforward nor rational (I should say my interpretation of what you propose. I could be dead wrong). No one would go for that. The garden may be walled but it's not a prison. Nor is it a take it or leave it proposition. It's entirely reasonable for someone to not like some thing about a product or service and still like it overall.
Each year, the temptation to switch to a nexus seems to be stronger for me. I'm just scared that nexus won't be a smooth experience.
That's why guidelines for new features are somewhat fluid especially in the beginning. It's not great, but it's the reality of things. It will settle down as this won't be new anymore and more cases are covered in a better way in the guidelines and more reviewers are better trained at applying the newer guidelines in a more consistent way.But when those same developers see similar functionality being used by other developers' widgets could they not assume the functionality is okay? Could that assumption be further bolstered by the fact of their own widget being accepted? I mean if I am a developer and I see widgets with actionable function already approved and running and my actionable functions get approved as well, what else am I supposed to think?
Add to that, I see Apple allow a widget to have higher function in the NC, ban it, and then turn around and allow it back. So where are the explicit dos and don'ts in that scenario?
Because clearly by having some guidelines (which are being refined at times) means that it's completely closed or even as closed as it was before iOS 8.I'm sooooo glad they are starting to open up iOs.![]()
Why do you not think this is going to happen?
We are past computers being computers. Computers are appliances now. If you don't think that's the way OS X will act in 5 years, then set a reminder for yourself in your calendar app to revisit this thread in 2020.
The difference is that Apple was able to establish this level of control to begin with. With OS X, they will have to gradually transition and ween users off alternative installation sources.
Remember, the computer is truck. If you need a truck you get a truck. Most people don't need trucks.
Majority of the consumers using a phone do not need an application that is outside Apple's boundaries of what is acceptable. This is something I completely agree with Apple, even if it limits some functionality that can only come from something like a jailbreak.
Chances are if you're looking for that functionality, Apple believes you're better served by Android or Windows, who both are starting to become more like Apple in the way they control the way apps are being made.
So you made the decision that iOS isn't for you. Great?Crazy stupid talk....but seems to be the Apple way.
"Apple's boundaries of what is acceptable"
No thanks...much rather have my phone function according to how I want it to function. I don't need Apple to tell me that I can or can't put a shortcut to launch an app in my notifications are. Thankfully this feature is allowed and works great on Android.
Why not just let users install whatever and devs make whatever?
Crazy stupid talk....but seems to be the Apple way.
"Apple's boundaries of what is acceptable"
No thanks...much rather have my phone function according to how I want it to function. I don't need Apple to tell me that I can or can't put a shortcut to launch an app in my notifications are. Thankfully this feature is allowed and works great on Android.
It will not happen.
Then we end up with a load of crap apps, malware and other stuff.
I don't see what devs are finding so difficult about the Today view panel. The name "Today View" should be clear enough - it's for information related to "today". E.g. what is the status of my app "right now".
I partly blame apple for this though - they should have applied the rules consistently from the start, instead of annoying people months later.
Slippery slopes are fun.It's happening now. Right now. As we speak.
The average user will buy a Mac and use the Mac App Store. If they happen to find a piece of software on the Internet and try to install it they'll most likely get an error. Then they'll have to find out how to enable application installs from everywhere.
Right now, it's deafulted to 'Mac App Store and identified developers'. How much longer before its set to just 'Mac App Store' by default? Two years? Three years? Then how much longer before the option to even change it is removed?
It's already been decided.
It will end up being very bad for some users. Malware will be an serious issue, lots of cracked apps, and general nasty stuff that is all over Android.
No. 100% FUD. Sure if you use shady .apk sites (or jailbroken iOS sites) malware is a risk. But stock Google Play Store/iOS Store? NOPE. Truth, delivered. Fact.
It's happening now. Right now. As we speak.
The average user will buy a Mac and use the Mac App Store. If they happen to find a piece of software on the Internet and try to install it they'll most likely get an error. Then they'll have to find out how to enable application installs from everywhere.
Right now, it's deafulted to 'Mac App Store and identified developers'. How much longer before its set to just 'Mac App Store' by default? Two years? Three years? Then how much longer before the option to even change it is removed?
It's already been decided.
So you made the decision that iOS isn't for you. Great?
You made your choice. Enjoy Android.