(The problem with stories like this is that things get posted faster than you can read them...)
powermac666 said:
Single button mice are fine, and offer a rich user interface when combined with some timely keyboard shortcuts.
Multi-button scroll mice are equally fine.
People prefer one or the other.
Apple is smart if they offer the choice, particularly to switchers. Make the venerable one button mouse the default, and let people upgrade to a multi-button mouse for an upcharge. Sounds like the Apple way to me.
Sure, I'd be for that. I use my 2-button-plus-scrollwheel mouse with my PC and the one-button mouse with my iMac. I don't have any problem with the one-button mouse; it feels better than the 2-button mouse (which, by the way, is a cheap model) but is less convenient for copying and pasting text, in my opinion. I've been lusting after the MX700 and MX1000 from Logitech for a little while now.
paulwhannel said:
As for the thread. How's this for wishful thinking? Gyroscopic. They should at least leave room for it, if they ever debut a TV-based product it would be the perfect Apple way to control it. Maybe I'm just obsessed with the gyroscopic pointers we have at work. 15 years ago, Apple would have made one... they made anything back then, just to say they did. Drop-loading CD-ROM drive/player that can run off of 8AA batteries? Sure! It's COOL! I miss all those random Apple-branded toys, even if they were market failures.
I think I'm going to go buy a gyro pointer now.
Paul, there already
is one available.
http://www.gyration.com/ultragt.htm
hob said:
This thread has made me want to buy a new mouse
Me, too.
Lynxpro said:
What next? A decently priced Apple branded 17" LCD monitor to sell along with the Mac Mini? They should, because it isn't even funny how many people are buying the black Dell 17" LCD monitors to hook up to their Mac Minis. Blasphemy!
(...and, by the time you've quoted all the other people, you've forgotten what it was you wanted to say initially.
)
Oh, yeah...I think we're seeing Apple change direction in a few areas these days. In one respect, there seems to be a greater desire to
attract the potential switcher. A few examples have been mentioned already (iTunes/iPod on Windows, the Mac mini, the wording on the iPod box, the switch to USB 2.0). The iPod-touting Windows user is, in a lot of cases, sitting on the fence, or "on the ropes." Apple wants to go in for the knockout punch. They want to
make the "halo effect" happen as opposed to waiting to
let it happen. The other trend-- and it all started with the socks-- is Apple's realization that the
accessory market is an uber lucrative one..and they want some of that pie. As far as I'm concerned, a multi-button mouse would stem from both of those desires.
Personally, I don't blame them. It makes financial sense. Why have Logitech, Belkin, Griffin, and the like take in hundreds of millions of dollars a year that could just as easily go in Apple's pockets?
Finally, I think that if they
do make another mouse, it will be astounding. Perhaps they'll incorporate gyroscopic technology. Perhaps it will double as an iTunes remote. And perhaps it will have a laser. Who knows?
Squire