Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It shows the term "App Store" is in fact extremely generic.

"Apple App Store" IMHO is perfectly acceptable.
'

Off topic, please show link me to where you rooted your EVO with 2.3.

On topic: its kind of pathetic... the granduer of it all... that just adding Apple to the "app store" moniker, would quash all our bickering and hatred.
 
Not entirely accurate, here... and that is where the dispute lies I think.

Take Kleenex and Band-Aid for example. They very nearly lost their trademarks through brand dilution and failing to protect them because the terms became generic in the populace. I didn't ask for a bandage anymore, I asked for a band-aid. I don't ask for a nose tissue, I ask for a kleenex.

Now, you can claim Apple went into this with a term that is utterly impossible to protect. But I think what we have here is more a Kleenex/Band-Aid issue than the hardware store called "Hardware Store". The general public didn't really call their local software store the "app store". You didn't hear people
saying "Lemme run down to the local app store to pick up OS X 10.5". You didn't even hear this term in reference to the Windows Marketplace on Vista/Win7. This term came into use with the launch of the App Store on the iPhone. That's when you started hearing "Let me download this off the app store."

It can certainly be argued that the trademark dissolves in water and is already diluted, and therefore generic. But I don't think the term was generic enough a the time it was filed for to warrant a rejection then. Of course, the complaint filed by Microsoft doesn't need to care about then. It's about wether or not the term is generic now.

I'm not sure Kleenex or Band-Aid make for a perfect analogy either. Kleenex and Band-Aid are both invented terms - they nearly lost their trademarks because the brands became so ubiquitous, not because the terms themselves were generic.

There are two big reasons that you didn't hear references to an "app store" before Apple's announcement, I think: one, the word "app" hadn't yet entered the popular lexicon, and two, there weren't any high-profile for-profit software repositories. (I wasn't even aware Microsoft had a "Windows Marketplace" in Windows Vista/7).

No one is disputing that the term "app store" was never used in its current context prior to the Apple App Store, and only those of us with extremely selective memories are claiming that Apple coined the term "app." In this case, I think that the trademark is diluted enough that it doesn't matter that it came first (you were entirely correct in your assessment of my argument).

Considering that it's only two and a half years later, and there are already at least three high-profile services that can be legitimately described as "app stores," I don't feel Apple has grounds to claim the term "app store" as their own.
 
App Store is a perfect trademark

app store is pretty lame to trademark, its like pepsi being the only company to use a shade of blue, its ridiculous bs.

App Store is a perfect trademark, it's short, easy to remember, and tells you exactly what the product or service is. Good to see the Microsoft marketing department participating in these threads. :cool:

lol dork.
 
App Store is a perfect trademark, it's short, easy to remember, and tells you exactly what the product or service is. Good to see the Microsoft marketing department participating in these threads. :cool:

lol dork.

Exactly why it should be Apple App Store. It identifies the company, product, and service in only three words.

Even iApp Store.

Same way they changed iChat to Facetime. Never too late for change.
 
I see a lot of hypocritical MSFT fanboys on here. You attack Apple for "app" but ignore windows, office, word, excel, access, outlook, exchange, visual, studio and expression.

The "Mac App Store" and "App Store" are not generic because they are the online software stores that sells "apps" with an app file extension.

MSFT is free to create an "EXE store" or an "Program Store" as those are terms which they use in their OS documentation and literature.

From early on, Apple has used the term "application" or "app" to refer to programs and these programs were bundled inside an application package called a fat binary which had not only the executable code but also resources. With the advent of OS X, applications were provided in application bundles with the extension of ".app". If you choose to display extensions, you will see that all applications in the /Applications/ folder have a ".app" extension.

Applications on iOS devices also have .app extension but you just never see it unless if you jailbreak the device and use a file manager.

In a nutshell, the "app store" on iOS and the "Mac App store" on OS X sell "app" packages whereas other platforms do not.
 
I see a lot of hypocritical MSFT fanboys on here. You attack Apple for "app" but ignore windows, office, word, excel, access, outlook, exchange, visual, studio and expression.

The "Mac App Store" and "App Store" are not generic because they are the online software stores that sells "apps" with an app file extension.

MSFT is free to create an "EXE store" or an "Program Store" as those are terms which they use in their OS documentation and literature.

From early on, Apple has used the term "application" or "app" to refer to programs and these programs were bundled inside an application package called a fat binary which had not only the executable code but also resources. With the advent of OS X, applications were provided in application bundles with the extension of ".app". If you choose to display extensions, you will see that all applications in the /Applications/ folder have a ".app" extension.

Applications on iOS devices also have .app extension but you just never see it unless if you jailbreak the device and use a file manager.

As said earlier in this discussion, Mac App Store is fine, Apple App Store is fine.

