Couple of months ago many here did believe 5.5" iPhone 6 was non existing!!
Every Apple product goes through its "It doesn't exist!!" phase. It'll happen every time Apple does something new, because people struggle with change.
Couple of months ago many here did believe 5.5" iPhone 6 was non existing!!
Outside chance Apple are doing the unthinkable and making a MS Surface competitor - i.e. tablet form with attachable keyboard that would explain origin of both rumoured products. But given the abject failure that is Surface, I don't think that is likely.
These constant backtracking rumours are making me weary.
It seems this is the cycle:
1) Analyst makes an unsubstantiated guess on a new Apple product and its release date
2) No part leaks/product not released/product never existed
3) Analyst stipulates why this didn't come to fruition (e.g., iPhone demand, iOS bugs, Saturn's alignment with Jupiter)
I know I'm probably on the wrong website to make this comment, but it seems every time there's a rumour about an upcoming product, there's a conflicting rumour a few days later.
Just how many believed the 6+ didn't exist?
Making tablets gizmos for noodling on the World Wide Web and consuming content is what's seen their sales slide. They are just not essential enough unless they can be, for at least some users, laptop alternatives.
The report also states that Foxconn is having issues with hiring enough factory workers to assemble the iPhone 6 and the iPhone 6 Plus at its factory in Zhengzhou, China
Just how many believed the 6+ didn't exist?
It is because iPads have a 4:3 screen ratio and MacBook Air 13" has 16:10 ratio.
So the display area would indeed be much larger on a 12,9" ipad than on a 13" macbook.
Whenever they do start selling this giant iPad, it - along with the Apple watch - will be two of the most underwhelming products in Apples lineup in terms of sales.
And oh, by the way Apple - just making the same basic product thinner and/or bigger every once in a while doesn't count as ground breaking innovation.
What if the 12 inch macbook and 12 inch iPad were the same device? A hybrid?
On a separate note that concept of a 12 inch iPad next to the 13 inch macbook has the iPad with a much larger screen![]()
I have to agree with the majority here. I don't see a big enough market to justify a "big iPad" on it's own. If it's really just the screen for or a hybrid new MacBook Air/ detachable iPad that's a different story.
If you kept your eyes and ears open, you would have noticed that Adobe just announced that it added touch interfaces for its destop apps, Photoshop and Illustrator, to run on 2-in-1 devices like the Surface Pro 3. I'm thinking the new iPad will be able to run such apps.
Indeed. But there is a crucial difference - a larger phone made sense. A larger ipad does not. Who the hell wants a 12.9inch tablet? That would be totally impractical. There is also the rumoured fanless 12" macbook air - a product which makes far more sense. Now why would Apple be working on a 12"ish MBA and a 12"ish ipad that would only end up as direct competitors ??? No siree - I say there is one product - the 12" MBA. These reports of a 12"ipad are most likely simply confusing information relating to the MBA for the ipad.
Outside chance Apple are doing the unthinkable and making a MS Surface competitor - i.e. tablet form with attachable keyboard that would explain origin of both rumoured products. But given the abject failure that is Surface, I don't think that is likely.
I don't know why Apple don't ask Samsung to help out with the production. They could do with some work given they're struggling to make a profit.
The difference here is the Wall Street Journal. Despite the Murdochization of the WSJ and the attendant loss of quality they still have the best investigative business reporters in the US. And while you correctly describe the rumor swirl in the 6 months before a major Apple tick announcement you'll also note that about 5 days before the announcement date the WSJ typically has an article nailing down a subset of the rumors as factual - and that article turns out to be ~95% correct.
If Apple wants to truly shake up the iPad line to counter slumping sales, they should release a 4.7" & 5.5" iPod Touch. They're more iPad than iPod anyway. I think more people would buy a 5.5" iPod Touch aka iPad Nano than would buy a 12.9" iPad pro. But I like the idea of a 12.9" iPad pro as well. ;-)
It is because iPads have a 4:3 screen ratio and MacBook Air 13" has 16:10 ratio.
So the display area would indeed be much larger on a 12,9" ipad than on a 13" macbook.
Tim Cook often places also "incredible" in his phrases, but seldom we see something "unusual" from AppleOn the last earnings call Cook said Apple had "interesting" things planned for the iPad space. I doubt A8 and Touch ID qualifies as interesting.
I simply don't believe this product exists.
But the problem with this idea is that it only caters to a small niche of market. The iPad is a mass-market device, as it meant to do what a majority of people use a PC for: web-browsing, social media, videos, e-mail, and some light productivity like some word-processing or making videos in iMovie. A 13" iPad would be a total waste if it's limited to that kind of usage, and I don't see how anyone would find a much better use for it over the 10" iPad.
As for a digitizer, one can only dream of Apple doing such thing. But seriously, if they do it, then it would truly mark the end of the Steve Jobs-era of Apple.![]()
Who says it wont be able to do more?
Many Artists out there bought the Surface Pro line simply because it was a good drawing device. If the 13 Inch iPad had a digitizer Input device I would buy it day one.
What I bolded is nothing more than your opinion that you are masquerading as fact.I just don't get why anyone would need a 13" iPad. Don't get me wrong, I love my iPad, and I use it every single day, but a 13" iPad seems like an overkill for what it's capable of. Wether we like it or not, a truly productive device needs a keyboard and a mouse, and iOS apps were never designed to have a mouse.
I have used split-screen on a tablet (Surface RT and Surface 2). For those of us who use our tablets for productivity (in addition to entertainment and casual uses) such a feature is very helpful.Mac OS X on the other hand wasn't designed for touch interfaces, so I don't think we'll see a 13" Macbook Air Touch either.
Many of the great iPad apps fit perfectly at 10 inches, but at freaking 13" diagonally, they'll just be way too big and don't offer extra productivity over the 10" iPad, or maybe even the iPad Mini.
I think splitscreen multitasking on iOS will be gimmicky at best, and will complicate the experience even further.