Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Since Gruber has been known to speak coyly about his occasional inside knowledge

yeah Gruber is the epitome of coy...:rolleyes: Coy being another word apparently for planted leak btw.
 
Wallpaper in the image in this article

A little off the topic, but I like the GREEN wallpaper in this article, anyone know where I can find it?
 
Here is my photoshopped mock-up of how the iPhone 5 might look. In my mock-up, the screen is physically a little wider and quite a lot taller versus the iPhone 4S. The external dimensions of the phone are identical to the iPhone 4S.

The resolution of the display would be 640 x 1040 pixels (iPhone 4S: 640x960 pixels). The 80 extra pixels on the vertical axis will allow for more content on screen -- but it's probably not quite enough for another row of icons. I chose this resolution as it seemed to fit nicely in the available space.

In order to maintain an equal sized bezel above and below the display, the home button had to become slightly smaller. I changed it to an oval shape.

7081464339_0390f4629e.jpg
 
I suggested 1138x640 as this is what you get if you keep the original width as suggested by the story and calculate a 16:9 ratio.

This is a rather odd size, but it is a consequence of trying to make the original story less odd by going to a more common ratio.

Makes sense.

The computer industry is going through the same process that the printing industry went through long ago. People will stop talking about the pixels on screen when we move to these higher dpi screens. It won't matter. There will be a "point" standardization– really, there already is. And I think that's what you and I are seeing about this story. By changing the ratio, Apple is making it way more difficult on everyone involved because they'd be changing the points from 480 x 320.

I think I would literally be flabbergasted if Apple released a different aspect ratio.
 
The resolution of the display would be 640 x 1040 pixels (iPhone 4S: 640x960 pixels). The 80 extra pixels on the vertical axis will allow for more content on screen -- but it's probably not quite enough for another row of icons. I chose this resolution as it seemed to fit nicely in the available space.

That's a good effort, but I really think you could fit a lot more screen in the space.

Let's start with 326 PPI. Per Apple, that's the pixel density of the retina display used by today's iPhone 4S. Now, knowing that the screen size today is 960x640 (I like to list the largest dimension first), we can calculate the exact size of the screen:

W: 960/326 = 2.94"
H: 640/326 = 1.96"

Now, let's consider the overall size of the iPhone 4S (again, per Apple):

W: 4.50"
H: 2.31"

So, as you've already noticed, we obviously have some additional space to work with on the front of the device above and beyond what the current screen requires. Here we can see exactly how much - over 1.5" on the larger dimension nearly 0.5" inch on the smaller one.

Since it is a fairly standard (and useful) resolution, for the sake of argument, let's see how big a 1280x720 display at 326 PPI would be, and whether it would fit the current form factor:

W: 1280/326 = 3.93"
H: 720/326 = 2.21"

Well whaddya know? It fits. Ah, but there are now some issues we've created here:

a) What about the home button and the speaker? There's just over a half inch of space left to accomodate both of them.
b) What about the bezel-size on the small dimension? Current technology may not allow for just 0.05" worth of bezel.
c) What about all the apps already designed for 964x640?

For issue (a), there are a couple solutions. We could move the speaker out more toward the edge of the phone. Additionally, we can either move the home button out toward the edge as well and make it smaller. Or, just remove it altogether, similar to the Nokia N9. Note that in the latter case we could even reposition the screen so it is not centered across the longer dimension of the phone. This would potentially allow us to leave the speaker right where it is today.

For issue (b), the only solution would be to increase the size just a bit. But the good news is it would only be slightly and few would even notice the size increase.

For (c), like I said in an earlier post, you can just use a 960x640 region of the new screen. The nice thing is that since we've kept pixel density the same, the apps will look and behave exactly like they do today.

That's my thoughts. In any case, one thing seems abundantly clear to me: as the iPhone evolves, the screen will take up more and more of the phone's face. I suppose the other side of the argument would be to advocate keeping the screen where it is and shrinking the phone. And maybe there is a demand for such a device as well. But I'd suggest that since we are all used to the current size already, it makes more sense to optimize the use of that space rather than shrinking it down.
 
Last edited:
The "tall" iPhone mockups and "leaks" didn't start showing up until after this Verge mockup caught on with the online community... Am I right? Just kinda strange to me...
 
The "tall" iPhone mockups and "leaks" didn't start showing up until after this Verge mockup caught on with the online community... Am I right? Just kinda strange to me...

That is correct... and the only thing that casts any doubt for me, which is hard to have at this point with so much evidence. Some forum member says 'hey here's an idea' and a few weeks later parts start popping up that fit the description.
 
Yes! My thoughts exactly. I remember seeing this mockup back then and did a little research to find it. And just like you, it's the only thing that's really making this whole tall iPhone news seem kind of shady. I really hope Apple fools everyone on September 12. It will be an epic day if so :apple:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.