The majority of them do. Name someone you know that has a $30 flip phone instead of a smart phone?
Interesting however this further confirms that the 5c's current color scheme is geared towards the female audience and that's a missed opportunity for Apple cutting out the male audience.
Exactly. Buying a colorful iPhone immediately tells everyone that you did not buy the flagship. They know you have an iPhone still but they also know you spent far less on that iPhone than the guy/gal walking around with the metal/adult colored iPhone. Yes its superficial as all hell but consumers are superficial as hell.
Wow, just 5 minutes ago those were my thoughts too. A black 5c and a Product Red would really be a great addition and would attract a much larger male audience of many ages. I'm not crazy about the current colors either. Much of that might be the reason for softer sales.
Yes. I think Apple should add some additional colors to the line up. Black for sure. But it shows that the colors Apple chose weren't just someone throwing a dart at the wall blindfolded and then seeing what color it landed on.
I'm really surprised that there wasn't one in black. That would probably be a lot more appealing to male users.
People wanted gold, not an iphone 5 wrapped in plastic for $100 less.
If this had been a Samsung phone that got discounted and production was pulled back on, we would say that it was because the phone was not selling as well as expected. We wouldn't miss a beat.
The iPhone 5c is not selling as well as expected. The 5s is selling better than expected. 5s was ramped up. 5c scaled back.
End of story.
I have moved forward to android.....Dont really care!
I cut out a couple bits, to address the key ones. The little children jab is you not understanding the myriad of arguments people are presenting. You are in "apple think", and can not break out of it. Your #4 and #5 points are EXACTLY what people are saying is the wrong approach.
Apple's approach, with your 10000% obvious approval, is to sell 5% more phones, year after year - period, end of story. Again, look to #4 and #5. But that isn't good enough anymore. That was a fine approach in 2007-2011, but the environment is not the same anymore. You actually have COMPETITION. And right now, Apple is losing market share to the competition. Apple is following the same gameplan that took them to the bring in the 90s - High margins, incremental sales, bury it's head in the sand concerning competition.
From all accounts, the 5 was difficult to manufacture, that was the driving force behind the 5c. IF your goal is to sell 5% more YOY, you go about what Apple did and scoop out the innards of the 5 and slap them in a cheaper to produce plastic shell, and ship 'em. Much like Apple, you end the story here, and berate anyone who questions Apple's approach. But what people are pushing is the battle apple is winning here, is causing Apple to lose the war.
Staying the upper, upper, tier is causing apple to lose market share. At some point in time, following this approach, you will have developers starting to jump ship because its doesn't pay to program to the 5%. You laugh at the notion, but so did Apple at one point in time.
People wanted and still want an upper-mid price point Phone to compete with Android, one they can more easily afford, and secures iOS's position in the environment. Apple path, with you cheering all along the way, eventually leads to high priced dust collectors, when competitors eventually gain a stranglehold of the marketplace.
iJunk not selling!... Surprise?...nope..![]()
What people didn't want a phone that had last year's technology in it? Shocking.
Exactly, that is the metric. How do we know that the 5c is exceeding it though? Just curious. I didn't think Apple would release a 5s/5c sales breakdown.
Why else would Apple reduce iPhone 5c production at two major suppliers?
Exactly, that is the metric. How do we know that the 5c is exceeding it though? Just curious. I didn't think Apple would release a 5s/5c sales breakdown.
What people didn't want a phone that had last year's technology in it? Shocking.
The majority of them do. Name someone you know that has a $30 flip phone instead of a smart phone?
I know several people. Mostly people (myself included) who are kinda like "eh...okay...not that big a deal in my life right now." Granted it is a diminishing crowd. But even in the smart phone market not everyone buys the most expensive, top of the line model. If that were true, no one would be offering an other models.
Fact is, the smart phone market is maturing and probably saturating to the point where there will be further price discrimination. The phone has arrived at the point where it's pretty much good enough for what most people need. Apple probably got there with the 5/5C...and the 5S is starting to look like a small reach in terms of new bells and whistles.
allthingsd reports a survey showing the 5c is selling 27% of the total iPhone sales, whereas last year the 4s sold 23%, while the total number of iPhones sold increased, one can conclude the 5c is both higher in % and higher in actual units sold than it's predecessor, the 4s.
Despite the 5cs newness and its colorful design, its not selling that much better than the 4S did when it was demoted to legacy iPhone by the flagship iPhone 5.
Over time, the lower-priced phones have tended to gain share versus the flagship phone, after the initial rush of dedicated upgraders to the newest device.
I remember back in the day of flip phones that everyone kept them in their pocket and pulled them out when they got a call. Now people leave their phones on the corner of the table while in public so everyone can see what they have.
iPhone 5c is only selling better than every Android phone out there, what does that say about those phones?