Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macmac30

macrumors regular
Nov 19, 2015
162
400


Apple has suffered a setback in its €13 billion ($14 billion) tax dispute with Brussels after an advisor to the EU's highest court said the company's victory in an earlier ruling should be thrown out (via Financial Times).

European-Commisssion.jpg

Giovanni Pitruzzella, advocate-general of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), said on Thursday that Apple's win in the EU General Court "should be set aside" because it is riddled with mistakes.

While such opinions by advocates-general are non-binding, the top EU tribunal follows such advice in the majority of cases, and it is set to issue its binding ruling in the coming months.

In 2020, the General Court said it supported the EU's right to investigate national tax arrangements, but it ultimately overturned a ruling by the European Commission stating that Apple should pay €13 billion euros in tax to the Irish government.

Following Apple's appeal, the EU's second-highest court said the EU authority, led by antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, had failed to show that Apple had received an illegal economic advantage in Ireland over tax.

Four years earlier, Apple CEO Tim Cook called the EC's original decision "total political crap" and said that Apple believed it would be reversed. "The decision is wrong, and it's not based on law or facts, it's based on politics. And I think it's very important that we stand up and say that very loudly," said Cook at the time.

However, Pitruzzella said on Thursday the General Court ruling had "committed a series of errors" and "failed to assess correctly the substance and consequences of certain methodological errors." Pitruzzella said the court needed "to carry out a new assessment" as a result.

Responding to the opinion of the advocates-general, Apple said on Thursday that the lower court "was very clear that Apple received no selective advantage and no State aid, and we believe that should be upheld."

An ECJ ruling is expected next year.

Article Link: Apple Could Pay 'Total Political Crap' $14 Billion Tax Bill to EU After All
Let them use Android…
 

Duncan-UK

macrumors 6502a
Sep 17, 2006
656
1,275
Wait a minute wtf. The equivalent of the attorney general can just say a court decided incorrectly and that’s it, it gets overturned? How is that democratic?
Courts aren't democracies.

The General Court is subservient to the main court, and the main court invariably follows the opinions of the Advocate Generals. Apple seem to be skewered in this case. The whole reason for the EU to exist is to create the single market. If a Member State goes rogue and dishes out hugely advantageous State Aid then this is threatening the integrity of the single market, hence the Courts will act.
 

0339327

Cancelled
Jun 14, 2007
634
1,933
Many Europeans have either lived in a then-communist country or only a few hundred km from the border of one and yet Americans, who basically are on the other side of the planet continue to lecture us as to what communism is. No thanks, we certainly have more experience than you.
Did it ever occur to you to ask how it was that you came to not be under communist rule?

Right, the inconvenient fact that American idealism saved your continent.
 

Patchwork

macrumors 6502
Jan 6, 2008
342
490
Near Preston, UK
ECJ is a kangaroo court, it has no resemblance to a court of law, it's run by the EU bureaucrats, to rule over any legal court rulings, for the benefit of EU's political agenda's.
Tim Cook on this occasion was spot on with his assesment 😡
Gangsters in suits & legal wigs springs to mind!
The ECJ is made up of 27 senior judges, effectively one from each member state, and are tasked with ruling on whether EU law has been adhered to. The 11 advocate generals are specialist in aspects of EU and present legal opinions on cases assigned to them. Having had plenty of dealings with the ECJ professionally, they aren’t bureaucrats and it isn’t a kangaroo court. In your assessment is this based on personal experience or just from what you have read as it doesn’t match my experience?
 

Wildkraut

Suspended
Nov 8, 2015
3,583
7,674
Germany
I will. And as a citizen of an EU member state, I will also remember this when the USA, China, India ... are already using the successor, because in the EU we will still be using the then obsolete USB-C.
Laws are slower than innovation.
How forists in here used to say, just get an adapter!

Anyway, i doubt that Apple will come with anything newer than USB-C in the next decades.
Simply because they still hold strong on USB2.0 transfer speeds, which is nearly 24 years old.
A new plug for old tech has no benefit, except to drive cable and adapter sales.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: aacealo

Duncan-UK

macrumors 6502a
Sep 17, 2006
656
1,275
Wait a minute wtf. The equivalent of the attorney general can just say a court decided incorrectly and that’s it, it gets overturned? How is that democratic?
Courts aren't democracies.

