Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Except that's not going to happen. They then will just discontinue the weaker products and increase the prices of the products where they have more strength. Which means.. well.. less choice for the customer (you already see this happening within the EU) and more expensive devices / software / etc.
And 3-party apps stores are still not even a hobby on iPhone in the EU.
  • Third-party app stores in the EU under the Digital Markets Act see adoption rates below 3%.
 
It’s just that Apple were acting very “inorganic” in holding on to their proprietary Lightning connectors for as long as they did.

Their products would have been laughed at and avoided by many consumers 2020 and beyond, were it not for their huge market share in smartphones allowing them to get away with it.

Apple did exactly what they said they would do. When Apple introduced Lightning USB-C wasn't a standard yet. During the iPhone 5 keynote, Apple executives explicitly referred to Lightning as a "modern connector for the next decade," assuring third-party accessory manufacturers that investing heavily in re-tooling their product lines would be worth it and they would not change it for a decade. The final lightning iPhone was released 10 years later and on the 11th year they switched the iPhone to USB-C.
 
Last edited:
This is not true

Booking.com for example is labelled as gatekeeper and is a company from the Netherlands, which is an EU country.

Get your facts straight if you want to throw them around.
It’s actually American.


Booking Holdings Inc. is an American travel technology company based in Norwalk, Connecticut, that owns and operates several travel fare aggregators and travel fare metasearch engines including namesake and flagship Booking.com
 
The big issue with bills like this is that I agree with about 75% of it. Same goes for the Digital markets act.
But I disagree with the remaining 25% so strongly that it usually outweighs the remaining 75%.
It’s like all of these bills that are introduced take 5 steps forward… then fall backwards down a flight of stairs at the last possible minute..



Misusing nonpublic business-user data to copy and compete against small businesses.

  • Blocking business users from accessing or moving their own data from one digital platform to another.
  • Retaliating against users or business users who raise legal concerns.
  • Unfairly enforcing terms of service in ways that harm competition.
  • Conditioning companies' access to the platform, or product placement on the platform, on purchase or use of unrelated services.
  • Locking users into default settings.
  • Skewing ranking or presentation against similarly situated business users.
Like the DMA, AICOA would allow for third-party app marketplaces and alternative payment methods
This is all absolutely fantastic, a very needed step forward.
Third party app marketplaces, alternate payment methods, Apple not taking their 30% on literally everything, the ability to easily switch platforms, so on and so on… These are fantastic changes.
However…


Unfairly favoring their own products or services.

  • Unfairly limiting competitors' access to key platform features.
  • mandating open platform access
These are all absolutely awful, not just for Apple but for the tech space at large.
I think Apple should be forced to play fair, what I don’t think is that Apple should be Force to do is stop being Apple.
Literally from the beginning, or at least since the late 90s, during their big comeback the biggest plus Apple has been able to use to set itself apart is the ecosystem.
Buy an iBook/MacBook and synchronize it with your iPod, and then go take some photos with your iPhone, edit them on your MacBook and look back at them on the Apple TV, then use your iPad to catch up on those emails related to the stuff you did earlier on the MacBook.
And do this all with AirPods in your ears seamlessly transitioning from one device to the next.

Under all of these laws, it very quickly becomes Apple being forced to make any crappy product, no matter how awful, work perfectly with their devices, and if it doesn’t, it’s their fault. Even if it’s some cheap $10 smart watch, it has to work absolutely flawlessly with the iPhone as the Apple Watch does. And Apple can’t say anything about the security, because they have no idea where that $10 smart watch has come from and what it’s sending back to its creator.
This is not a world I want. I don’t want a world where Apple gets punished because some consumer who didn’t know better bought a $35 set of AI AirPods knockoffs, and every time Siri read out a text message: it was being sent right from those headphones to a server in the UK where their government can go ahead and snoop.
Or even putting the security argument aside, just think of all the awful experiences now that people are going to blame Apple, or Google, or Samsung for because they have to Open their platform to any ol’ junk hardware manufacturer. It’s gonna be like the absolute scam that printers already are, but on a much wider scale. The market of knockoff technically Apple compatible Apple watches and AirPods and HomePods and AirTags is already pretty big, but it’s going to absolutely blow up if this bill goes through. And it’s going to be bad.

Again, a lot of the stuff I absolutely like. I don’t think Apple should be allowed to make developers and other technology companies lives a nightmare. But Apple should still be allowed to let Apple devices work best together because they are Apple devices. Same with Samsung. I don’t think they should be forced to give up their biggest advantage that sets them apart.

And I certainly don’t think that Apple should be forced to allow iPhone mirroring and notifications forwarding on Android and Windows.

And as several other commenters have mentioned, both in the US and the European Union, why on earth are game consoles excluded from all of these laws?
Game consoles are more walled garden locked in than any Apple product has been ever.
Nintendo makes Apple’s garden look like the walls are made of paper in comparison.
 
Last edited:
This is not true

Booking.com for example is labelled as gatekeeper and is a company from the Netherlands, which is an EU country.

Get your facts straight if you want to throw them around.
To be fair, atoqir did specify booking.com


Founded in 1996 in Amsterdam, Booking.com has grown from a small Dutch start-up to one of the world’s leading digital travel companies. Part of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG), the mission of Booking.com is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
To be fair, atoqir did specify booking.com


Founded in 1996 in Amsterdam, Booking.com has grown from a small Dutch start-up to one of the world’s leading digital travel companies. Part of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG), the mission of Booking.com is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world.
Booking.com has been American company since 2005. Just because their Headquarters are in Europe doesn’t change the fact that their owners are American.

