Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Example: NOTHING can justify the ridiculous SSD upgrade prices (even with same performance metrics) but pure greed. Greed which begins to damage their image.

put higher margins on larger SSDs so that they can lower the prices on the base SSDs. it's a standard corporate pricing strategy
 
Hi Jeff, one iPhone costs one grand, two for 2, and 3 for 3.... simple right? The thing is we do have to replace 3 iPhones in short, very short period of time, and periodically. And MacBooks, speakers, watches. They add up. You knew that, for sure, right? Good. Great!
You can buy an iPhone 7, or a much cheaper Android. Apple is not a monopoly in smartphone business. The same for laptops and especially speakers. Plenty of cheaper alternatives. You pick the Apple ecosystem by your own volition.
 
Thank God for websites like Swappa and eBay. I probably wouldn’t be able to afford Apple products. I cannot remember the last time I purchased a brand new Apple product at full price.

I used to always buy new, but with the latest prices I only look at refurbs (15% off) or lightly used with good battery capacity. You can get a lot of phone for $350-$600.
 
I understand if they want to charge more, but if consumers stop buying their products then there will definitely be a problem. I'm sure there is some major disconnect between Apple's share price and how much revenue and profit Apple makes. Microsoft is valued much higher in overall value than Apple despite making less revenue and profit. Apple has somehow messed up when it comes to convincing big investors they have decent growth potential.

I'm willing to pay for Apple products if I really want them because I want products that last a long time and most of my Apple products have lasted quite a long time. I don't think most consumers think that way, so Apple is going to have a huge disadvantage. I believe if Apple thinks they can keep charging consumers high prices and expect growth, then I think they're wrong. If Apple wants to keep charging high prices then they should come up with some new revenue streams based on enterprise businesses. I'm not trying to tell Apple how to run its business. This is just my opinion and I don't have the money-making capabilities of Apple.

I simply wish Apple would make some desktop products that are easily upgradeable with standard parts. Is it really that difficult for Apple to build a product with easily accessible compartments to upgrade memory and storage as most companies do? I'll pay more if Apple doesn't try to make it difficult for users to upgrade their products. Having to practically tear apart an iMac Pro to replace/upgrade storage is absolutely insane.
People are just not buying phones as often anymore. I’ve met people in the 1% and many are still sporting older iPhones as those meet their needs just fine. Heck, I defer my XR purchase because iOS 12 brings new breath to my 6S. That’s the reality, and Apple should’ve known this as this is exactly what happened to the computer business. Nobody is upgrading their computers every 2 or 3 years, let alone on a yearly basis. Computers from 5+ years ago are still sufficient for most consumer tasks.

Thus the need for services as a constant revenue stream. That’s why Microsoft is pushing Office 365 over their older business model. And that’s imo maybe why investors are valuing Microsoft higher in overall value, as they already have a solution for their business model moving forward. Apple meanwhile has not shown any solid services lineup other than Apple Music.
 
the new samsung costs $2000 if anything we can only blame apple for making it seem normal not being the only culprit. It's a free market if you don't buy it they will stop making it.
 
I think that Apple needs to take a serious look at future pricing. I don't think a lot of people (especially those in their 20s) will continue paying increased prices, even with new products and technology. The monetary saturation point is approaching quickly.

I appreciate Apple products, service, and overall mission. However, I am not going to pay $2k for a phone. I have no problem holding onto my devices longer, instead of upgrading regularly. Even if one has money, that doesn't necessarily mean one should throw it into the wind.


I’m not defending Apple, but I don’t like the statement “... for a phone.” They’re not just phones anymore. Most spend more time doing day to day activities on their “phones” than they do on a desktop or laptop. Apple has always commanded a higher price. The Macintosh Performa 600 we got in 1993 would be nearly $3400 today. The original iPod would be roughly $750 today just to play music. Apple has always been expensive, even that basic white plastic MacBook would be about $1400 today. That’s not too far off form a MacBook Pro today or a $1200 MacBook Air, is it?
 
Last edited:
> “It’s something we’re very aware of,” he said. “We do not want to be an elitist company. That’s not — we want to be an egalitarian company, and we’ve got a lot of work going on in developing markets.”

Hmm... This statement definitely contradicts reality.
The statement the contradicts reality is referring to the iPhone XS Max as the starting point of Apple’s new phones. It’s completely disingenuous. Will they say that Samsung’s new phones start at 1900 or that Oppo’s Phones start at 2600. No. Actually there was not even a blink on these sights at those prices. Twice the price of an iPhone. And they still fail to match the processor, 3D tech and security of the Even just the XS. If Apple had shown a phone that folded from the size of a credit card to an 12.9 inch IPad for $1500 these same people would loose their minds. It’s comical at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeSmoke
Quote: "It's something we're very aware of," he said. "We do not want to be an elitist company. That's not".