The General Court is subservient to the main court, and the main court invariably follows the opinions of the Advocate Generals. Apple seem to be skewered in this case. The whole reason for the EU to exist is to create the single market. If a Member State goes rogue and dishes out hugely advantageous State Aid then this is threatening the integrity of the single market, hence the Courts will act.
No, that's not quite it. As others have noted, this was an opinion and not a formal ruling as opinions by advocates-general are non-binding. The actual ruling/decision by the European Court of Justice isn't expected until next year. All of this was explained in the article.
Alternatively the real work in the ECJ is done by the Advocate Generals and the Judges are there to provide a bit of window dressing for the Member States. Eg each MS nominates a couple of Judges to join the panel, but the reality of 27 Sovereign States is that you dont get terribly good law that way. Hence the Advocate Generals do the bulk of the work is broadly rubber-stamped by the Judges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarAnalogy

Shasterball

Suspended
Oct 19, 2007
1,177
751
Wait a minute wtf. The equivalent of the attorney general can just say a court decided incorrectly and that’s it, it gets overturned? How is that democratic?
Huh? The system is literally like the US. An official (cf Solicitor General) makes a recommendation to the court. That is what happened here. Then, the court takes all the arguments into consideration and issues an opinion. That will happen next here, as the article says.
 

joecomo

macrumors 6502a
Jul 10, 2010
909
1,154
It's about Ireland giving illegal state aid or not. It isn't about Apple illegally avoiding paying tax in Ireland.

It'a reason why it's called "Commision v Ireland and Others".
Yes and as a "punishment" Ireland will get the money back, that they used to illegally lure Apple into Ireland.
So you can have your cake and eat it ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: aacealo

centauratlas

macrumors 68000
Jan 29, 2003
1,866
3,863
Florida
ECJ is a kangaroo court, it has no resemblance to a court of law, it's run by the EU bureaucrats, to rule over any legal court rulings, for the benefit of EU's political agenda's.
Tim Cook on this occasion was spot on with his assesment 😡
Gangsters in suits & legal wigs springs to mind!

I'd also add: corporations don't pay taxes, people do through higher prices, lower dividends or lower salaries. So when this kind of thing happens, remember it is a stealth tax on everyone who uses and Apple product, works for Apple or owns Apple stock (e.g. though an ETF or retirement plan or in their brokerage account).

Apple is a hidden tax collector and makes a good target for bureaucrats who want more money but don't want to be seen raising taxes on the rest of us.
 

siddavis

macrumors 6502a
Feb 23, 2009
888
2,999
Wait a minute wtf. The equivalent of the attorney general can just say a court decided incorrectly and that’s it, it gets overturned? How is that democratic?
I love it when people are shocked that tyranny can cut against their preferred vision.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CarAnalogy

SoGood

macrumors 6502
Apr 9, 2003
457
243
The real question highlighted and people should ask is, why are so many multi-million dollar court case rulings across the US and EU countries get thrown out by ‘higher‘ courts? So why bother with those incompetent court systems than just going to the ‘higher‘ courts? How many of those case ruling have been similarly faulty but the defeated side could not afford to raise an appeal to the higher courts? And what’s to say those ‘higher’ courts are any less incompetent than the lower courts? Just a money wasting and incompetent judicial system!
 

gaximus

macrumors 68020
Oct 11, 2011
2,302
4,659
Could you image going to court for something, getting the verdict of "Not guilty", then someone else comes along later and says, "actually it looks like we might of made some mistakes during the trail, and we would like to take you back to trial". I'd be terrified to live if the EU if they don't have any kind of protections against Double Jeopardy.
 

norbinhouston

macrumors 6502
Oct 14, 2011
475
775
Houston
How forists in here used to say, just get an adapter!

Anyway, i doubt that Apple will come with anything newer than USB-C in the next decades.
Simply because they still hold strong on USB2.0 transfer speeds, which is nearly 24 years old.
A new plug for old tech has no benefit, except to drive cable and adapter sales.
How does that drive cable and adapter sales? Your logic is flawed. Apple is saving you money by not requiring a thunderbolt cable. Which they could have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silverdollar

TigerNike23

macrumors 6502a
Feb 13, 2017
916
2,198
Fort Myers, FL
This reminds me of the 1972 Olympic gold medal game in men’s basketball, where the referee kept changing the clock so the Soviets could win.
 

siddavis

macrumors 6502a
Feb 23, 2009
888
2,999
Multinational corporations pass much of the tax increases to the consumers. In the end, arguing for more Apple taxes is an argument to pay more for Apple products.
Yeah, but they'll feel so good about themselves for attacking and getting the big bad multinational. The feels are what matters, not any actual results.
Kind of like when US federal tax cuts are implemented and tax revenue actually increases. The feels are all "the sky is falling" and never care to look at the effect. Marxism is alive and well because emotions rule the day.
 

RFolk

macrumors regular
Oct 1, 2019
145
341
USA
I am surprised that many people don't understand the fact that Ireland and Apple made a deal, to get neconcurențial business on one side and to avoid taxes on the other side. In a nutshell that is all that is happening here. Apple plays the card of "we didn't know" like not knowing is going to resolve anything.
Let's be honest, we like to make EU the bad guys, which they might be, but Apple is not innocent either. We as a consumer we'll pay the price (just like we pay premium for extra 8 GRAM ;))
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167 and bici
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.