Microsoft does not just call thier products office, word, etc.

Product Listing:

Microsoft Windows XP
Microsoft Windows Vista
Microsoft Windows 7
Microsoft Office Xp
Microsoft Office 2010
Microsoft Marketplace

Microsoft identifies itself in its service or products.

Even Blackberry with Blackbery App World.

microsoft simply does not want apple to trademark the term "app store" by itself, eliminating themselves or anyone else from using app store in a future instances.
 
I see a lot of hypocritical MSFT fanboys on here. You attack Apple for "app" but ignore windows, office, word, excel, access, outlook, exchange, visual, studio and expression.

The "Mac App Store" and "App Store" are not generic because they are the online software stores that sells "apps" with an app file extension.

So you just posted without reading the thread obviously. Come back after you've examined: http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/EN-US.aspx
 
Who cares! :)

Really people... who cares?

This is just all legal junk going back and forth. Lawyers will sort it all out.

In the mean time.... one more day!!!! iPad 2 coming! :D
 
Exactly why it should be Apple App Store. It identifies the company, product, and service in only three words.

Even iApp Store.

Should be? I think a point that you are missing is that Apple wants to use the trademark across a range of stores. Currently the (iOS) App Store and the Mac App Store. Maybe the AppleTV App Store in the future.
 
Should be? I think a point that you are missing is that Apple wants to use the trademark across a range of stores. Currently the (iOS) App Store and the Mac App Store. Maybe the AppleTV App Store in the future.

Exactly why Apple App Store would work.

It doesnt get into specifics. Apple App Store would work across every platform.
 
I see a lot of hypocritical MSFT fanboys on here. You attack Apple for "app" but ignore windows, office, word, excel, access, outlook, exchange, visual, studio and expression.

None of those terms can be used to describe the product, though - there's a level of abstraction between the product's name and functionality that isn't present with "app store."

The "Mac App Store" and "App Store" are not generic because they are the online software stores that sells "apps" with an app file extension.

MSFT is free to create an "EXE store" or an "Program Store" as those are terms which they use in their OS documentation and literature.

From early on, Apple has used the term "application" or "app" to refer to programs and these programs were bundled inside an application package called a fat binary which had not only the executable code but also resources. With the advent of OS X, applications were provided in application bundles with the extension of ".app". If you choose to display extensions, you will see that all applications in the /Applications/ folder have a ".app" extension.

Applications on iOS devices also have .app extension but you just never see it unless if you jailbreak the device and use a file manager.

In a nutshell, the "app store" on iOS and the "Mac App store" on OS X sell "app" packages whereas other platforms do not.

No, that's a straw man. The "app" in "App Store" isn't a reference to the .app extension, and you know it. It's a reference to an "app," as in "application software," a term which Apple popularized but did not invent.

Want proof? Applications on iOS devices do NOT use the .app extension, contrary to your claim. It's .ipa. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.ipa_(file_extension)
 
You remember the Handango Palm App Store than of course? It was preinstalled on most Palm devices.

I do indeed remember it, and it wasn't called an app store (Handango InHand), it still isn't now. It's still called "Handango InHand". I think when I first used it it was just called Handango and it was *****, i just used Palmgear instead.

They do however now use "app-store" in their URL and title, most likely for SEO purposes. Unfortunately I am unable to confirm this due to archive.org being down for maintenance, but I'm sure we won't find any reference to "app store" prior to the iPhone 3G.

The only people who even use the term "App Store" is arguably amazon in 2011 (although it's "Appstore") and LG/Samsung with "Application Store" since 2009, all after the Apple's "App Store"
 
But that's not the point. The app store is an app store, right? Windows is an OS, not a collection of physical windows. As the user you quoted said, it'd have to be an OS called "Operating System". Windows isn't a GUI, nor is Mac OSX. They contain/implement GUIs but they're not sold as GUIs.

Thank you. It's just so facetious how quick you mongrels here are to deride a person you disagree with, when your comprehension of the subject matter is, well, not substantial.
 
Apple made a dumb argument. The point here is that "App Store" explains what the service is or does. "Windows" does not explain what the OS is or does, and nor does "Office." This isn't about a word that's commonly used, but about a word that explains what the actual product is.

No way is Apple winning this. Dream on fanboys.
 
Exactly why Apple App Store would work.

It doesnt get into specifics. Apple App Store would work across every platform.

Maybe I wasn't clear. They want to differentiate the store names between platforms while linking them together with the term "App Store." The fact that you think the term "Apple App Store" would work better is irrelevant.
 
You're not denying its an "App Store" though right?

Nobody is denying what it IS called NOW.

BEFORE Apple used the term "App Store" nothing else was referred to as an app store.

Handango is called an app store now because that term became the term to use when Apple coined it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.