Subtext: "Which is why we price our SSD so very reasonably. The update to 1 TB barely is 1000 bucks for what is available for less than one quarter of that in retail. So we overcharge by just 4x, isn't that generous of us?"

What really makes me angry is that they build such a nice Mac Mini even with really well designed cooling for the SSD, which most other systems ignore, and then ruin it for most people with that pricing scheme. You can‘t explain why you should pay more to a system builder for that SSD/M.2 than you would when buying a single unit in a shop yourself.

Apple could have shown their technical design skills and care for detail once more. What could work well if they sold more of those machines. What would work well if they opted for a reasonable pricing approach.

They did fail similarly once already. They had to sell off the cubes at a fraction :/ Mac Pro now has even outdated TB2, who will buy those, even for a fraction?
 
Very aware but not going to do a goddamn thing about it because his CEO wants to nickle and dime every customer he has left.

The arrogence of this company is off the charts
Well if that’s really the case the reduction of their revenue should be off the charts in proportion to their arrogance. I don’t know how many customers they have left but enough of them bought to the tune of $84b dollars last quarter.
[doublepost=1551057639][/doublepost]
What?! LMFAO! That's all Apple's ever been!!! They didn't get to a TRILLION dollar valuation by pricing their products realistically!
It does make me feel better that you realize since Jobs came back Apple has been that company and didn’t start from 2011.
 
“We have all just been incredibly fortunate,” he said. “Too many people who are very successful, I find they start believing a narrative about things that they wouldn’t ordinarily accept. I call it ‘breathing their own exhaust,’ and I don’t have a lot of tolerance for that. I see it pervasively throughout places in Silicon Valley where people start thinking they did it all. And the reality is we’re all benefactors of all the great people who came before us, … and it’s never lost on me, any day I make it up, that there’s a ton of people all over the world that are smarter than me, who work as hard or way harder than me and, under different circumstances, would have been in my place and done a way better job.“

If anything, I really appreciate that quote from the article. So true.
 
I’m not defending Apple, but I also don’t like the statement “... for a phone.” They’re not just phones anymore. Most spend more time doing day to day activities on their “phones” than they do on a desktop or laptop. Apple has always commanded a higher price. The Macintosh Performa 600 we got in 1993 would be nearly $3400 today. The original iPod would be roughly $750 today just to play music. Apple has always been expensive, even that basic white plastic MacBook would be about $1400 today. That’s not too far off form a $1300 MacBook Pro today or a $1200 MacBook Air, is it?
I wasn't discounting the small handheld computer I use every day. I appreciate all that goes into it. I just believe that the pubic at large is not going to pay the big prices from Apple, Sammy or others.

I don't have a problem paying for quality. It is one of the reasons I have paid the Apple premium. Maybe it is time for Apple to slow the new release cycle down a little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scalawagabond
Wanna explain why macOS has been ignored for years if you care so much about products? It still has bugs from years ago that have never been patched, forget new features.
Why has the Mac Pro still not received an update? Why is the MacBook Pro forcefully sold with a Touch Bar? If you care so much about your products why are you still selling the 6th Generation iPod Touch or the 4th Generation iPad Mini? There are so many segments of Apple's product line that show a complete lack of care and attention to detail compared to just 10 years ago.

This I don't think is a very good argument. It's a legitimate complaint, that they ignore specific products, but that doesn't have to do with care that's actually put into those products. If anything, it shows that they won't develop a product just for the hell of it.
 
Dismissing huge margins by citing stuff like R&D etc ... meanwhile, just look at the actual profits (profit, not revenue) they have according to their own earning reports. The whole argument falls apart when looking at the actual numbers.

Example: NOTHING can justify the ridiculous SSD upgrade prices (even with same performance metrics) but pure greed. Greed which begins to damage their image.
What justifies them is they subsidize the cost of the base model. Apple can reduce the price intervals between models, but to maintain margin they would just raise the price of the base model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickUrPoison
I've already bought my last apple products. Macbook pro? Too expensive and doesn't work well. Iphone? Give me a break.
I'll keep buying used or no name. osx used to be reliable to the point of insanity, now it's garbage. windows 10 is better.


See ya. Maybe you can leave this forum too now. Yeah?

And Windows 10 being better than MacOS is just laughable.
 
After running our iPhones into the ground (the newest one we have is a 6), it's evident to me that it's time to get new ones for my whole family (of five). I am not looking forward to that bill.
 
Why is the MacBook Pro forcefully sold with a Touch Bar? If you care so much about your products why are you still selling the 6th Generation iPod Touch or the 4th Generation iPad Mini?

Forcing me to buy a macbook pro with touchbar (instead of traditional keyboard)

So you folks want Apple to “innovate” and include the latest technology in your iPad Minis, but give you older function key technology in your MacBook Pros. Got it....:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.