To put a point on it, no one considers Apple’s Irish subsidiaries European companies. We didn’t consider Skype a EU company anymore after Microsoft bought them. We don’t consider Waze an Israeli company anymore.

Booking.com is an American company.
 
If a company is forced to develop features for their competitors, then essentially they'd only develop those features out of the kindness of their heart. It could still happen, but without financial motivation, the pace of new features coming to market will come to a crawl, especially considering it will take much more work to make those features work with competitors' products. There's nothing to argue there, it's just natural consequence. That may be a consequence that the US is willing to accept, but customers may be in for an unpleasant surprise at the reduced pace of innovation when it comes to ecosystem integration. Some consumers seem to think this type of bill will be good for them because "more choice", but more likely what will happen is what's happening in the EU with new features not making it to market. If this happens everywhere, then no one will be getting those new features because there will be no motivation to develop them. There will be more equality, but in the bad way. Not lifting competition up, but a downward flattening. There will still be new features that work in isolated products, but ecosystem integration features will stagnate and may even eventually get more and more disjointed.

Even more concerning though is security and privacy implications.
 
No thanks China. You do as the government says or else.
America is gone to communists. You don't own and run your own company anymore.
Everyone gets a piece of it! You have to share an Empire you built with everyone else!
Dragons are among us!
 
Government hacks in both parties are so out of touch with technology and basic common sense. And they act like Americans are stupid and can’t run their own lives. Ok some are, but let Darwinism deal with the stupid ☠️
 
If someone uses another App Store hacked apps, they should be locked out of iCloud and private cloud computing. Hacked iPhones have no business in the Apple ecosystem. There should be consequences got reckless behavior endangering the rest of us. Bollucks up your own phone, not everyone else’s!
 
I love my iPhone and Mac but I may want to use another brands watch, headphones or whatever is better. Apple is wrong here. If I want to use a better smartwatch Apple is blocking all the features that are reserved to its own watch. Same with headphones. I was able to use headphone accommodation on my old wired Sony headphones for years but now Apple is forcing me to by EarPods and blocks this feature for no reason! Hell no Apple!
What is “Headphone Accommodation”?
 
so if the bill passes, how is it fair I'm locked in to Amy Klobuchar's decision instead of Apple's decision? what choice do I have if I want the Apple way of 100% end to end curated user experience?

the bill itself is hypocritical.
You know how democracy works? It's not Amy Klobuchar's decision, a person elected by the people present a law that gets voted by a parliament elected by the people to represent them. According to your logic every conceivable law is "hypocritical" 😀 Anyway, just keep using Apple services, app stores and payment methods only and you are all set. And safe too, Mac OS always worked this way and never suffered the issues Apple uses as a scarecrow to try and keep iOS closed.
 
Apple did exactly what they said they would do. When Apple introduced Lightning USB-C wasn't a standard yet. During the iPhone 5 keynote, Apple executives explicitly referred to Lightning as a "modern connector for the next decade," assuring third-party accessory manufacturers that investing heavily in re-tooling their product lines would be worth it and they would not change it for a decade. The final lightning iPhone was released 10 years later and on the 11th year they switched the iPhone to USB-C.
If it was supposed to
be exactly for a decade, why did USB-C connectors appear on Apple devices instead of Lightning connectors before the 10 year mark?
 
  • Like
Reactions: eifelbube
Under all of these laws, it very quickly becomes Apple being forced to make any crappy product, no matter how awful, work perfectly with their devices, and if it doesn’t, it’s their fault
Not at all. Apple must implement APIs and pairing methods that allow for the same kind of functionality. Once that is done, Apple has fulfilled what is required by them by these laws.
Apple is not required to seek out every single device in existence and adapt to it.
 
Amy Klobuchar wouldn't know tech knowledge if it hit her in the face & Grassley's too senile to know anything "tech" beyond a white piece of chalk and a board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRSugarD
"We strongly disagree with the Senate's consideration of European-style regulation that would hamper innovation and force changes consumers never asked for, while undermining the privacy, security and child safety protections they rely on every day. Apple is proud to be an engine of innovation, job creation, and economic growth in the U.S., where some of the world's most innovative companies have designed technology that has changed the world. Importing Europe's failed policies will not increase competition -- it will make it more difficult to do business right here at home."

The reality is that Apple's child safety protections have been weak, easily broken and no protection at all for any child who is tech saavy (though this may change a little with the '27 releases). Competitors who actually want to do a good job are hamstrung by a lack of access to core OS components that would allow for descent AI-based filtering of adults content across all apps. This is possible on Android devices and in Windows, but not MacOS or iOS.

Solutions for iOS have to instead rely upon VPN-based filtering which is itself a privacy risk, manually restricting access to apps through MDM profiles and blocking browser access. Even these aren't fullproof because of the way some websites dynamically load deliver content which prevents VPN-based filtering from being effective.

Apple doesn't yet do a good enough job when it comes to protecting children and its policies have actively prevented other companies from doing their best with its platforms. Apple has the ability to block imagery in messages and facetime, but the biggest risk is every other app and browser that delivers content from the internet. For that the only solution is blocking most of the internet, which isn't really a solution at all for older children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.